Digital implant planning for a minimally invasive surgery approach: a case letter of a full-arch rehabilitation.

P rosthetically directed implant placement using computer software ensures precise fixture placement and predictable prosthetic outcomes. Computer-guided implant dentistry allows the clinician to position specific implants into presurgically determined sites, taking into account both the jawbone anatomy and the planned prosthesis within the computerized tomography (CT) images. In addition, to obtain the optimal final tooth position, the appliance should be scanned. The use of an appliance scan is essential to digitally plan the treatment and to design and then fabricate a surgical template. The planned prosthesis is integrated with anatomical data using singleor dual-scan protocols. In the single-scan appliance, a radiopaque template allows the teeth to be identified as well as the soft tissue in the CT study. However, scatter from neighboring restorations can obscure the view of teeth in the scan appliance. Also, the use of radiopaque templates reduces the image quality of the jaw bone. In the dual-scan protocol, the patient is scanned with the scan appliance and then the scan appliance is scanned alone with different exposure parameters. The planning software converts the CT scan files and merges the 2 scans by matching radiopaque markers, so that the prosthesis will be visible over the available osseous anatomy, avoiding the image’s noise. In totally edentulous patients, it is possible to use the existing denture as a scan appliance. If the prosthesis is not well fitting and the teeth are not in the correct positions, a new appliance should be fabricated. The potential for patient satisfaction is increased if the patient’s acceptance of the prosthesis is obtained before CT scans are done. The transfer of the virtual planning by means of a surgical drilling guide provides significant benefits in the simultaneous placement of multiple implants, especially in large edentulous areas. Computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) technology allows safe flapless surgery to be performed via mucosa-supported guides. The opportunity for an immediately loaded prosthesis can be facilitated by such protocols. In this case letter, a detailed clinical treatment protocol using CAD/CAM computer-guided technology for a maxillary full-arch rehabilitation is presented.

[1]  E M Amet,et al.  IMPLANT TREATMENT PLANNING USING A PATIENT ACCEPTANCE PROSTHESIS, RADIOGRAPHIC RECORD BASE, AND SURGICAL TEMPLATE. PART 1: PRESURGICAL PHASE , 1997, Implant dentistry.

[2]  N. Van Assche,et al.  Accuracy assessment of computer-assisted flapless implant placement in partial edentulism. , 2010, Journal of clinical periodontology.

[3]  Anthony G Sclar,et al.  Guidelines for flapless surgery. , 2007, Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery : official journal of the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons.

[4]  Alan L Rosenfeld,et al.  Prosthetically directed implant placement using computer software to ensure precise placement and predictable prosthetic outcomes. Part 1: diagnostics, imaging, and collaborative accountability. , 2006, The International journal of periodontics & restorative dentistry.

[5]  C. Misch,et al.  Workshop guidelines on immediate loading in implant dentistry. November 7, 2003. , 2004, The Journal of oral implantology.

[6]  Jef M. van der Zel Implant planning and placement using optical scanning and cone beam CT technology. , 2008 .

[7]  A Mehl,et al.  Digital 3-D implant planning: Cerec meets Galileos. , 2010, International journal of computerized dentistry.

[8]  Abbas Azari,et al.  Flapless implant surgery: review of the literature and report of 2 cases with computer-guided surgical approach. , 2008, Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery : official journal of the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons.

[9]  Roberto Rossi,et al.  Planning implants in the esthetic zone using a new implant 3D navigation system. , 2010, The European journal of esthetic dentistry : official journal of the European Academy of Esthetic Dentistry.

[10]  Anne Marie Kuijpers-Jagtman,et al.  Digital three-dimensional image fusion processes for planning and evaluating orthodontics and orthognathic surgery. A systematic review. , 2011, International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery.

[11]  R Jacobs,et al.  The use of CT scan based planning for oral rehabilitation by means of implants and its transfer to the surgical field: a critical review on accuracy. , 2008, Journal of oral rehabilitation.

[12]  A. Alavi,et al.  The Clinical Role of Fusion Imaging Using PET, CT, and MR Imaging. , 2008, PET clinics.

[13]  Orazio Schillaci,et al.  Fusion imaging in nuclear medicine--applications of dual-modality systems in oncology. , 2004, Cancer biotherapy & radiopharmaceuticals.

[14]  Alan L Rosenfeld,et al.  Prosthetically directed implant placement using computer software to ensure precise placement and predictable prosthetic outcomes. Part 3: stereolithographic drilling guides that do not require bone exposure and the immediate delivery of teeth. , 2006, The International journal of periodontics & restorative dentistry.

[15]  Tayfun Özdemir,et al.  Evaluation of 316 narrow diameter implants followed for 5-10 years: a clinical and radiographic retrospective study. , 2010 .

[16]  Hom-lay Wang,et al.  Consensus Conference on Immediate Loading: The Single Tooth and Partial Edentulous Areas , 2006, Implant dentistry.

[17]  Guy Marchal,et al.  An image-guided planning system for endosseous oral implants , 1998, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[18]  J. Radford,et al.  Implant planning and placement using optical scanning and cone beam CT technology , 2009, BDJ.

[19]  Reinhilde Jacobs,et al.  Imaging technique selection for the preoperative planning of oral implants: a review of the literature. , 2002, Clinical implant dentistry and related research.

[20]  J Neugebauer,et al.  CAD/CAM-produced surgical guides: Optimizing the treatment workflow. , 2011, International journal of computerized dentistry.

[21]  Alan L Rosenfeld,et al.  Prosthetically directed implant placement using computer software to ensure precise placement and predictable prosthetic outcomes. Part 2: rapid-prototype medical modeling and stereolithographic drilling guides requiring bone exposure. , 2006, The International journal of periodontics & restorative dentistry.

[22]  Eduardo Passos Rocha,et al.  Computer-Guided Surgery in Implantology: Review of Basic Concepts , 2010, The Journal of craniofacial surgery.

[23]  P. Tardieu,et al.  Computer-assisted implant placement: scan template, simplant, surgiguide, and SAFE system. , 2007, The International journal of periodontics & restorative dentistry.

[24]  Volkan Arısan,et al.  Implant surgery using bone- and mucosa-supported stereolithographic guides in totally edentulous jaws: surgical and post-operative outcomes of computer-aided vs. standard techniques. , 2010, Clinical oral implants research.

[25]  Konstantinos X Michalakis,et al.  Immediately loaded maxillary and mandibular dental implants with fixed CAD/CAM prostheses using a flapless surgical approach: a clinical report. , 2011, Journal of prosthodontics : official journal of the American College of Prosthodontists.

[26]  G. Mandelaris,et al.  Computer-guided implant dentistry for precise implant placement: combining specialized stereolithographically generated drilling guides and surgical implant instrumentation. , 2010, The International journal of periodontics & restorative dentistry.