Individual Preferences and Social Interactions Determine the Aggregation of Woodlice

Background The aggregation of woodlice in dark and moist places is considered an adaptation to land life and most studies are focused on its functionality or on the behavioural mechanisms related to the individual's response to abiotic factors. Until now, no clear experimental demonstration was available about aggregation resulting from inter-attraction between conspecifics. Methodology/Main Findings We present the dynamics of aggregation, not previously described in detail in literature, as being independent of the experimental conditions: homogeneous and heterogeneous environments with identical or different shelters. Indeed whatever these conditions, the aggregation is very quick. In less than 10 minutes more than 50% of woodlice were aggregated in several small groups in the homogeneous environment or under shelters in the heterogeneous environment. After this fast aggregation, woodlice progressively moved into a single aggregate or under one shelter. Conclusions/Significance Here we show for the first time that aggregation in woodlice implies a strong social component and results from a trade-off between individual preferences and inter-attraction between individuals. Moreover, our results reveal that the response to the heterogeneities affects only the location of the aggregates and not the level of aggregation, and demonstrate the strong inter-attraction between conspecifics which can outweigh individual preferences. This inter-attraction can lead to situations that could seem sub-optimal.

[1]  Prof. Dr. Michael R. Warburg Evolutionary Biology of Land Isopods , 1993, Springer Berlin Heidelberg.

[2]  A. Dussutour,et al.  Collective decision-making and behavioral polymorphism in group living organisms. , 2008, Journal of theoretical biology.

[3]  Mathieu Lihoreau,et al.  Kin recognition via cuticular hydrocarbons shapes cockroach social life , 2009 .

[4]  F. Hendrickx,et al.  Storage mediums affect metal concentration in woodlice (Isopoda). , 2003, Environmental pollution.

[5]  N. Takeda,et al.  The aggregation phenomenon in terrestrial isopods , 1984 .

[6]  J. Emmett Duffy,et al.  Evolutionary ecology of social and sexual systems : crustaceans as model organisms , 2007 .

[7]  J. Deneubourg,et al.  Trail laying behaviour during food recruitment in the antLasius niger (L.) , 1992, Insectes Sociaux.

[8]  C. P. Friedlander Aggregation inOniscus asellus Linn. , 1965 .

[9]  C. Detrain,et al.  Foraging responses of the aphid tending ant Lasius niger to spatio-temporal changes in aphid colonies Cinara cedri , 2005 .

[10]  Claire Detrain,et al.  Out of sight but not out of mind: modulation of recruitment according to home range marking in ants , 2004, Animal Behaviour.

[11]  H. P. Nooteboom,et al.  OLFACTORY ORIENTATION IN SOME LAND‐ISOPODS (ONISCOIDEA, CRUSTACEA) , 1963 .

[12]  Jean-Louis Deneubourg,et al.  Effect of social and environmental factors on ant aggregation: a general response? , 2008, Journal of insect physiology.

[13]  W. C. Allee Studies in Animal Aggregations: Natural Aggregations of the Isopod, Asellus Communis , 1929 .

[14]  Tim Kovacs,et al.  Weighting waiting in collective decision-making , 2006, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[15]  JEAN-LOUIS DENEUBOURG,et al.  Positive Feedback, Convergent Collective Patterns, and Social Transitions in Arthropods , 2009, Organization of Insect Societies.

[16]  Jean-Louis Deneubourg,et al.  Complex dynamics based on a quorum: decision-making process by cockroaches in a patchy environment. , 2009 .

[17]  Etienne b. Rabaud Phénomène social et sociétés animales , 1937 .

[18]  Anna Dornhaus,et al.  Speed versus accuracy in collective decision making , 2003, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[19]  K. E. Linsenmair,et al.  Comparative studies on the social behaviour of the desert isopod Hemilepistus reaumuri and of a Porcellio species , 1984 .

[20]  D. L. Gunn The Humidity Reactions of the Wood-louse, Porcellio scaber (Latreille) , 1937 .

[21]  D.,et al.  THE EVOLUTION OF SOCIAL BEHAVIOR , 2002 .

[22]  T. Carefoot Physiology of terrestrial isopods , 1993 .

[23]  M. Zimmer Nutrition in terrestrial isopods (Isopoda: Oniscidea): an evolutionary‐ecological approach , 2002, Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.

[24]  E. Bonabeau,et al.  Spatial patterns in ant colonies , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[25]  Jonathan C. Wright,et al.  Water vapour absorption in terrestrial isopods , 1990 .

[26]  J. Emmett Duffy,et al.  Evolutionary Ecology of Social and Sexual Systems , 2007 .

[27]  W. Hamner,et al.  Regularly spaced rows of medusae in the Bering Sea: Role of Langmuir circulation1 , 1986 .

[28]  E. Rodrigues,et al.  Degradation of Leaf Litter Phenolics by Aquatic and Terrestrial Isopods , 2005, Journal of Chemical Ecology.

[29]  L. Dugatkin Cooperation Among Animals: An Evolutionary Perspective , 1997 .

[30]  Jean-Louis Deneubourg,et al.  Personality and collective decision-making in foraging herbivores , 2010, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[31]  J. Yoder,et al.  Group influence on water conservation in the giant Madagascar hissing‐cockroach, Gromphadorhina portentosa (Dictyoptera: Blaberidae) , 1997 .

[32]  W. C. Allee Studies in animal aggregations: Causes and effects of bunching in land isopods , 1926 .

[33]  M. Warburg Behavioral Adaptations of Terrestrial Isopods , 1968 .

[34]  José Halloy,et al.  Collegial decision making based on social amplification leads to optimal group formation. , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[35]  M. Hassall,et al.  The existence of an Allee effect in populations of Porcellio scaber (Isopoda: Oniscidea) , 2005 .

[36]  T. Caraco,et al.  Social Foraging Theory , 2018 .

[37]  J. Deneubourg,et al.  Probabilistic behaviour in ants: A strategy of errors? , 1983 .

[38]  E. Glass,et al.  Short communication. Clustering reduces water loss by adult American house dust mites Dermatophagoides farinae (Acari: Pyroglyphidae) , 2004, Experimental & Applied Acarology.

[39]  G. Wendler,et al.  Aggregation Agents in German Cockroach Blattella germanica: Examination of Efficacy , 1999, Journal of Chemical Ecology.

[40]  W. Topp,et al.  Olfaction in terrestrial isopods (Crustacea: Oniscidea) : responses of Porcellio scaber to the odour of litter , 1996 .

[41]  P. Ganter The Effects of Crowding on Terrestrial Isopods , 1984 .

[42]  Guy Theraulaz,et al.  Self-Organization in Biological Systems , 2001, Princeton studies in complexity.

[43]  E. Edney Transition from Water to Land in Isopod Crustaceans , 1968 .

[44]  D. Dewsbury Behavioural ecology: An evolutionary approach. , 1979 .

[45]  M. Warburg The response of isopods towards temperature, humidity and light , 1964 .

[46]  E. Despland,et al.  Plasticity in Forest Tent Caterpillar Collective Foraging Schedules , 2006 .

[47]  J. Deneubourg,et al.  Modulation of trail laying in the antLasius niger (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) and its role in the collective selection of a food source , 1993, Journal of Insect Behavior.

[48]  E. Despland,et al.  Social Cues and Following Behavior in the Forest Tent Caterpillar , 2005, Journal of Insect Behavior.

[49]  S Stöcker,et al.  Models for tuna school formation. , 1999, Mathematical biosciences.

[50]  E. Wilson,et al.  The Superorganism: The Beauty, Elegance, and Strangeness of Insect Societies , 2008 .

[51]  J. Deneubourg,et al.  Conspecific Attraction and Shelter Selection in Gregarious Insects , 2007, The American Naturalist.

[52]  Charles Harlan Abbott,et al.  Reactions of land isopods to light , 1918 .

[53]  Craig Packer,et al.  Group formation stabilizes predator–prey dynamics , 2007, Nature.

[54]  Claire Detrain,et al.  Self-amplification as a source of interindividual variability: shelter selection in cockroaches. , 2009, Journal of insect physiology.

[55]  Thomas J Valone,et al.  Public information for the assessment of quality: a widespread social phenomenon. , 2002, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[56]  M. Paoletti,et al.  Woodlice (Isopoda: Oniscidea): their potential for assessing sustainability and use as bioindicators , 1999 .

[57]  W. Wieser,et al.  Patterns in the release of gaseous ammonia by terrestrial isopods , 1969, Oecologia.

[58]  Styron ECOLOGY OF TWO POPULATIONS OF AN AQUATIC ISOPOD (LIRCEUS FONTINALIS RAF.), WITH EMPHASIS ON IONIZING RADIATION EFFECTS. , 1968 .

[59]  D. Miličić,et al.  Evolutionary Ecology of Social and Sexual Systems: Crustaceans as Model Organisms , 2012 .

[60]  C. Detrain,et al.  How does food distance influence foraging in the ant Lasius niger: the importance of home-range marking , 2005, Insectes Sociaux.

[61]  James T. Costa,et al.  The Other Insect Societies , 2006 .

[62]  F Mondada,et al.  Social Integration of Robots into Groups of Cockroaches to Control Self-Organized Choices , 2007, Science.

[63]  J. Deneubourg,et al.  Dynamics of Aggregation and Emergence of Cooperation , 2002, The Biological Bulletin.

[64]  S. Pennings,et al.  Species‐specific patterns of litter processing by terrestrial isopods (Isopoda: Oniscidea) in high intertidal salt marshes and coastal forests , 2002 .

[65]  Cecil Paul Friedlander,et al.  Thigmokinesis in woodlice , 1964 .

[66]  J. Gascoigne,et al.  Allee Effects in Ecology and Conservation , 2008 .

[67]  C. E. Styron,et al.  Ecology of an Aquatic Isopod, Lirceus fontinalis Raf., Emphasizing Radiation Effects , 1967 .

[68]  J. Deneubourg,et al.  Self-organized aggregation in cockroaches , 2005, Animal Behaviour.

[69]  C. P. Friedlander Aggregation in Oniscus asellus Linn. , 1965, Animal behaviour.

[70]  J. Weeks,et al.  Altered locomotory behavior in woodlice (Oniscus asellus (L.)) collected at a polluted site , 1997 .

[71]  I. Giardina Collective Animal Behavior David J.T. Sumpter Collective Animal Behavior , 2011, Animal Behaviour.

[72]  Animal Aggregations. , 1931, Nature.

[73]  Edward Osborne Wilson,et al.  Cockroaches: Ecology, Behavior, and Natural History , 2007 .

[74]  J. Deneubourg,et al.  Emerging patterns and food recruitment in ants: an analytical study , 1999, Journal of theoretical biology.

[75]  Edward O. Wilson,et al.  Organization of Insect Societies: From Genome to Sociocomplexity , 2009 .

[76]  M. Hassall,et al.  Predicting the effect of climate change on aggregation behaviour in four species of terrestrial isopods , 2010 .

[77]  K. Linsenmair Sociobiology of Terrestrial Isopods , 2007 .

[78]  Jean-Louis Deneubourg,et al.  Error, communication and learning in ant societies , 1987 .

[79]  J. Deneubourg,et al.  Discrete dragline attachment induces aggregation in spiderlings of a solitary species , 2004, Animal Behaviour.