Smartphone apps for urolithiasis

There are an increasing number of healthcare smartphone applications (‘apps’) available. Urolithiasis presents a major healthcare burden. Patients are increasingly keen to educate themselves regarding the diagnosis and management of their condition. There is no formal regulation of healthcare apps, including a large number of apps relating to urolithiasis. This review aims to examine the range of apps available, and the prevalence of healthcare professional input. Four international smartphone app stores were searched: Apple’s App Store, Google Play (Android), BlackBerry App World and the Windows Phone App store. A total of 42 unique apps were downloaded and analysed. Recorded data included the cost (£/$), publisher information, number of ratings, average rating and any documentation of medical professional involvement. Twenty-one (50 %) apps required payment for download. The mean cost was £3.58 ($6.04) with range £0.61–£34.90 ($1.03–$58.87). Thirty-three (79 %) of the 42 apps were designed to be used by patients. Fifteen (36 %) of the 42 apps had clear input from health professionals. Twenty-two apps offered patient information, including dietary advice on lowering calcium intake, which is contrary to current evidence-based practice. We conclude that urolithiasis apps have future potential to inform both patients and healthcare professionals on stone management. However, inaccuracies in the recommendations made by some apps can be misleading or even harmful due to a lack of specialist involvement. We recommend improving the usefulness of these apps by seeking a ‘quality stamp’ from recognised urological organisations and greater clinician involvement in future app development.

[1]  G. Curhan,et al.  Time trends in reported prevalence of kidney stones in the United States: 1976-1994. , 2003, Kidney international.

[2]  Chia-Chin Chong,et al.  From Mobile Phones to Personal Wellness Dashboards , 2010, IEEE Pulse.

[3]  P. Dasgupta,et al.  UROLOGY APPS: A REVIEW OF ALL APPS AVAILABLE FOR UROLOGISTS , 2012, BJU international.

[4]  D. Assimos,et al.  Kidney stones: a global picture of prevalence, incidence, and associated risk factors. , 2010, Reviews in urology.

[5]  Letter From America iPhone and iPad applications for plastic surgeons , 2011 .

[6]  N. Howes,et al.  Obesity Surgery Smartphone Apps: a Review , 2013, Obesity Surgery.

[7]  Orrin I. Franko,et al.  Smartphone Apps for Orthopaedic Surgeons , 2011, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[8]  A. Hamilton,et al.  Medical professional involvement in smartphone ‘apps’ in dermatology , 2012, The British journal of dermatology.

[9]  S. White,et al.  Survey of iPhone usage among anaesthetists in England , 2011, Anaesthesia.

[10]  Amy J Barton,et al.  The regulation of mobile health applications , 2012, BMC Medicine.

[11]  Joel J. P. C. Rodrigues,et al.  Mobile-health: A review of current state in 2015 , 2015, J. Biomed. Informatics.

[12]  A. Monteiro Mobile health , 2014, Radiologia brasileira.

[13]  R. Brady,et al.  Colorectal smartphone apps: opportunities and risks , 2012, Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland.

[14]  B. Kapp,et al.  A history and theory of informed consent , 1986 .

[15]  R. Moran,et al.  Internet use and seeking health information online in Ireland: demographic characteristics and mental health characteristics of users and non-users. , 2008 .

[16]  S. Nakada,et al.  Re : Development of an Instrument to Assess the Health Related Quality of Life of Kidney Stone Formers , 2014 .

[17]  C. Eccleston,et al.  Smartphone applications for pain management , 2011, Journal of telemedicine and telecare.

[18]  J. Reynard,et al.  Trends in urological stone disease , 2012, BJU international.