Can Water Vapour Raman Lidar Resolve Profiles of Turbulent Variables in the Convective Boundary Layer?

High-resolution water vapour measurements made by the Atmospheric Radiation Measurement (ARM) Raman lidar operated at the Southern Great Plains Climate Research Facility site near Lamont, Oklahoma, U.S.A. are presented. Using a 2-h measurement period for the convective boundary layer (CBL) on 13 September 2005, with temporal and spatial resolutions of 10 s and 75 m, respectively, spectral and autocovariance analyses of water vapour mixing ratio time series are performed. It is demonstrated that the major part of the inertial subrange was detected and that the integral scale was significantly larger than the time resolution. Consequently, the major part of the turbulent fluctuations was resolved. Different methods to retrieve noise error profiles yield consistent results and compare well with noise profiles estimated using Poisson statistics of the Raman lidar signals. Integral scale, mixing-ratio variance, skewness, and kurtosis profiles were determined including error bars with respect to statistical and sampling errors. The integral scale ranges between 70 and 130 s at the top of the CBL. Within the CBL, up to the third order, noise errors are significantly smaller than sampling errors and the absolute values of turbulent variables, respectively. The mixing-ratio variance profile rises monotonically from ≈0.07 to ≈3.7 g2 kg−2 in the entrainment zone. The skewness is nearly zero up to 0.6 z/zi, becomes −1 around 0.7–0.8 z/zi, crosses zero at about 0.95 z/zi, and reaches about 1.7 at 1.1 z/zi (here, z is the height and zi is the CBL depth). The noise errors are too large to derive fourth-order moments with sufficient accuracy. Consequently, to the best of our knowledge, the ARM Raman lidar is the first water vapour Raman lidar with demonstrated capability to retrieve profiles of turbulent variables up to the third order during daytime throughout the atmospheric CBL.

[1]  R. E. Cupp,et al.  Doppler lidar measurement of profiles of turbulence and momentum flux , 1989 .

[2]  V. Wulfmeyer,et al.  Ground-based differential absorption lidar for water-vapor and temperature profiling: development and specifications of a high-performance laser transmitter. , 1998, Applied optics.

[3]  Beat Schmid,et al.  Evaluation of daytime measurements of aerosols and water vapor made by an operational Raman lidar over the Southern Great Plains , 2006 .

[4]  Volker Wulfmeyer,et al.  Investigation of Turbulent Processes in the Lower Troposphere with Water Vapor DIAL and Radar–RASS , 1999 .

[5]  L. C. Chen,et al.  Estimation of spatially distributed latent heat flux over complex terrain from a Raman lidar , 2000 .

[6]  Volker Wulfmeyer,et al.  Elastic-backscatter-lidar-based characterization of the convective boundary layer and investigation of related statistics , 2010 .

[7]  Volker Wulfmeyer,et al.  On the relationship between relative humidity and particle backscattering coefficient in the marine boundary layer determined with differential absorption lidar , 2000 .

[8]  M. Lemone,et al.  Latent Heat Flux Profiles from Collocated Airborne Water Vapor and Wind Lidars during IHOP_2002 , 2007 .

[9]  Tammy M. Weckwerth,et al.  The Effect of Small-Scale Moisture Variability on Thunderstorm Initiation , 2000 .

[10]  C. Walther,et al.  Future Performance of Ground-Based and Airborne Water-Vapor Differential Absorption Lidar. II. Simulations of the Precision of a Near-Infrared, High-Power System. , 2001, Applied optics.

[11]  Chitra Sivaraman,et al.  Simultaneous analog and photon counting detection for Raman lidar. , 2009, Applied optics.

[12]  David D. Turner,et al.  Twenty-Four-Hour Raman Lidar Water Vapor Measurements during the Atmospheric Radiation Measurement Program’s 1996 and 1997 Water Vapor Intensive Observation Periods , 1999 .

[13]  Roni Avissar,et al.  An Evaluation of the Scale at which Ground-Surface Heat Flux Patchiness Affects the Convective Boundary Layer Using Large-Eddy Simulations , 1998 .

[14]  A. Kolmogorov.  The local structure of turbulence in incompressible viscous fluid for very large Reynolds numbers , 1991, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical and Physical Sciences.

[15]  D. I. Cooper,et al.  Spatial source-area analysis of three-dimensional moisture fields from lidar, eddy covariance, and a footprint model , 2003 .

[16]  Gerhard Peters,et al.  Remote sensing of turbulent ozone fluxes and the ozone budget in the convective boundary layer with DIAL and Radar-RASS : A case study , 1996 .

[17]  J. Bösenberg,et al.  Measurement of Water Vapor Flux Profiles in the Convective Boundary Layer with Lidar and Radar-RASS , 1994 .

[18]  Z. Sorbjan.  Effects Caused by Varying the Strength of the Capping Inversion Based on a Large Eddy Simulation Model of the Shear-Free Convective Boundary Layer , 1996 .

[19]  D. Lenschow,et al.  Water Vapor Flux Measurements from Ground-Based Vertically Pointed Water Vapor Differential Absorption and Doppler Lidars , 1999 .

[20]  Vincent E. Larson,et al.  Systematic Biases in the Microphysics and Thermodynamics of Numerical Models That Ignore Subgrid-Scale Variability , 2001 .

[21]  J. Lenoble,et al.  Methodology for the independent calibration of Raman backscatter water-vapor lidar systems. , 1999, Applied optics.

[22]  Volker Wulfmeyer,et al.  Intercomparison of Water Vapor Data Measured with Lidar during IHOP_2002. Part II: Airborne-to-Airborne Systems , 2007 .

[23]  Volker Wulfmeyer,et al.  Measuring Second- through Fourth-Order Moments in Noisy Data , 2000 .

[24]  J. Goldsmith,et al.  Turn-key Raman lidar for profiling atmospheric water vapor, clouds, and aerosols. , 1997, Applied optics.

[25]  S. H. Melfi,et al.  Raman lidar system for the measurement of water vapor and aerosols in the Earth's atmosphere. , 1992, Applied optics.

[26]  V. Masson,et al.  Negative water vapour skewness and dry tongues in the convective boundary layer: observations and large-eddy simulation budget analysis , 2007 .

[27]  Zhien Wang,et al.  Raman Lidar Measurements during the International H2O Project. Part II: Case Studies , 2006 .

[28]  William E. Eichinger,et al.  The Development of a Scanning Raman Water Vapor Lidar for Boundary Layer and Tropospheric Observations , 1999 .

[29]  Volker Wulfmeyer,et al.  Three-dimensional observations of atmospheric humidity with a scanning differential absorption Lidar , 2009, Remote Sensing.

[30]  Z. Sorbjan.  An Evaluation Of Local Similarity At The Top Of The Mixed Layer Based On Large-Eddy Simulations , 2001 .

[31]  Steven E. Koch,et al.  An Overview of the International H2O Project (IHOP_2002) and Some Preliminary Highlights , 2004 .

[32]  Vincent E. Larson,et al.  Small-Scale and Mesoscale Variability of Scalars in Cloudy Boundary Layers: One-Dimensional Probability Density Functions , 2001 .

[33]  V. Wulfmeyer,et al.  Investigations of Humidity Skewness and Variance Profiles in the Convective Boundary Layer and Comparison of the Latter with Large Eddy Simulation Results , 1999 .

[34]  R. Kropfli.  Single Doppler Radar Measurements of Turbulence Profiles in the Convective Boundary Layer , 1986 .

[35]  J. R. Allan,et al.  Part II. Case Studies , 1993 .

[36]  V. Masson,et al.  Water‐vapour variability within a convective boundary‐layer assessed by large‐eddy simulations and IHOP_2002 observations , 2005 .

[37]  J. Bösenberg,et al.  Ground-based differential absorption lidar for water-vapor profiling: assessment of accuracy, resolution, and meteorological applications. , 1998, Applied optics.

[38]  David D. Turner,et al.  Automated Retrievals of Water Vapor and Aerosol Profiles from an Operational Raman Lidar , 2002 .

[39]  Volker Wulfmeyer,et al.  NCAR–NOAA Lower-Tropospheric Water Vapor Workshop , 1999 .

[40]  Gerhard Ehret,et al.  Estimation of boundary layer humidity fluxes and statistics from airborne differential absorption lidar (DIAL) , 1997 .

[41]  Donald H. Lenschow,et al.  Length Scales in the Convective Boundary Layer , 1986 .

[42]  D. Lenschow,et al.  How long is long enough when measuring fluxes and other turbulence statistics , 1994 .

[43]  Rod Frehlich,et al.  Effects of Wind Turbulence on Coherent Doppler Lidar Performance , 1997 .

[44]  J. Price.  A study of probability distributions of boundary‐layer humidity and associated errors in parametrized cloud‐fraction , 2001 .

[45]  B. Stevens,et al.  Structure of the Entrainment Zone Capping the Convective Atmospheric Boundary Layer , 1998 .

[46]  Rod Frehlich,et al.  Estimating Spatial Velocity Statistics with Coherent Doppler Lidar , 2002 .

[47]  Peter Bechtold,et al.  Modeling of Trade Wind Cumuli with a Low-Order Turbulence Model: Toward a Unified Description of Cu and Se Clouds in Meteorological Models , 1995 .

[48]  C. Walther,et al.  Future performance of ground-based and airborne water-vapor differential absorption lidar. I. Overview and theory. , 2001, Applied optics.

[49]  Guy N. Pearson,et al.  Vertical velocity variance and skewness in clear and cloud‐topped boundary layers as revealed by Doppler lidar , 2009 .

[50]  Donald H. Lenschow,et al.  Uncorrelated Noise in Turbulence Measurements , 1985 .

[51]  V. Wulfmeyer,et al.  Scanning rotational Raman lidar at 355 nm for the measurement of tropospheric temperature fields , 2007 .

[52]  A. Tompkins.  A Prognostic Parameterization for the Subgrid-Scale Variability of Water Vapor and Clouds in Large-Scale Models and Its Use to Diagnose Cloud Cover , 2002 .

[53]  Comments on “A Definitive Approach to Turbulence Statistical Studies in Planetary Boundary Layers” , 1995 .

[54]  L. Mahrt.  Boundary‐layer moisture regimes , 1991 .

[55]  Stephen A. Cohn,et al.  Boundary Layer Height and Entrainment Zone Thickness Measured by Lidars and Wind-Profiling Radars , 2000 .

[56]  John C. Wyngaard,et al.  Statistics of Conservative Scalars in the Convective Boundary Layer , 1984 .

[57]  Stephen A. Cohn,et al.  Radar Measurements of Turbulent Eddy Dissipation Rate in the Troposphere: A Comparison of Techniques , 1995 .

[58]  David D. Turner,et al.  Ability to quantify coherent turbulent structures in the convective boundary layer using thermodynamic profiling instruments , 2006 .

[59]  Warner L. Ecklund,et al.  Fluxes of Heat and Momentum Measured with a Boundary-Layer Wind Profiler Radar-Radio Acoustic Sounding System. , 1993 .

[60]  John C. Wyngaard,et al.  Top-down and bottom-up diffusion of a scalar in the convective boundary layer , 1984 .

[61]  C. Kottmeier,et al.  The convective and orographically-induced precipitation study: A research and development project of the world weather research program , 2008 .

[62]  K. A. Browning,et al.  Global Energy and Water Cycles , 1999 .

[63]  T. Janjić,et al.  Twenty-Four-Hour Observations of the Marine Boundary Layer Using Shipborne NOAA High-Resolution Doppler Lidar , 2005 .

[64]  Larry K. Berg,et al.  A simple parameterization coupling the convective daytime boundary layer and fair-weather cumuli , 2005 .

[65]  Z. Sorbjan.  Statistics of Scalar Fields in the Atmospheric Boundary Layer Based on Large-Eddy Simulations. Part II: Forced Convection , 2006 .

[66]  W. Kustas,et al.  Spatial and temporal variation in evapotranspiration using Raman lidar , 2006 .

[67]  Donald H. Lenschow,et al.  An Objective Method for Deriving Atmospheric Structure from Airborne Lidar Observations , 2000 .

[68]  Donato Summa,et al.  Intercomparison of Water Vapor Data Measured with Lidar during IHOP_2002. Part I: Airborne to Ground-Based Lidar Systems and Comparisons with Chilled-Mirror Hygrometer Radiosondes , 2007 .