The Dynamics of the Discrete Ultimatum Game and the Role of the Expectation Level

We have studied evolutionary ultimatum game with spatially arranged players, who have choice between the two kinds of strategies (named greedy and altruist). The strategies in the ultimatum game here are described by and , that is, the probability of offering to himself and the accepting probability when receiving . By using computer simulations with C

[1]  Claudia Civai,et al.  Rejecting unfairness: emotion-driven reaction or cognitive heuristic? , 2013, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[2]  M. Nowak,et al.  THE SPATIAL DILEMMAS OF EVOLUTION , 1993 .

[3]  Zhen Wang,et al.  Heterogeneous Aspirations Promote Cooperation in the Prisoner's Dilemma Game , 2010, PloS one.

[4]  H Eugene Stanley,et al.  Fairness emergence from zero-intelligence agents. , 2010, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[5]  Axel Ockenfels,et al.  Is it all about the self? The effect of self-control depletion on ultimatum game proposers , 2013, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[6]  Jeffrey C Schank,et al.  Evolution of fairness in the dictator game by multilevel selection. , 2015, Journal of theoretical biology.

[7]  David G. Rand,et al.  Evolution of fairness in the one-shot anonymous Ultimatum Game , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[8]  M. Nowak,et al.  A generalized adaptive dynamics framework can describe the evolutionary Ultimatum Game. , 2001, Journal of theoretical biology.

[9]  Genki Ichinose,et al.  Coevolution of role preference and fairness in the ultimatum game , 2012, Complex..

[10]  M. Nowak,et al.  The spatial ultimatum game , 2000, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[11]  Attila Szolnoki,et al.  Accuracy in strategy imitations promotes the evolution of fairness in the spatial ultimatum game , 2012, 1211.1964.

[12]  Long Wang,et al.  Promotion of cooperation induced by appropriate payoff aspirations in a small-world networked game. , 2008, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[13]  M. Kuperman,et al.  The effect of the topology on the spatial ultimatum game , 2007, 0711.2165.

[14]  Long Wang,et al.  Promote or hinder? The role of punishment in the emergence of cooperation. , 2015, Journal of theoretical biology.

[15]  Wansheng Tang,et al.  The coevolutionary ultimatum game on different network topologies , 2011 .

[16]  S. Vaidyanathan,et al.  Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society , 2015 .

[17]  M. Nowak,et al.  Empathy leads to fairness , 2002, Bulletin of mathematical biology.

[18]  U. Fischbacher,et al.  The nature of human altruism , 2003, Nature.

[19]  E. Fehr.  A Theory of Fairness, Competition and Cooperation , 1998 .

[20]  M. Dishon-Berkovits,et al.  The ultimatum game: Discrete vs. continuous offers , 2014 .

[21]  Gengui Zhou,et al.  A network growth model based on the evolutionary ultimatum game , 2012 .

[22]  G. Szabó,et al.  Defense mechanisms of empathetic players in the spatial ultimatum game. , 2012, Physical review letters.

[23]  M. Nowak,et al.  Fairness versus reason in the ultimatum game. , 2000, Science.

[24]  Wansheng Tang,et al.  Coevolution of Structure and Strategy Promoting Fairness in the Ultimatum Game , 2011 .

[25]  Il Hong Suh,et al.  Degree-based assignation of roles in ultimatum games on scale-free networks , 2013 .

[26]  Roberto da Silva,et al.  Statistical fluctuations in population bargaining in the ultimatum game: static and evolutionary aspects. , 2009, Journal of theoretical biology.

[27]  Jes'us G'omez-Gardenes,et al.  The Ultimatum Game in complex networks , 2008, 0807.0750.

[28]  M. Rabin.  Published by: American , 2022 .

[29]  M. Nowak,et al.  Evolutionary games and spatial chaos , 1992, Nature.