Detecting small changes in populations at landscape scales: a bioacoustic site-occupancy framework

Abstract Occupancy modeling based on detection/non-detection data has become a common approach for monitoring changes in the populations of both sensitive and invasive species, with emerging bioacoustic technology enhancing opportunities for implementing such programs at landscape-scales. Statistical power, however, to detect small but biologically meaningful changes in site occupancy as part of landscape-scale monitoring is typically low, with large – yet hereto unknown – sampling efforts likely required for rigorous inference. Therefore, we (i) assessed sampling levels and detection probabilities needed to detect small changes in site occupancy driven by both intrinsic trends and management effects, and (ii) evaluated the feasibility of using bioacoustics to simultaneously monitor a common but declining species and a rare but increasing invasive competitor within a site occupancy framework. Simulation-based power analyses indicated that detection/non-detection data collected at large numbers of sites (500–1500) can yield high statistical power (>80%) to detect ≥2% annual declines in site occupancy within 10 years, but depended on the number of visits per site, initial occupancy rates, and detection probabilities. Statistical power to detect ≥30% declines in local survival rates in 10 years was also high. Based on ∼6-night passive-acoustic surveys, site occupancy and detection probabilities were 0.43 and 0.50, respectively, for the common but declining species (the spotted owl), and 0.09 and 0.67, respectively, for the rare but increasing competitor (the barred owl). Simulations parameterized with these empirically-derived rates indicated that 2% annual declines in spotted owl site occupancy could be detected with high statistical power in 10 years with 1,000 sites surveyed three times per season (year) or 1500 sites surveyed two times per season. Statistical power to detect 4% annual increases in site occupancy for expanding barred owl populations with this sampling scheme was also high. Thus, our study yielded the novel finding that passive-acoustic monitoring can be used to detect small but potentially biologically meaningful changes in site occupancy for multiple species with very different population dynamics with high confidence. More broadly, as computational improvements bring acoustic-based whole-community identification into the realm of possibility, our approach will allow managers to rapidly assess the statistical power attainable for each species: systematic and statistically robust monitoring of entire faunal communities within a unified framework at a landscape scale may become a reality.

[1]  Graeme Caughley,et al.  Wildlife Ecology and Management , 1994 .

[2]  A. Franklin,et al.  The Invasion of Barred Owls and its Potential Effect on the Spotted Owl: a Conservation Conundrum , 2007, Biological Invasions.

[3]  Alex Rogers,et al.  AudioMoth: Evaluation of a smart open acoustic device for monitoring biodiversity and the environment , 2018 .

[4]  V. Popescu,et al.  Estimating population impacts via dynamic occupancy analysis of Before-After Control-Impact studies. , 2012, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[5]  Paul M. Lukacs,et al.  Camera-based occupancy monitoring at large scales: Power to detect trends in grizzly bears across the Canadian Rockies , 2016 .

[6]  Scott L. Stephens,et al.  Simulating Fire and Forest Dynamics for a Landscape Fuel Treatment Project in the Sierra Nevada , 2011, Forest Science.

[7]  A. Franklin,et al.  Differential impacts of wildfire on the population dynamics of an old-forest species. , 2017, Ecology.

[8]  M. Morrison,et al.  Vocal Individuality of Great Gray Owls in the Sierra Nevada , 2009 .

[9]  Richard B. Chandler,et al.  unmarked: An R Package for Fitting Hierarchical Models of Wildlife Occurrence and Abundance , 2011 .

[10]  Erin M. Bayne,et al.  Autonomous recording units in avian ecological research: current use and future applications , 2017 .

[11]  R. Reiser,et al.  Who hits and hoots at whom? Potential for interference competition between barred and northern spotted owls , 2011 .

[12]  P. Laguna,et al.  Signal Processing , 2002, Yearbook of Medical Informatics.

[13]  Connor M. Wood,et al.  Using metapopulation models to assess species conservation–ecosystem restoration trade-offs , 2018, Biological Conservation.

[14]  D. MacKenzie Occupancy Estimation and Modeling: Inferring Patterns and Dynamics of Species Occurrence , 2005 .

[15]  J. Nichols,et al.  Multiseason occupancy models for correlated replicate surveys , 2014 .

[16]  Libby Rumpff,et al.  Integrated models to support multiobjective ecological restoration decisions , 2017, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[17]  J. Nichols,et al.  ESTIMATING SITE OCCUPANCY, COLONIZATION, AND LOCAL EXTINCTION WHEN A SPECIES IS DETECTED IMPERFECTLY , 2003 .

[18]  D. Whisson,et al.  Passive acoustic surveys for predicting species’ distributions: Optimising detection probability , 2018, PloS one.

[19]  J. Andrew Royle,et al.  A Bayesian state-space formulation of dynamic occupancy models. , 2007, Ecology.

[20]  Tyler A. Helble,et al.  Calibrating passive acoustic monitoring: correcting humpback whale call detections for site-specific and time-dependent environmental characteristics. , 2013, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[21]  J. Keane,et al.  Declining old‐forest species as a legacy of large trees lost , 2018 .

[22]  Barry R. Noon,et al.  SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH AND THE SPOTTED OWL (STRIX OCCIDENTALIS): OPPORTUNITIES FOR MAJOR CONTRIBUTIONS TO AVIAN POPULATION ECOLOGY , 2002 .

[23]  J. B. Ruhl,et al.  Committing to ecological restoration , 2015, Science.

[24]  H. Possingham,et al.  Optimizing Presence–Absence Surveys For Detecting Population Trends , 2006, The Journal of Wildlife Management.

[25]  Cindy E. Hauser,et al.  Streamlining 'search and destroy': cost-effective surveillance for invasive species management. , 2009, Ecology letters.

[26]  James E. Hines,et al.  ESTIMATING TEMPORARY EMIGRATION USING CAPTURE-RECAPTURE DATA WITH POLLOCK'S ROBUST DESIGN , 1997 .

[27]  P. Speldewinde,et al.  Evaluating the efficacy of a landscape scale feral cat control program using camera traps and occupancy models , 2018, Scientific Reports.

[28]  B. Tershy,et al.  A comparison of automated and traditional monitoring techniques for marbled murrelets using passive acoustic sensors , 2015 .

[29]  Erin M. Bayne,et al.  Utility of Automated Species Recognition For Acoustic Monitoring of Owls , 2018, Journal of Raptor Research.

[30]  J. Russell,et al.  Optimizing confirmation of invasive species eradication with rapid eradication assessment , 2017 .

[31]  C. Kerbiriou,et al.  Use of Large‐Scale Acoustic Monitoring to Assess Anthropogenic Pressures on Orthoptera Communities , 2013, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[32]  Simone Hartwig,et al.  INDIVIDUAL ACOUSTIC IDENTIFICATION AS A NON-INVASIVE CONSERVATION TOOL: AN APPROACH TO THE CONSERVATION OF THE AFRICAN WILD DOG LYCAON PICTUS (TEMMINCK, 1820) , 2005 .

[33]  David M Marsh,et al.  Current Trends in Plant and Animal Population Monitoring , 2008, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[34]  R. J. Gutiérrez,et al.  Relation between Occupancy and Abundance for a Territorial Species, the California Spotted Owl , 2013, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[35]  Christopher A. May,et al.  Demography of Two Mexican Spotted Owl Populations , 1999 .

[36]  Christian Dietz,et al.  A continental-scale tool for acoustic identification of European bats , 2012 .

[37]  Kurt M. Fristrup,et al.  Influence factors and spatiotemporal patterns of environmental sound levels in the contiguous United States , 2016 .

[38]  Hjalmar S. Kühl,et al.  Towards the automated detection and occupancy estimation of primates using passive acoustic monitoring , 2015 .

[39]  H. Possingham,et al.  IMPROVING PRECISION AND REDUCING BIAS IN BIOLOGICAL SURVEYS: ESTIMATING FALSE‐NEGATIVE ERROR RATES , 2003 .

[40]  Richard Shine,et al.  Rapid expansion of the cane toad (Bufo marinus) invasion front in tropical Australia , 2007 .

[41]  E. Forsman,et al.  Competitive interactions and resource partitioning between northern spotted owls and barred owls in western Oregon , 2014 .

[42]  Simon Chamaillé-Jammes,et al.  Simultaneous modeling of habitat suitability, occupancy, and relative abundance: African elephants in Zimbabwe. , 2010, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[43]  K. Livezey Range Expansion of Barred Owls, Part I: Chronology and Distribution , 2009 .

[44]  David R. Anderson,et al.  Methods for collecting and analyzing demographic data on the northern spotted owl , 1996 .

[45]  Joseph L. Ganey,et al.  Calling Behavior of Spotted Owls in Northern Arizona , 1990 .

[46]  Jorge A. Ahumada,et al.  Monitoring the Status and Trends of Tropical Forest Terrestrial Vertebrate Communities from Camera Trap Data: A Tool for Conservation , 2013, PloS one.

[47]  J. Keane Threats to the viability of California spotted owls , 2017 .

[48]  S. Beissinger,et al.  Applying the Declining Population Paradigm: Diagnosing Causes of Poor Reproduction in the Marbled Murrelet , 2004 .

[49]  R. J. Gutiérrez Spotted Owl Research: A Quarter Century of Contributions to Education, Ornithology, Ecology, and Wildlife Management , 2008 .

[50]  Wilson J. Wright,et al.  Improving geographically extensive acoustic survey designs for modeling species occurrence with imperfect detection and misidentification , 2018, Ecology and evolution.

[51]  James E. Hines,et al.  Population dynamics of the California Spotted Owl (Strix occidentalis occidentalis): a meta-analysis , 2004 .

[52]  Approximating Variance of Demographic Parameters Using the Delta Method: A Reference for Avian BiologistsAproximación De La Varianza Para Parámetros Demográficos Utilizando El Método Delta: Una Referencia Para Biólogos De AvesShort Communications , 2007 .

[53]  Z. Buřivalová,et al.  Using soundscapes to detect variable degrees of human influence on tropical forests in Papua New Guinea , 2018, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[54]  Raymond L. Czaplewski,et al.  Adaptive Monitoring Design for Ecosystem Management , 1996 .

[55]  R. J. Gutiérrez,et al.  Cryptic wide‐ranging movements lead to upwardly biased occupancy in a territorial species , 2018, Journal of Applied Ecology.

[56]  A. Kemp,et al.  Vocal identification of individual african Wood Owls Strix woodfordii: a technique to monitor long-term adult turnover and residency , 2002 .

[57]  T. Mitchell Aide,et al.  Improving distribution data of threatened species by combining acoustic monitoring and occupancy modelling , 2016 .

[58]  D K Mellinger,et al.  Recognizing transient low-frequency whale sounds by spectrogram correlation. , 2000, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[59]  Darryl I. MacKenzie,et al.  Designing occupancy studies: general advice and allocating survey effort , 2005 .

[60]  Karan J. Odom,et al.  Distinctiveness in the Territorial Calls of Great Horned Owls within and among Years , 2013 .

[61]  Jonathan D. G. Jones,et al.  Assemblage Time Series Reveal Biodiversity Change but Not Systematic Loss , 2018 .

[62]  C. Ramirez,et al.  Meta-analysis of California Spotted Owl (Strix occidentalis occidentalis) territory occupancy in the Sierra Nevada: Habitat associations and their implications for forest management , 2016, The Condor.

[63]  James D. Nichols,et al.  A new framework for analysing automated acoustic species detection data: Occupancy estimation and optimization of recordings post‐processing , 2017 .

[64]  Mark J. Whittingham,et al.  The Use of Automated Bioacoustic Recorders to Replace Human Wildlife Surveys: An Example Using Nightjars , 2014, PloS one.

[65]  J. Andrew Royle,et al.  Hierarchical Modeling and Inference in Ecology: The Analysis of Data from Populations, Metapopulations and Communities , 2008 .

[66]  R Core Team,et al.  R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .

[67]  J. Andrew Royle,et al.  ESTIMATING SITE OCCUPANCY RATES WHEN DETECTION PROBABILITIES ARE LESS THAN ONE , 2002, Ecology.