Large Binocular Telescope Adaptive Optics System: new achievements and perspectives in adaptive optics

The Large Binocular Telescope (LBT) is a unique telescope featuring two co-mounted optical trains with 8.4m primary mirrors. The telescope Adaptive Optics (AO) system uses two innovative key components, namely an adaptive secondary mirror with 672 actuators and a high-order pyramid wave-front sensor. During the on-sky commissioning such a system reached performances never achieved before on large ground-based optical telescopes. Images with 40mas resolution and Strehl Ratios higher than 80% have been acquired in H band (1.6 μm). Such images showed a contrast as high as 10-4. Based on these results, we compare the performances offered by a Natural Guide Star (NGS) system upgraded with the state-of-the-art technology and those delivered by existing Laser Guide Star (LGS) systems. The comparison, in terms of sky coverage and performances, suggests rethinking the current role ascribed to NGS and LGS in the next generation of AO systems for the 8-10 meter class telescopes and Extremely Large Telescopes (ELTs).

[1]  Douglas M. Summers,et al.  The W. M. Keck Observatory Laser Guide Star Adaptive Optics System: Performance Characterization , 2006 .

[2]  Christophe Verinaud,et al.  On the nature of the measurements provided by a pyramid wave-front sensor , 2004 .

[3]  Armando Riccardi,et al.  Laboratory characterization and performance of the high-order adaptive optics system for the Large Binocular Telescope , 2010 .

[4]  David G. Sandler,et al.  Adaptive optics for diffraction-limited infrared imaging with 8-m telescopes , 1994 .

[5]  R. Ragazzoni.  Pupil plane wavefront sensing with an oscillating prism , 1996 .

[6]  R. Foy,et al.  Adaptive telescope with laser probe : isoplanatism and cone effect , 1990 .

[7]  Walter Seifert,et al.  LUCIFER: a Multi-Mode NIR Instrument for the LBT , 2003, SPIE Astronomical Telescopes + Instrumentation.

[8]  S. Esposito,et al.  Pyramid Wavefront Sensor behavior in partial correction Adaptive Optic systems , 2001 .

[9]  Mark Chun,et al.  Optical Turbulence Profiles at Mauna Kea Measured by MASS and SCIDAR , 2005 .

[10]  Thierry Fusco,et al.  NAOS on-line characterization of turbulence parameters and adaptive optics performance , 2004 .

[11]  M. Giavalisco,et al.  Lyman Break Galaxies at Redshift z ~ 3: Survey Description and Full Data Set , 2003, astro-ph/0305378.

[12]  Armando Riccardi,et al.  First light AO (FLAO) system for LBT: final integration, acceptance test in Europe, and preliminary on-sky commissioning results , 2010, Astronomical Telescopes + Instrumentation.

[13]  Armando Riccardi,et al.  First light AO (FLAO) system for LBT: performance analysis and optimization , 2010, Astronomical Telescopes + Instrumentation.

[14]  Armando Riccardi,et al.  A deformable secondary mirror for the VLT , 2006, SPIE Astronomical Telescopes + Instrumentation.

[15]  Andrei Tokovinin,et al.  From Differential Image Motion to Seeing , 2002 .

[16]  Tom Herbst,et al.  An instrument for commissioning the active and adaptive optics of modern telescopes: the Infrared Test Camera for the Large Binocular Telescope , 2011 .

[17]  R. Ragazzoni,et al.  Sensitivity of a pyramidic Wave Front sensor in closed loop Adaptive Optics , 1999 .

[18]  Armando Riccardi,et al.  The adaptive secondary mirror for the Large Binocular Telescope: optical acceptance test and preliminary on-sky commissioning results , 2010, Astronomical Telescopes + Instrumentation.

[19]  Armando Riccardi,et al.  Low-light-level charge-coupled devices for pyramid wavefront sensing on 8 m class telescopes: what actual gain? , 2010 .

[20]  Tyson Hare,et al.  The Magellan Telescope Adaptive Secondary AO System: a visible and mid-IR AO facility , 2010, Astronomical Telescopes + Instrumentation.

[21]  J. H. Slagle,et al.  The Large Binocular Telescope , 2010, Other Conferences.