Processing of strong-motion accelerograms: needs, options and consequences

Recordings from strong-motion accelerographs are of fundamental importance in earthquake engineering, forming the basis for all characterizations of ground shaking employed for seismic design. The recordings, particularly those from analog instruments, invariably contain noise that can mask and distort the ground-motion signal at both high and low frequencies. For any application of recorded accelerograms in engineering seismology or earthquake engineering, it is important to identify the presence of this noise in the digitized time-history and its influence on the parameters that are to be derived from the records. If the parameters of interest are affected by noise then appropriate processing needs to be applied to the records, although it must be accepted from the outset that it is generally not possible to recover the actual ground motion over a wide range of frequencies. There are many schemes available for processing strong-motion data and it is important to be aware of the merits and pitfalls associated with each option. Equally important is to appreciate the effects of the procedures on the records in order to avoid errors in the interpretation and use of the results. Options for processing strong-motion accelerograms are presented, discussed and evaluated from the perspective of engineering application.

[1]  R. Haddon,et al.  Earthquake source spectra in eastern North America , 1996, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America.

[2]  W. B. Joyner,et al.  Measurement, Characterization, and Prediction of Strong Ground Motion , 1988 .

[3]  I. Spectra.  Consortium of Organizations for Strong-Motion Observation Systems , 2005 .

[4]  D. Boore,et al.  Effect of causal and acausal filters on elastic and inelastic response spectra , 2003 .

[5]  I. Kalogeras,et al.  GROUND MOTION ATTENUATION RELATIONS FOR SHALLOW EARTHQUAKES IN GREECE , 2002 .

[6]  D. Boore.  Effect of Baseline Corrections on Displacements and Response Spectra for Several Recordings of the 1999 Chi-Chi, Taiwan, Earthquake , 2004 .

[7]  David M. Boore.  Analog-to-Digital Conversion as a Source of Drifts in Displacements Derived from Digital Recordings of Ground Acceleration , 2003 .

[8]  F. Cotton,et al.  NEW EMPIRICAL RESPONSE SPECTRAL ATTENUATION LAWS FOR MODERATE EUROPEAN EARTHQUAKES , 2003 .

[9]  David M. Boore,et al.  On Pads and Filters: Processing Strong-Motion Data , 2005 .

[10]  David M. Boore,et al.  SEA99: A Revised Ground-Motion Prediction Relation for Use in Extensional Tectonic Regimes , 2005 .

[11]  A. G. Brady,et al.  ANALYSIS OF ERRORS IN DIGITIZED STRONG-MOTION ACCELEROGRAMS , 1973 .

[12]  Lupei Zhu,et al.  Recovering permanent displacements from seismic records of the June 9, 1994 Bolivia deep earthquake , 2003 .

[13]  A. G. Brady,et al.  BAP basic strong-motion accelerogram processing software version 1.0 , 1992 .

[14]  George Mylonakis,et al.  Response spectrum of incompatible acceleration, velocity and displacement histories by Praveen K. Malhotra, Earthquake Engng Struct. Dyn. 2001; 30(2):279–286 , 2002 .

[15]  Chia-Yen Peng,et al.  Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America , 2005 .

[16]  Douglas G. Honegger,et al.  Trans-Alaska Pipeline System Performance in the 2002 Denali Fault, Alaska, Earthquake , 2004 .

[17]  B. N. Margaris,et al.  Determination of noise spectra from strong motion data recorded in Greece , 2003 .

[18]  Praveen K. Malhotra,et al.  Response spectrum of incompatible acceleration, velocity and displacement histories , 2001 .

[19]  Mihailo D. Trifunac,et al.  A note on the useable dynamic range of accelerographs recording translation 1 We dedicate this paper , 2001 .

[20]  N. Abrahamson,et al.  Empirical Response Spectral Attenuation Relations for Shallow Crustal Earthquakes , 1997 .

[21]  Mihailo D. Trifunac,et al.  Common problems in automatic digitization of strong motion accelerograms , 1999 .

[22]  N. Abrahamson,et al.  Modification of Empirical Strong Ground Motion Attenuation Relations to Include the Amplitude and Duration Effects of Rupture Directivity , 1997 .

[23]  D. Boore.  Ground Motion in Anchorage, Alaska, from the 2002 Denali Fault Earthquake: Site Response and Displacement Pulses , 2004 .

[24]  Gian Michele Calvi,et al.  STRATEGIES FOR REPAIR AND SEISMIC UPGRADING OF BOLU VIADUCT 1, TURKEY , 2002 .

[25]  John Clinton,et al.  Modern Digital Seismology: Instrumentation, and Small Amplitude Studies in the Engineering World , 2004 .

[26]  D. Hudson.  Reading and interpreting strong motion accelerograms , 1979 .

[27]  Chen Ji,et al.  Slip history of the 2003 San Simeon earthquake constrained by combining 1‐Hz GPS, strong motion, and teleseismic data , 2004 .

[28]  Jerome J. Connor,et al.  A new procedure for processing strong-motion earthquake signals , 1982 .

[29]  A. A. Gusev,et al.  Descriptive statistical model of earthquake source radiation and its application to an estimation of short‐period strong motion , 1983 .

[30]  Thomas C. Hanks,et al.  Strong ground motion of the San Fernando, California, earthquake: Ground displacements , 1975, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America.

[31]  G. Atkinson,et al.  Ground-motion relations for eastern North America , 1995, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America.

[32]  David M. Boore,et al.  Some Observations on Colocated and Closely Spaced Strong Ground- Motion Records of the 1999 Chi-Chi, Taiwan, Earthquake , 2003 .

[33]  David M. Boore,et al.  Comments on Baseline Correction of Digital Strong-Motion Data: Examples from the 1999 Hector Mine, California, Earthquake , 2002 .

[34]  J. Bommer,et al.  DISPLACEMENT SPECTRA FOR SEISMIC DESIGN , 1999 .

[35]  G. E. Fischer.  Ground Motion , 1990 .

[36]  Mihailo D. Trifunac,et al.  Evolution of accelerographs, data processing, strong motion arrays and amplitude and spatial resolution in recording strong earthquake motion ☆ , 2001 .

[37]  David M. Boore,et al.  Short-period P- and S-wave radiation from large earthquakes: Implications for spectral scaling relations , 1986 .

[38]  J. Brune.  Tectonic stress and the spectra of seismic shear waves from earthquakes , 1970 .

[39]  S. W. Park,et al.  Simulation of the seismic performance of the Bolu Viaduct subjected to near‐fault ground motions , 2004 .

[40]  William T. Holmes,et al.  The 1997 NEHRP Recommended Provisions for Seismic Regulations for New Buildings and Other Structures , 2000 .

[41]  Mihailo D. Trifunac,et al.  Zero baseline correction of strong-motion accelerograms , 1971, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America.

[42]  Utpal Dutta,et al.  Determination of Site Response in Anchorage, Alaska, on the Basis of Spectral Ratio Methods , 2002 .

[43]  Mihailo D. Trifunac,et al.  A note on correction of strong-motion accelerograms for instrument response , 1972, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America.

[44]  John Douglas,et al.  What is a Poor Quality Strong-Motion Record? , 2003 .