Powered prosthesis control during walking, sitting, standing, and non-weight bearing activities using neural and mechanical inputs

Lower limb prostheses that can generate near physiological joint power have the potential to improve the way amputees go about their activities of daily living. Amputees who have lost both their knee and ankle would also benefit from a system that allowed them to easily perform sit-to-stand and stand-to-sit movements, reposition their prosthesis using neural control, and intuitively transition between these modes of operation and walking. In this study, we developed such a system and evaluated it with two transfemoral amputees. Both amputees were able to stand up and sit down comfortably using the powered prosthesis. Two neural control systems were configured using a linear discriminant analysis classifier trained from data recorded from eight residual thigh muscles. One classifier, trained to recognize when amputees sat down from walking mode, was on average 96.5% accurate. A second classifier, trained to recognize amputees' intent to reposition the knee and ankle joints, was on average 87.3% accurate. This integrated control system allowing transfemoral amputees to walk as well as perform weight transfers (sitting down and standing up) and seated non-weight bearing activities demonstrates an advancement towards improving the performance and viability of powered prostheses during daily use.

[1]  Michael Goldfarb,et al.  Powered sit-to-stand and assistive stand-to-sit framework for a powered transfemoral prosthesis , 2009, 2009 IEEE International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics.

[2]  M. Goldfarb,et al.  Control of Stair Ascent and Descent With a Powered Transfemoral Prosthesis , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[3]  Robert D. Lipschutz,et al.  Targeted muscle reinnervation for real-time myoelectric control of multifunction artificial arms. , 2009, JAMA.

[4]  J. Czerniecki,et al.  Comparison of the Power Knee and C-Leg during step-up and sit-to-stand tasks. , 2013, Gait & Posture.

[5]  Michael Goldfarb,et al.  Upslope Walking With a Powered Knee and Ankle Prosthesis: Initial Results With an Amputee Subject , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[6]  Helena Burger,et al.  Transition from Sitting to Standing after Trans-Femoral Amputation , 2005, Prosthetics and orthotics international.

[7]  Hugh M. Herr,et al.  Powered ankle-foot prosthesis to assist level-ground and stair-descent gaits , 2008, Neural Networks.

[8]  Kevin B. Englehart,et al.  A robust, real-time control scheme for multifunction myoelectric control , 2003, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[9]  Michael Goldfarb,et al.  Volitional Control of a Prosthetic Knee Using Surface Electromyography , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[10]  H.A. Varol,et al.  Preliminary Evaluations of a Self-Contained Anthropomorphic Transfemoral Prosthesis , 2009, IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics.

[11]  Nicholas P. Fey,et al.  Strategies to reduce the configuration time for a powered knee and ankle prosthesis across multiple ambulation modes , 2013, 2013 IEEE 13th International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics (ICORR).

[12]  R.N. Scott,et al.  A new strategy for multifunction myoelectric control , 1993, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[13]  T.G. Sugar,et al.  SPARKy 3: Design of an active robotic ankle prosthesis with two actuated degrees of freedom using regenerative kinetics , 2008, 2008 2nd IEEE RAS & EMBS International Conference on Biomedical Robotics and Biomechatronics.

[14]  A. M. Simon,et al.  Real-time myoelectric control of knee and ankle motions for transfemoral amputees. , 2011, JAMA.