Landscape-Scale Aboveground Biomass Estimation in Buffer Zone Community Forests of Central Nepal: Coupling In Situ Measurements with Landsat 8 Satellite Data

Knowledge of forest productivity status is an important indicator of the amount of biomass accumulated and the role of terrestrial ecosystems in the carbon cycle. However, accurate and up-to-date information on forest biomass and forest succession remain rudimentary within natural forests. This study sought to understand and establish the potential of a new-generation sensor in estimating aboveground biomass (AGB) stored in the natural forest, also known as ‘community forest’ or buffer zone community forest (BZCF), in the Parsa National Park, Nepal. The utility of the 30-m resolution Landsat 8 Operational Land Imager (OLI) and in situ data was tested using two statistical approaches, namely multiple linear regression (MLR) and random forest (RF). The analysis was done based on four computational procedures. These included spectral bands, vegetation indices and pooled dataset (spectral bands + vegetation indices), and model selected important variables. AGB estimation based on pooled data showed that the RF algorithm produced better results when compared to the use of the MLR model. For instance, the RF model estimated AGB with an R2 value of 0.87 and a root mean square error of 20.50 t ha−1, as well as an R2 value of 0.95 and a RMSE of 13.3 t ha−1 when using selected important variables. Comparatively, the MLR using pooled data produced an R2 value of 0.56 and RMSE value of 37.01 t ha−1. The RF model selected Optimized Soil Adjusted Vegetation index (OSAVI), Simple ratio (SR), Modified simple ratio (MSR), and Normalized difference Vegetation index (NDVI) as the most important variables for estimating AGB, whereas MLR selected band 5 and SR. These findings demonstrate the relevance of the relatively new Landsat 8 sensor in the estimation of AGB in community buffer zones.

[1]  José Augusto Baranauskas,et al.  How Many Trees in a Random Forest? , 2012, MLDM.

[2]  Onisimo Mutanga,et al.  A comparison of regression tree ensembles: Predicting Sirex noctilio induced water stress in Pinus patula forests of KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa , 2010, Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinformation.

[3]  Heather Reese,et al.  Mapping Tree Canopy Cover and Aboveground Biomass in Sudano-Sahelian Woodlands Using Landsat 8 and Random Forest , 2015, Remote. Sens..

[4]  Moses Azong Cho,et al.  Toward structural assessment of semi-arid African savannahs and woodlands: The potential of multitemporal polarimetric RADARSAT-2 fine beam images , 2013 .

[5]  B. Rock,et al.  Detection of changes in leaf water content using Near- and Middle-Infrared reflectances , 1989 .

[6]  Onisimo Mutanga,et al.  Intra-and-Inter Species Biomass Prediction in a Plantation Forest: Testing the Utility of High Spatial Resolution Spaceborne Multispectral RapidEye Sensor and Advanced Machine Learning Algorithms , 2014, Sensors.

[7]  O. Mutanga,et al.  Predicting Eucalyptus spp. stand volume in Zululand, South Africa: an analysis using a stochastic gradient boosting regression ensemble with multi-source data sets , 2015 .

[8]  Akin Ozçift,et al.  Random forests ensemble classifier trained with data resampling strategy to improve cardiac arrhythmia diagnosis. , 2011, Computers in biology and medicine.

[9]  J. Chambers,et al.  Tree allometry and improved estimation of carbon stocks and balance in tropical forests , 2005, Oecologia.

[10]  Barbara Koch,et al.  An efficient regression strategy for extracting forest biomass information from satellite sensor data , 2005 .

[11]  Max Kuhn,et al.  Building Predictive Models in R Using the caret Package , 2008 .

[12]  J. Zhang,et al.  Exploring multi-scale forest above ground biomass estimation with optical remote sensing imageries , 2017 .

[13]  Onisimo Mutanga,et al.  Remote Sensing of Above-Ground Biomass , 2017, Remote. Sens..

[14]  O. Mutanga,et al.  Evaluating the utility of the medium-spatial resolution Landsat 8 multispectral sensor in quantifying aboveground biomass in uMgeni catchment, South Africa , 2015 .

[15]  Sarnam Singh,et al.  Spatial Distribution of Forest Biomass Using Remote Sensing and Regression Models in Northern Haryana, India , 2011 .

[16]  O. Mutanga,et al.  Investigating the robustness of the new Landsat-8 Operational Land Imager derived texture metrics in estimating plantation forest aboveground biomass in resource constrained areas , 2015 .

[17]  Jin Chen,et al.  Estimating aboveground biomass of grassland having a high canopy cover: an exploratory analysis of in situ hyperspectral data , 2009 .

[18]  D. Lu The potential and challenge of remote sensing‐based biomass estimation , 2006 .

[19]  Guangxing Wang,et al.  Examining Spectral Reflectance Saturation in Landsat Imagery and Corresponding Solutions to Improve Forest Aboveground Biomass Estimation , 2016, Remote. Sens..

[20]  Jindi Wang,et al.  Comparison and Evaluation of Three Methods for Estimating Forest above Ground Biomass Using TM and GLAS Data , 2017, Remote. Sens..

[21]  Julia A. Barsi,et al.  The next Landsat satellite: The Landsat Data Continuity Mission , 2012 .

[22]  Giles M. Foody,et al.  Mapping the biomass of Bornean tropical rain forest from remotely sensed data , 2001 .

[23]  R Core Team,et al.  R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .

[24]  Paola Zuccolotto,et al.  Variable Selection Using Random Forests , 2006 .

[25]  Julian J. Faraway,et al.  Practical Regression and Anova using R , 2002 .

[26]  U. Grömping Dependence of Variable Importance in Random Forests on the Shape of the Regressor Space , 2009 .

[27]  M. Hardisky The Influence of Soil Salinity, Growth Form, and Leaf Moisture on-the Spectral Radiance of Spartina alterniflora Canopies , 2008 .

[28]  D. Roberts,et al.  Estimation of tropical rain forest aboveground biomass with small-footprint lidar and hyperspectral sensors , 2011 .

[29]  T. Dawson,et al.  Synthesis of remote sensing approaches for forest carbon estimation: reporting to the Kyoto Protocol , 2005 .

[30]  O. Mutanga,et al.  Discriminating the papyrus vegetation (Cyperus papyrus L.) and its co-existent species using random forest and hyperspectral data resampled to HYMAP , 2012 .

[31]  C. Jordan Derivation of leaf-area index from quality of light on the forest floor , 1969 .

[32]  Robert C. Glen,et al.  Random Forest Models To Predict Aqueous Solubility , 2007, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[33]  Eero Muinonen,et al.  Utilizing a Multi-Source Forest Inventory Technique, MODIS Data and Landsat TM Images in the Production of Forest Cover and Volume Maps for the Terai Physiographic Zone in Nepal , 2012, Remote. Sens..

[34]  A. Huete A soil-adjusted vegetation index (SAVI) , 1988 .

[35]  Max Kuhn,et al.  Applied Predictive Modeling , 2013 .

[36]  O. Mutanga,et al.  Estimating standing biomass in papyrus (Cyperus papyrus L.) swamp: exploratory of in situ hyperspectral indices and random forest regression , 2014 .

[37]  A. Prasad,et al.  Newer Classification and Regression Tree Techniques: Bagging and Random Forests for Ecological Prediction , 2006, Ecosystems.

[38]  Jean-Philippe Vert,et al.  Consistency of Random Forests , 2014, 1405.2881.

[39]  Dengsheng Lu,et al.  Relationships between forest stand parameters and Landsat TM spectral responses in the Brazilian Amazon Basin , 2004 .

[40]  A. Elhan,et al.  Investigation of Four Different Normality Tests in Terms of Type 1 Error Rate and Power under Different Distributions , 2006 .

[41]  H. El-Askary,et al.  Change detection of coral reef habitat using Landsat-5 TM, Landsat 7 ETM+ and Landsat 8 OLI data in the Red Sea (Hurghada, Egypt) , 2014 .

[42]  Timo Tokola,et al.  Effect of field plot location on estimating tropical forest above-ground biomass in Nepal using airborne laser scanning data , 2014 .

[43]  Andy Liaw,et al.  Classification and Regression by randomForest , 2007 .

[44]  B. Pinty,et al.  GEMI: a non-linear index to monitor global vegetation from satellites , 1992, Vegetatio.

[45]  Philipp Probst,et al.  To tune or not to tune the number of trees in random forest? , 2017, J. Mach. Learn. Res..

[46]  T. Treue,et al.  Beyond buffer zone protection: a comparative study of park and buffer zone products' importance to villagers living inside Royal Chitwan National Park and to villagers living in its buffer zone. , 2006, Journal of environmental management.

[47]  Georgia Papacharalampous,et al.  Variable Selection in Time Series Forecasting Using Random Forests , 2017, Algorithms.

[48]  O. Mutanga,et al.  Application of topo-edaphic factors and remotely sensed vegetation indices to enhance biomass estimation in a heterogeneous landscape in the Eastern Arc Mountains of Tanzania , 2016 .

[49]  John R. Schott,et al.  Leveraging EO-1 to Evaluate Capability of New Generation of Landsat Sensors for Coastal/Inland Water Studies , 2013, IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing.

[50]  D. Lu Aboveground biomass estimation using Landsat TM data in the Brazilian Amazon , 2005 .

[51]  Onisimo Mutanga,et al.  Examining the utility of random forest and AISA Eagle hyperspectral image data to predict Pinus patula age in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa , 2011 .

[52]  Florian Hartig,et al.  Importance of sample size, data type and prediction method for remote sensing-based estimations of aboveground forest biomass , 2014 .

[53]  J. Chen Evaluation of Vegetation Indices and a Modified Simple Ratio for Boreal Applications , 1996 .

[54]  Thomas R. Crow,et al.  Estimating aboveground biomass using Landsat 7 ETM+ data across a managed landscape in northern Wisconsin, USA , 2004 .

[55]  J. Roujean,et al.  Estimating PAR absorbed by vegetation from bidirectional reflectance measurements , 1995 .

[56]  Antanas Verikas,et al.  Mining data with random forests: A survey and results of new tests , 2011, Pattern Recognit..

[57]  Marc Simard,et al.  Mapping boreal forest biomass from a SRTM and TanDEM-X based on canopy height model and Landsat spectral indices , 2018, International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation.

[58]  Leo Breiman,et al.  Random Forests , 2001, Machine Learning.

[59]  M. Steininger Satellite estimation of tropical secondary forest above-ground biomass: Data from Brazil and Bolivia , 2000 .

[60]  B. Koch,et al.  Non-parametric prediction and mapping of standing timber volume and biomass in a temperate forest: application of multiple optical/LiDAR-derived predictors , 2010 .

[61]  A. Skidmore,et al.  Narrow band vegetation indices overcome the saturation problem in biomass estimation , 2004 .

[62]  Onisimo Mutanga,et al.  High density biomass estimation for wetland vegetation using WorldView-2 imagery and random forest regression algorithm , 2012, Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinformation.

[63]  Erwan Scornet,et al.  A random forest guided tour , 2015, TEST.

[64]  Xu Aigong,et al.  Integration of WorldView-2 and airborne LiDAR data for tree species level carbon stock mapping in Kayar Khola watershed, Nepal , 2015, Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinformation.

[65]  Jim Lewsey,et al.  Medical Statistics: A Guide to Data Analysis and Critical Appraisal , 2015 .

[66]  A. Huete,et al.  A Modified Soil Adjusted Vegetation Index , 1994 .

[67]  Zhenfeng Shao,et al.  Estimating Forest Aboveground Biomass by Combining Optical and SAR Data: A Case Study in Genhe, Inner Mongolia, China , 2016, Sensors.

[68]  S. Baral,et al.  MAPPING CARBON STOCK USING HIGH RESOLUTION SATELLITE IMAGES IN SUB- TROPICAL FOREST OF NEPAL , 2011 .