Re-purposing existing generic games and simulations for e-learning

There is a growing interest among teachers in using games as a part of their lesson plans. A standardised, interoperable approach to the sharing of such game-based lesson plans would allow teachers and educational technologists to compare and contrast Digital Game Based Learning scenarios, allowing best practices and lessons learned to emerge. Although games can be used as 'add-ons' in educational contexts, greater benefits can be attained by integrating games more fully into the educational process, i.e. by repurposing existing games to target the specific learning objectives. In this article we analyse this problem. We developed two possible solutions based on the integration and the interaction of games and learning scenarios. The first solution is based on 'pedagogical wrappers', where games are linked to e-learning flows but without interaction and communication. The second solution sees a tighter integration which supports ongoing interaction and communication between game and e-learning flow. We applied both solutions to a generic game. This game was firstly programmed in Action Script and later re-used for learning purposes and represented in IMS Learning Design. We analysed the pros and cons of each solution and identify research topics for further research.

[1]  I. Sigel Play, dreams and imitation in childhood. , 1953 .

[2]  Griff Richards Designing Educational Games , 2005 .

[3]  K. Squire Changing the Game: What Happens When Video Games Enter the Classroom? , 2005 .

[4]  Colin Tattersall,et al.  How to use IMS Learning Design and SCORM 2004 together , 2005 .

[5]  Katie Salen,et al.  Rules of play: game design fundamentals , 2003 .

[6]  R. Caillois,et al.  Man, Play and Games , 1958 .

[7]  Paul Cobb,et al.  Participating in Classroom Mathematical Practices , 2001 .

[8]  Bernard Perron,et al.  The Video GameTheory Reader , 2003 .

[9]  Colin Tattersall,et al.  EML and IMS Learning Design: from LO to LA , 2003 .

[10]  R. Caillois Les jeux et les hommes : le masque et le vertige , 1967 .

[11]  Daniel Burgos,et al.  Learning Design: A handbook on modelling and delivering networked education and training , 2005 .

[12]  J. Moran-Ellis The ambiguity of play , 1998 .

[13]  J. Piaget Play, dreams and imitation in childhood , 1951 .

[14]  Eugene F. Provenzo,et al.  Video Kids: Making Sense of Nintendo , 1991 .

[15]  Markku Eskelinen,et al.  The Gaming Situation , 2001, Game Stud..

[16]  Chris Crawford,et al.  The Art of Computer Game Design , 1984 .

[17]  J. P. Gee,et al.  What Would a State of the Art Instructional Video Game Look like , 2005 .

[18]  Rob Koper,et al.  Modeling units of study from a pedagogical perspective: the pedagogical meta-model behind EML , 2001 .

[19]  Lloyd P. Rieber,et al.  Seriously considering play: Designing interactive learning environments based on the blending of microworlds, simulations, and games , 1996 .

[20]  Colin Tattersall,et al.  Preface to Learning Design: A Handbook on Modelling and Delivering Networked Education and Training , 2005 .

[21]  K. Squire,et al.  Replaying History: Engaging Urban Underserved Students in Learning World History Through Computer Simulation Games , 2004, ICLS.

[22]  Bernard Perron,et al.  The Video Game Theory Reader 2 , 2003 .

[23]  Michele D. Dickey Engaging by design: How engagement strategies in popular computer and video games can inform instructional design , 2005 .

[24]  David Griffiths,et al.  The UNFOLD Project. Understanding and using Learning Design , 2005 .

[25]  Lauren Cruikshank,et al.  The Video Game Theory Reader , 2006 .

[26]  S. Turkle Life on the Screen: Identity in the Age of the Internet , 1997 .

[27]  Diana Laurillard,et al.  Multimedia and the learner's experience of narrative , 1998, Comput. Educ..