Mesophilic and thermophilic temperature co-phase anaerobic digestion compared with single-stage mesophilic- and thermophilic digestion of sewage sludge.

The performance of thermophilic and mesophilic temperature co-phase anaerobic digestions for sewage sludge, using the exchange process of the digesting sludge between spatially separated mesophilic and thermophilic digesters, was examined, and compared to single-stage mesophilic and thermophilic anaerobic digestions. The reduction of volatile solids from the temperature co-phase anaerobic digestion system was dependent on the sludge exchange rate, but was 50.7-58.8%, which was much higher than 46.8% of single-stage thermophilic digestion, as well as 43.5% of the mesophilic digestion. The specific methane yield was 424-468 mL CH(4) per gram volatile solids removed, which was as good as that of single-stage mesophilic anaerobic digestion. The process stability and the effluent quality in terms of volatile fatty acids and soluble chemical oxygen demand of the temperature co-phase anaerobic digestion system were considerably better than those of the single-stage mesophilic anaerobic processes. The destruction of total coliform in the temperature co-phase system was 98.5-99.6%, which was similar to the single-stage thermophilic digestion. The higher performances on the volatile solid and pathogen reduction, and stable operation of the temperature co-phase anaerobic system might be attributable to the well-functioned thermophilic digester, sharing nutrients and intermediates for anaerobic microorganisms, and selection of higher substrate affinity anaerobic microorganisms in the co-phase system, as a result of the sludge exchange between the mesophilic and thermophilic digesters.

[1]  M. Legret,et al.  Permeable pavements: Pollution management tools , 1995 .

[2]  G. K. Anderson,et al.  Determination of bicarbonate and total volatile acid concentration in anaerobic digesters using a simple titration , 1992 .

[3]  V. Kuehn,et al.  Thermophilic and mesophilic operation of an anaerobic treatment of chicken slurry together with organic residual substances , 1999 .

[4]  Han-Qing Yu,et al.  Comparative performance of mesophilic and thermophilic acidogenic upflow reactors , 2002 .

[5]  C. Gallert,et al.  Mesophilic and thermophilic anaerobic digestion of source-sorted organic wastes: effect of ammonia on glucose degradation and methane production , 1997, Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology.

[6]  P. Weiland,et al.  Effect of temperature and pH on the kinetics of methane production, organic nitrogen and phosphorus removal in the batch anaerobic digestion process of cattle manure , 2000 .

[7]  T. Ellis,et al.  Effect of Varying Solids Concentration and Organic Loading on the Performance of Temperature Phased Anaerobic Digestion Process , 2002, Water environment research.

[8]  Herbert H. P. Fang,et al.  Anaerobic treatment of proteinaceous wastewater under mesophilic and thermophilic conditions , 1999 .

[9]  A. E. Greenberg,et al.  Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater : supplement to the sixteenth edition , 1988 .

[10]  N. Aoki,et al.  Development of High-Performance Thermophilic Two-Phase Digestion Process , 1991 .

[11]  R Borja,et al.  A kinetic study of anaerobic digestion of olive mill wastewater at mesophilic and thermophilic temperatures. , 1995, Environmental pollution.

[12]  R. Speece,et al.  Two-Phase, Two-Stage, and Single-Stage Anaerobic Process Comparison , 2001 .

[13]  Paul F. Greenfield,et al.  Estimating VFA concentrations in prefermenters by measuring pH , 1998 .

[14]  Pavel Jenicek,et al.  The activity of anaerobic biomass in thermophilic and mesophilic digesters at different loading rates , 2000 .

[15]  R. R. Dague,et al.  Temperature-phased anaerobic digestion of wastewater sludges , 1997 .

[16]  Qingliang Zhao,et al.  Thermophilic/mesophilic digestion of sewage sludge and organic wastes , 1996 .

[17]  J. Ahn.  A comparison of mesophilic and thermophilic anaerobic upflow filters , 2000 .

[18]  R. Speece,et al.  Effect of process configuration and substrate complexity on the performance of anaerobic processes. , 2001, Water Research.

[19]  A. V. Haandel.  Influence of the digested cod concentration on the alkalinity requirement in anaerobic digesters , 1994 .

[20]  P. Schafer,et al.  ADVANCED ANAEROBIC DIGESTION PERFORMANCE COMPARISONS , 2002 .

[21]  Dirk de Beer,et al.  The effect of pH profiles in methanogenic aggregates on the kinetics of acetate conversion , 1992 .

[22]  C. Forster,et al.  A thermophilic/mesophilic dual digestion system for treating waste activated sludge , 1999 .

[23]  Paul F. Greenfield,et al.  Effect of recycle on a two-phase high-rate anaerobic wastewater treatment system , 1994 .

[24]  J. V. Lier,et al.  Limitations of thermophilic anaerobic wastewater treatment and the consequences for process design , 2004, Antonie van Leeuwenhoek.

[25]  R. Speece,et al.  Comparative process stability and efficiency of anaerobic digestion; mesophilic vs. thermophilic. , 2002, Water research.