Pulse lead/lag timing detection for adaptive feedback and control based on optical spike-timing-dependent plasticity.

Biological neurons perform information processing using a model called pulse processing, which is both computationally efficient and scalable, adopting the best features of both analog and digital computing. Implementing pulse processing with photonics can result in bandwidths that are billions of times faster than biological neurons and substantially faster than electronics. Neurons have the ability to learn and adapt their processing based on experience through a change in the strength of synaptic connections in response to spiking activity. This mechanism is called spike-timing-dependent plasticity (STDP). Functionally, STDP constitutes a mechanism in which strengths of connections between neurons are based on the timing and order between presynaptic spikes and postsynaptic spikes, essentially forming a pulse lead/lag timing detector that is useful in feedback control and adaptation. Here we report for the first time the demonstration of optical STDP that is useful in pulse lead/lag timing detection and apply it to automatic gain control of a photonic pulse processor.

[1]  Paul R Prucnal,et al.  Ultrafast all-optical implementation of a leaky integrate-and-fire neuron. , 2011, Optics express.

[2]  Wulfram Gerstner,et al.  A neuronal learning rule for sub-millisecond temporal coding , 1996, Nature.

[3]  R. Rosenfeld Nature , 2009, Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery.

[4]  Michael I. Jordan,et al.  Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 30 , 1995 .

[5]  Y. Dan,et al.  Spike timing-dependent plasticity: a Hebbian learning rule. , 2008, Annual review of neuroscience.

[6]  G. Bi,et al.  Synaptic modification by correlated activity: Hebb's postulate revisited. , 2001, Annual review of neuroscience.

[7]  L. Abbott,et al.  Competitive Hebbian learning through spike-timing-dependent synaptic plasticity , 2000, Nature Neuroscience.

[8]  K. I. Blum,et al.  Functional significance of long-term potentiation for sequence learning and prediction. , 1996, Cerebral cortex.

[9]  M. Quirk,et al.  Experience-Dependent Asymmetric Shape of Hippocampal Receptive Fields , 2000, Neuron.

[10]  R. Douglas,et al.  A silicon neuron , 1991, Nature.

[11]  Jochen Triesch,et al.  Independent Component Analysis in Spiking Neurons , 2010, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[12]  Yue Tian,et al.  Signal feature recognition based on lightwave neuromorphic signal processing. , 2011, Optics letters.

[13]  Y. Dan,et al.  Spike-timing-dependent synaptic modification induced by natural spike trains , 2002, Nature.

[14]  Patrick D. Roberts,et al.  Computational Consequences of Temporally Asymmetric Learning Rules: I. Differential Hebbian Learning , 1999, Journal of Computational Neuroscience.

[15]  D. Wilkin,et al.  Neuron , 2001, Brain Research.

[16]  S. Akiba,et al.  Effect of hole pile-up at heterointerface on modulation voltage in GaInAsP electroabsorption modulators , 1989 .

[17]  L. F. Abbott,et al.  A Model of Spatial Map Formation in the Hippocampus of the Rat , 1999, Neural Computation.

[18]  J. Hopfield,et al.  Computing with neural circuits: a model. , 1986, Science.

[19]  Alan S. Willsky Paths Ahead in the Science of Information and Decision Systems [In the Spotlight] , 2010, IEEE Signal Processing Magazine.

[20]  M. Koga,et al.  Gain-controlled all-optical inverter switch in a semiconductor laser amplifier. , 1988, Applied optics.

[21]  Paul R Prucnal,et al.  A high performance photonic pulse processing device. , 2009, Optics express.