Developmental change in TATA-box utilization during preimplantation mouse development.

Activation of the embryonic genome during preimplantation mouse development is characterized by a marked reprogramming of gene expression that is essential for further development. Expression of the protein translation initiation factor eIF-1A gene is driven by a proximal TATA-containing promoter and a distal TATA-less promoter. Using specific amplification of cDNA ends that resolves transcripts derived from the TATA-less and TATA-containing promoters, we find that 70% of the eIF-1A transcripts are derived from the TATA-containing promoter in the fully-grown oocyte. Activation of the embryonic genome during the two-cell stage is accompanied by a change in promoter utilization such that only 25% of the transcripts are now derived from the TATA-containing promoter, i.e., 75% are derived from the TATA-less promoter. When one-cell embryos are cultured to the two-cell stage in the presence of alpha-amanitin, this change in transcript abundance is not observed, i.e., the distribution of transcripts is similar to that observed in the oocyte. By the blastocyst stage only 5% of the transcripts are generated from the TATA-containing promoter. If the change in TATA-box utilization for the eIF-1A reflects an underlying global change in TATA-box utilization, a dramatic change in promoter utilization may occur during preimplantation development such that TATA-less promoters are more efficiently utilized. Such a change in promoter utilization could contribute significantly to the reprogramming of gene expression that occurs during the maternal-to-zygotic transition.

[1]  C. Hellen,et al.  Eukaryotic ribosomes require initiation factors 1 and 1A to locate initiation codons , 1998, Nature.

[2]  R. Tjian,et al.  Transcription from a TATA-less promoter requires a multisubunit TFIID complex. , 1991, Genes & development.

[3]  P. Wassarman,et al.  Program of early development in the mammal: changes in patterns and absolute rates of tubulin and total protein synthesis during oogenesis and early embryogenesis in the mouse. , 1979, Developmental biology.

[4]  M Plachot,et al.  Chromosome methylation patterns during mammalian preimplantation development. , 1998, Genes & development.

[5]  T. Hashimshony,et al.  DNA methylation models histone acetylation , 1998, Nature.

[6]  A. Wolffe,et al.  Chromatin disruption and modification. , 1999, Nucleic acids research.

[7]  L. Pikó,et al.  Size and specific activity of the UTP pool and overall rates of RNA synthesis in early mouse embryos. , 1977, Developmental biology.

[8]  Colin A. Johnson,et al.  Transcriptional repression by the methyl-CpG-binding protein MeCP2 involves a histone deacetylase complex , 1998, Nature.

[9]  R. Schultz,et al.  Analysis of gene expression in the preimplantation mouse embryo: use of mRNA differential display. , 1994, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[10]  R. Schultz,et al.  Role of the first round of DNA replication in reprogramming gene expression in the preimplantation mouse embryo , 1997, Molecular reproduction and development.

[11]  R. Schultz,et al.  Regulation of gene expression in the preimplantation mouse embryo: Temporal and spatial patterns of expression of the transcription factor Sp1 , 1997, Molecular reproduction and development.

[12]  P. Braude,et al.  The transition from maternal to embryonic control in the 2‐cell mouse embryo. , 1982, The EMBO journal.

[13]  M. DePamphilis,et al.  Requirements for promoter activity in mouse oocytes and embryos distinguish paternal pronuclei from maternal and zygotic nuclei. , 1993, Developmental biology.

[14]  H. Schöler,et al.  In line with our ancestors: Oct‐4 and the mammalian germ , 1998, BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology.

[15]  S. Lehnert,et al.  Temporal and regional changes in DNA methylation in the embryonic, extraembryonic and germ cell lineages during mouse embryo development. , 1987, Development.

[16]  P. Wassarman,et al.  Expression of simian virus 40 early and late genes in mouse oocytes and embryos , 1986, Journal of Virology.

[17]  A. Bird,et al.  DNA methylation and chromatin modification. , 1999, Current opinion in genetics & development.

[18]  T. Bestor,et al.  Gene silencing: Methylation meets acetylation , 1998, Nature.

[19]  S. Majumder,et al.  Lack of Enhancer Function in Mammals Is Unique to Oocytes and Fertilized Eggs* , 1999, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[20]  W. Reik,et al.  Methylation levels of maternal and paternal genomes during preimplantation development. , 1991, Development.

[21]  A. Bird CpG-rich islands and the function of DNA methylation , 1986, Nature.

[22]  M. DePamphilis,et al.  Repression of gene expression at the beginning of mouse development. , 1995, Developmental biology.

[23]  R. Schultz,et al.  Transient expression of translation initiation factor eIF-4C during the 2-cell stage of the preimplantation mouse embryo: identification by mRNA differential display and the role of DNA replication in zygotic gene activation. , 1996, Developmental biology.

[24]  Ruth R. Montgomery,et al.  Regulation of mouse oocyte meiotic maturation: implication of a decrease in oocyte cAMP and protein dephosphorylation in commitment to resume meiosis. , 1983, Developmental biology.

[25]  H. Schöler,et al.  Formation of Pluripotent Stem Cells in the Mammalian Embryo Depends on the POU Transcription Factor Oct4 , 1998, Cell.

[26]  J. Rossant,et al.  Experimental approaches to mammalian embryonic development: Molecular and biochemical aspects , 1987 .

[27]  R. Schultz,et al.  Mouse sperm-egg plasma membrane interactions: analysis of roles of egg integrins and the mouse sperm homologue of PH-30 (fertilin) beta. , 1995, Journal of cell science.

[28]  M. Szyf,et al.  A mammalian protein with specific demethylase activity for mCpG DNA , 1999, Nature.

[29]  F. Aoki,et al.  Regulation of transcriptional activity during the first and second cell cycles in the preimplantation mouse embryo. , 1997, Developmental biology.

[30]  J. Garrels,et al.  Quantitative analysis of protein synthesis in mouse embryos. I. Extensive reprogramming at the one- and two-cell stages. , 1991, Development.

[31]  R. Schultz,et al.  Transient expression of a translation initiation factor is conservatively associated with embryonic gene activation in murine and bovine embryos. , 1998, Biology of reproduction.

[32]  R. Schultz Regulation of zygotic gene activation in the mouse , 1993, BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology.

[33]  Y. Bergman,et al.  Extinction of Oct-3/4 gene expression in embryonal carcinoma x fibroblast somatic cell hybrids is accompanied by changes in the methylation status, chromatin structure, and transcriptional activity of the Oct-3/4 upstream region , 1993, Molecular and cellular biology.

[34]  R. Schultz,et al.  Regulation of mouse preimplantation development: inhibition of synthesis of proteins in the two-cell embryo that require transcription by inhibitors of cAMP-dependent protein kinase. , 1989, Developmental biology.

[35]  M. DePamphilis,et al.  TATA-dependent enhancer stimulation of promoter activity in mice is developmentally acquired , 1994, Molecular and cellular biology.

[36]  P. Kaye Experimental approaches to mammalian embryonic development: Metabolic aspects of the physiology of the preimplantation embryo , 1987 .

[37]  R. Schultz,et al.  Molecular cloning and expression of the mouse translation initiation factor eIF-1A. , 1998, Nucleic acids research.

[38]  J. Strouboulis,et al.  Methylated DNA and MeCP2 recruit histone deacetylase to repress transcription , 1998, Nature Genetics.

[39]  M. DePamphilis,et al.  Developmental acquisition of enhancer function requires a unique coactivator activity , 1997, The EMBO journal.