Combining Global and Local Grid-Based Bias Correction for Mesoscale Numerical Weather Prediction Models

Two methods for objective grid-based bias removal in mesoscale numerical weather prediction models are proposed, one global and one local. The global method is an elaboration of model output statistics (MOS), combining several modern methods for multiple regression: alternating conditional expectation (ACE), regression trees, and Bayesian model selection. This allows the representation of nonlinear aspects of the bias, and the selection of the important ones in an overall nonlinear but parsimonious statistical model. The local method is the method of neighbors, which estimates the bias as the average bias over the “neighbors” of the grid point and time point being forecast, consisting of recent observations at stations that are close geographically and have similar elevation and land use. A case study based on MM5 48-hour surface temperature forecasts over the US Pacific Northwest indicates a 26% to 40% reduction in the mean-squared error (MSE) for either method, or a combination thereof, as compared to unadjusted model output. The method of neighbors yields a greater reduction in MSE, but the regression method is more flexible in that it can be applied even to grid points that have no neighbors.

[1]  Caren Marzban,et al.  Neural Networks for Postprocessing Model Output: ARPS , 2003 .

[2]  Richard L. Pfeffer,et al.  Comparison of Methodologies for Probabilistic Quantitative Precipitation Forecasting , 2002 .

[3]  H. Glahn,et al.  Statistical Forecasts Based on the National Meteorological Center's Numerical Weather Prediction System , 1989 .

[4]  J. Friedman,et al.  Estimating Optimal Transformations for Multiple Regression and Correlation. , 1985 .

[5]  William R. Burrows Objective Guidance for 0–24-Hour and 24–48-Hour Mesoscale Forecasts of Lake-Effect Snow Using CART , 1991 .

[6]  David J. Stensrud,et al.  Gridpoint Predictions of High Temperature from a Mesoscale Model , 1996 .

[7]  Malik Beshir Malik,et al.  Applied Linear Regression , 2005, Technometrics.

[8]  H. Glahn,et al.  The Use of Model Output Statistics (MOS) in Objective Weather Forecasting , 1972 .

[9]  T. Gneiting Nonseparable, Stationary Covariance Functions for Space–Time Data , 2002 .

[10]  L. Wilson,et al.  The Canadian Updateable Model Output Statistics (UMOS) System: Validation against Perfect Prog , 2003 .

[11]  A. Raftery Bayesian Model Selection in Social Research , 1995 .

[12]  Clifford F. Mass,et al.  IFPS and the Future of the National Weather Service , 2003 .

[13]  R. Daley Atmospheric Data Analysis , 1991 .

[14]  Marcel Vallée,et al.  The Canadian Updateable Model Output Statistics (UMOS) System: Design and Development Tests , 2002 .

[15]  Robert L. Vislocky,et al.  Generalized Additive Models versus Linear Regression in Generating Probabilistic MOS Forecasts of Aviation Weather Parameters , 1995 .

[16]  A. Barros,et al.  Localized Precipitation Forecasts from a Numerical Weather Prediction Model Using Artificial Neural Networks , 1998 .

[17]  William W. Hsieh,et al.  An Adaptive Nonlinear MOS Scheme for Precipitation Forecasts Using Neural Networks , 2003 .

[18]  William R. Burrows,et al.  CART Decision-Tree Statistical Analysis and Prediction of Summer Season Maximum Surface Ozone for the Vancouver, Montreal, and Atlantic Regions of Canada , 1995 .

[19]  Richard T. McNider,et al.  An Optimal Model Output Calibration Algorithm Suitable for Objective Temperature Forecasting , 1999 .