Improved picture naming in aphasia patients treated with cathodal tDCS to inhibit the right Broca's homologue area.

PURPOSE Previous reports have suggested that noninvasive cortical stimulation could influence speech production in patients with chronic stroke. Here, we evaluated the hypothesis that cathodal transcranial DC stimulation (ctDCS), a technique that decreases excitability of stimulated cortical sites, applied over a healthy right Broca's homologue area could improve picture naming in patients with post-stroke aphasia. METHODS Ten right-handed patients with post-stroke aphasia were enrolled in this double blind, counterbalanced sham-controlled, crossover study. Each patient received an intervention of ctDCS (2 mA for 20 min) and of sham tDCS (2 mA for 1 min) daily for 5 consecutive days in a randomized crossover manner with a minimum interval of one week between interventions, over a healthy right Broca's homologue area using a left supraorbital anode and simultaneous daily sessions of conventional word-retrieval training. The primary endpoint measure of this study was a standardized, validated Korean version of the Boston Naming Test, which is a measure of picture naming skills. RESULTS ctDCS was not found to have any adverse effects. Furthermore, significantly improved picture naming (p = 0.02) was observed at 1 hour following the last (5th) ctDCS treatment session, but no changes were observed after sham tDCS. CONCLUSION These results demonstrate that cathodal tDCS over the right healthy Broca's homologue area with a left supraorbital anodal location can improve picture naming task performance in post-stroke aphasia.

[1]  L. Cohen,et al.  Mechanisms underlying recovery of motor function after stroke. , 2004, Postgraduate medical journal.

[2]  Sergio P. Rigonatti,et al.  Transcranial direct current stimulation of the unaffected hemisphere in stroke patients , 2005, Neuroreport.

[3]  Sergio P. Rigonatti,et al.  Repeated sessions of noninvasive brain DC stimulation is associated with motor function improvement in stroke patients. , 2007, Restorative neurology and neuroscience.

[4]  Jacquie Kurland,et al.  Overt naming fMRI pre- and post-TMS: Two nonfluent aphasia patients, with and without improved naming post-TMS , 2007, Brain and Language.

[5]  N. Kapur.  Paradoxical functional facilitation in brain-behaviour research. A critical review. , 1996, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[6]  Daniel M. Branco,et al.  Object naming is a more sensitive measure of speech localization than number counting: Converging evidence from direct cortical stimulation and fMRI , 2007, NeuroImage.

[7]  Á. Pascual-Leone,et al.  Improved picture naming in chronic aphasia after TMS to part of right Broca’s area: An open-protocol study , 2005, Brain and Language.

[8]  E. Bisiach,et al.  rTMS of the unaffected hemisphere transiently reduces contralesional visuospatial hemineglect , 2001, Neurology.

[9]  M. Corbetta,et al.  Neural correlates of recovery from aphasia after damage to left inferior frontal cortex , 2000, Neurology.

[10]  Masako Okamoto,et al.  Three-dimensional probabilistic anatomical cranio-cerebral correlation via the international 10–20 system oriented for transcranial functional brain mapping , 2004, NeuroImage.

[11]  Uwe Herwig,et al.  Using the International 10-20 EEG System for Positioning of Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation , 2004, Brain Topography.

[12]  Ichiro Watanabe,et al.  Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation of Contralesional Primary Motor Cortex Improves Hand Function After Stroke , 2005, Stroke.

[13]  Sergio P. Rigonatti,et al.  A sham stimulation-controlled trial of rTMS of the unaffected hemisphere in stroke patients , 2005, Neurology.

[14]  A. Friederici,et al.  First-Pass versus Second-Pass Parsing Processes in a Wernicke's and a Broca's Aphasic: Electrophysiological Evidence for a Double Dissociation , 1998, Brain and Language.

[15]  B. Rockstroh,et al.  Extending the Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy (CIMT) approach to cognitive functions: Constraint-Induced Aphasia Therapy (CIAT) of chronic aphasia. , 2007, NeuroRehabilitation.

[16]  D. Purpura,et al.  INTRACELLULAR ACTIVITIES AND EVOKED POTENTIAL CHANGES DURING POLARIZATION OF MOTOR CORTEX. , 1965, Journal of neurophysiology.

[17]  M. Kinsbourne,et al.  A model for the mechanism of unilateral neglect of space. , 1970, Transactions of the American Neurological Association.

[18]  R L Hewer,et al.  Aphasia after stroke: natural history and associated deficits. , 1986, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[19]  Jordan Grafman,et al.  Recharging cognition with DC brain polarization , 2005, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[20]  C. Shewan.  The Language Quotient (LQ): a new measure for the Western Aphasia Battery. , 1986, Journal of communication disorders.

[21]  Y. Samson,et al.  Recovery from nonfluent aphasia after melodic intonation therapy , 1996, Neurology.

[22]  Federico Turkheimer,et al.  Speech production after stroke: The role of the right pars opercularis , 2003, Annals of neurology.

[23]  L. Cohen,et al.  Effects of non-invasive cortical stimulation on skilled motor function in chronic stroke. , 2005, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[24]  L. Cohen,et al.  Non-invasive brain stimulation: a new strategy to improve neurorehabilitation after stroke? , 2006, The Lancet Neurology.

[25]  L. Cohen,et al.  Enhancing encoding of a motor memory in the primary motor cortex by cortical stimulation. , 2004, Journal of neurophysiology.

[26]  S. Cappa,et al.  Improved naming after transcranial direct current stimulation in aphasia , 2007, Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry.

[27]  Keith D. White,et al.  Regional changes in word-production laterality after a naming treatment designed to produce a rightward shift in frontal activity , 2009, Brain and Language.

[28]  K. Shindo,et al.  Long-term effect of low-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation over the unaffected posterior parietal cortex in patients with unilateral spatial neglect. , 2006, Journal of rehabilitation medicine.

[29]  Ethan R. Buch,et al.  Noninvasive cortical stimulation enhances motor skill acquisition over multiple days through an effect on consolidation , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[30]  E. Bisiach,et al.  1 Hz repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation of the unaffected hemisphere ameliorates contralesional visuospatial neglect in humans , 2003, Neuroscience Letters.

[31]  L. Cohen,et al.  Transcranial DC stimulation (tDCS): A tool for double-blind sham-controlled clinical studies in brain stimulation , 2006, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[32]  T. Olsen,et al.  Aphasia after Stroke: Type, Severity and Prognosis , 2003, Cerebrovascular Diseases.

[33]  A. Kertesz,et al.  The Aphasia Quotient: The Taxonomic Approach to Measurement of Aphasic Disability , 2004, Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences / Journal Canadien des Sciences Neurologiques.

[34]  J. L. Flanagan,et al.  Test-retest reliability of three aphasia tests: performance of non-brain-damaged older adults. , 1997, Journal of communication disorders.

[35]  R. C. Oldfield.  The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. , 1971, Neuropsychologia.

[36]  Harold Goodglass,et al.  Overt propositional speech in chronic nonfluent aphasia studied with the dynamic susceptibility contrast fMRI method , 2004, NeuroImage.

[37]  M. Nitsche,et al.  Excitability changes induced in the human motor cortex by weak transcranial direct current stimulation , 2000, The Journal of physiology.

[38]  R. Woods,et al.  Recovery from wernicke's aphasia: A positron emission tomographic study , 1995, Annals of neurology.

[39]  Steven D. Freedman,et al.  A Sham-Controlled Trial of a 5-Day Course of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation of the Unaffected Hemisphere in Stroke Patients , 2006, Stroke.

[40]  Walter Paulus,et al.  Modulation of cortical excitability by weak direct current stimulation--technical, safety and functional aspects. , 2003, Supplements to Clinical neurophysiology.