Determinants of multi-service smartcard success for smart cities development: A study based on citizens' privacy and security perceptions

Abstract Smart cities aim to increase their efficiency and quality-of-life thanks to technology-based services and collective intelligence. In this environment smartcards represent a strategic instrument to link citizens to public administration and local infrastructure to further advance on smart city plans. This research proposes a theoretical model and present privacy and security as key drivers of citizens’ intentions to continue using smartcards. The functional benefits (i.e. usefulness and ease-of-use), the level of personal interaction with local services, and the direct and moderating effects of socio-demographic variables complete our framework. The findings of an empirical study with smartcard users in Zaragoza (Spain) show usefulness and security as the main antecedents of continuance intentions. In turn, the influence of socio-demographic variables is not significant, which suggests that smartcards should focus on a wide-range of users. These results offer interesting implications and recommendations for public managers such as the need to guarantee the security of the transaction system and to expand the number of services and initiatives relaying on the smartcard service in order to gradually develop the smart city transformation.

[1]  Jensen J. Zhao,et al.  Opportunities and threats: A security assessment of state e-government websites , 2010, Gov. Inf. Q..

[2]  Rudolf R. Sinkovics,et al.  The Use of Partial Least Squares Path Modeling in International Marketing , 2009 .

[3]  Mark Deakin,et al.  From intelligent to smart cities , 2011 .

[4]  Insu Park,et al.  Repeated Use of E-Gov Web Sites: A Satisfaction and Confidentiality Perspective , 2006, Int. J. Electron. Gov. Res..

[5]  Nadia Caidi,et al.  How much is too little? Privacy and smart cards in Hong Kong and Ontario , 2005, J. Inf. Sci..

[6]  Alan D. Smith,et al.  Gauging acceptability of governmental intervention in terms of smart card technology , 2005, Electron. Gov. an Int. J..

[7]  Yao-Hua Tan,et al.  Using IT to engender trust in government-to-business relationships: The Authorized Economic Operator (AEO) as an example , 2012, Gov. Inf. Q..

[8]  Tammo H. A. Bijmolt,et al.  Generalizations on Consumer Innovation Adoption: A Meta-Analysis on Drivers of Intention and Behavior , 2011 .

[9]  Paul T. Jaeger,et al.  The impact of polices on government social media usage: Issues, challenges, and recommendations , 2012, Gov. Inf. Q..

[10]  Shuang Xu,et al.  Moderating Effects of Task Type on Wireless Technology Acceptance , 2005, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[11]  Wynne W. Chin,et al.  Structural equation modeling analysis with small samples using partial least squares , 1999 .

[12]  Gregory E. Truman,et al.  An empirical study of smart card technology , 2003, Inf. Manag..

[13]  Paul H. P. Yeow,et al.  User acceptance of Malaysian government multipurpose smartcard applications , 2009, Gov. Inf. Q..

[14]  Paul Jen-Hwa Hu,et al.  Modeling Citizen Satisfaction with Mandatory Adoption of an E-Government Technology , 2011, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[15]  Michel Tenenhaus,et al.  PLS path modeling , 2005, Comput. Stat. Data Anal..

[16]  John R. Rossiter,et al.  The C-OAR-SE procedure for scale development in marketing , 2002 .

[17]  Konstantina S. Nikita,et al.  Smart cards in healthcare information systems: Benefits and limitations , 2013, 13th IEEE International Conference on BioInformatics and BioEngineering.

[18]  Theresa A. Pardo,et al.  Smart cities and service integration initiatives in North American cities: a status report , 2012, dg.o '12.

[19]  Fred D. Davis,et al.  User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models , 1989 .

[20]  Gurvirender Tejay,et al.  Theorizing Information Security Success: Towards Secure E-Government , 2010, Int. J. Electron. Gov. Res..

[21]  Fred D. Davis Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology , 1989, MIS Q..

[22]  Heshan Sun,et al.  The role of moderating factors in user technology acceptance , 2006, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[23]  Chechen Liao,et al.  Examining the impact of privacy, trust and risk perceptions beyond monetary transactions: An integrated model , 2011, Electron. Commer. Res. Appl..

[24]  J. Zaichkowsky Measuring the Involvement Construct , 1985 .

[25]  Mirko Vintar,et al.  E-government and organisational transformation of government: Black box revisited? , 2014, Gov. Inf. Q..

[26]  Ping Gao,et al.  Challenges of egovernment in developing countries: actor-network analysis of Thailand's smart ID card project , 2010, ICTD.

[27]  Tamara Dinev,et al.  Internet privacy concerns and beliefs about government surveillance - An empirical investigation , 2008, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst..

[28]  Carlos Flavián,et al.  The role of security, privacy, usability and reputation in the development of online banking , 2007, Online Inf. Rev..

[29]  S. Geisser A predictive approach to the random effect model , 1974 .

[30]  Paul Jen-Hwa Hu,et al.  Determinants of service quality and continuance intention of online services: The case of eTax , 2009 .

[31]  C. Fornell,et al.  Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. , 1981 .

[32]  John L. Rice,et al.  Building better government IT: understanding community beliefs and attitudes toward smart card technologies , 2010, Behav. Inf. Technol..

[33]  H. Raghav Rao,et al.  A trust-based consumer decision-making model in electronic commerce: The role of trust, perceived risk, and their antecedents , 2008, Decis. Support Syst..

[34]  R. Bunduchi,et al.  Mapping the benefits and costs associated with process innovation: The case of RFID adoption , 2011 .

[35]  Hsin Hsin Chang,et al.  Consumer perception of interface quality, security, and loyalty in electronic commerce , 2009, Inf. Manag..

[36]  Anol Bhattacherjee,et al.  Acceptance of e-commerce services: the case of electronic brokerages , 2000, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Part A.

[37]  Anol Bhattacherjee,et al.  Understanding Information Systems Continuance: An Expectation-Confirmation Model , 2001, MIS Q..

[38]  Jean J. Endo,et al.  The effect of student-faculty interaction on students' educational outcomes , 1981 .

[39]  Muniruddeen Lallmahamood,et al.  An Examination of IndividualâÂÂs Perceived Security andPrivacy of the Internet in Malaysia and the Influence ofThis on Their Intention to Use E-Commerce: Using AnExtension of the Technology Acceptance Model , 2007 .

[40]  J. Fransoo,et al.  Measuring the bullwhip effect in the supply chain , 2000 .

[41]  Yuan Li,et al.  Theories in online information privacy research: A critical review and an integrated framework , 2012, Decis. Support Syst..

[42]  Yi-Shun Wang,et al.  DETERMINANTS OF USER ACCEPTANCE OF INTERNET BANKING: AN EMPIRICAL STUDY , 2003 .

[43]  Thea van der Geest,et al.  Shall I Tell You Where I Live and Who I Am? Factors Influencing the Behavioral Intention to Disclose Personal Data for Online Government Transactions , 2012, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact..

[44]  Wonjae Jang,et al.  Travel Time and Transfer Analysis Using Transit Smart Card Data , 2010 .

[45]  Arnold Depickere,et al.  Comparing smart card adoption in Singapore and Australian universities , 2003, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[46]  Khaldoun Batiha,et al.  Measuring user satisfaction from e-Government services: Lessons from Jordan , 2013, Gov. Inf. Q..

[47]  C. Flavián,et al.  Integrating trust and personal values into the Technology Acceptance Model: The case of e-government services adoption , 2012 .

[48]  Mark Vandenbosch,et al.  Research Report: Richness Versus Parsimony in Modeling Technology Adoption Decisions - Understanding Merchant Adoption of a Smart Card-Based Payment System , 2001, Inf. Syst. Res..

[49]  M. J. Moon,et al.  Linking Citizen Satisfaction with E-Government and Trust in Government , 2004 .

[50]  Paul A. Pavlou,et al.  Understanding and Predicting Electronic Commerce Adoption: An Extension of the Theory of Planned Behavior , 2006, MIS Q..

[51]  Jae Hyoung Lee,et al.  An empirical examination of the acceptance behaviour of hotel front office systems: An extended technology acceptance model , 2008 .

[52]  Anthony D. Miyazaki,et al.  Reducing online privacy risk to facilitate e‐service adoption: the influence of perceived ease of use and corporate credibility , 2010 .

[53]  H. Winklhofer,et al.  Index Construction with Formative Indicators: An Alternative to Scale Development , 2001 .

[54]  David H. Coursey,et al.  Models of E-Government: Are They Correct? An Empirical Assessment , 2008 .