Validation of an Objective Method for the Qualitative and Quantitative Assessment of Binocular Accommodative Facility

ABSTRACT Purpose: Assessing binocular accommodative facility (BAF) enables the evaluation of the interaction between the accommodative and vergence systems, which is relevant for the diagnosis of accommodative and binocular disorders. However, the tests used to assess BAF present methodological caveats (e.g., lack of objective control, vergence demands, and image size alterations), limiting its external validity. This study aimed to (i) develop a new objective method to quantitatively and qualitatively evaluate the BAF in free-viewing conditions, and explore its validity by the comparison with the Hart Chart test, and (ii) assess the inter-session reliability of the proposed method. Methods: 33 healthy young adults took part in this study. We used a binocular open-field autorefractor to continuously assess the magnitude of accommodative response during a 60-sec period, while participants repeatedly changed fixation from a far to a near chart when clarity of vision was achieved at each level. Accommodative response data were used to characterize the BAF measurement in quantitative (number of cycles) and qualitative terms (percentage of times that correctly accommodating or dis-accommodating in each level of accommodation as well as the magnitude of the accommodative change). Results: Our data revealed that the new proposed method accurately counted the number of cycles per minute when compared with the Hart Chart test (p = .23, ES = 0.02; mean difference = 0.18 ± 0.85). The inter-session reliability of the proposed method was demonstrated to be excellent (Pearson r and intraclass correlation coefficient: 0.95 to 0.98) for the parameters obtained with the BAF test. Conclusions: The present outcomes evidence that the proposed objective method allows to accurately assess the frequency and precision of BAF by the combination of the classical Hart Chart test and a binocular open-field autorefractometer. Our findings may be of relevance for the diagnosis and treatment of accommodative and binocular disorders.

[1]  L. L. Stasi,et al.  Driving time modulates accommodative response and intraocular pressure , 2016, Physiology & Behavior.

[2]  Leon N. McLin,et al.  Changing size (looming) as a stimulus to accommodation and vergence , 1988, Vision Research.

[3]  K. Saunders,et al.  The repeatability and validity of dynamic retinoscopy in assessing the accommodative response , 2003, Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians.

[4]  José A. García,et al.  Evolution of accommodative function and development of ocular movements in children. , 2003, Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians.

[5]  Changes in dynamics of accommodation after accommodative facility training in myopes and emmetropes , 2010, Vision Research.

[6]  F Lara,et al.  General binocular disorders: prevalence in a clinic population , 2001, Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians.

[7]  Torbjörn Falkmer,et al.  The Case for Using the Repeatability Coefficient When Calculating Test–Retest Reliability , 2013, PloS one.

[8]  M. Rouse,et al.  A review of the literature and a normative study of accommodative facility. , 1984, Journal of the American Optometric Association.

[10]  M. Scheiman,et al.  Assessment of accommodative facility using MEM retinoscopy. , 1990, Journal of the American Optometric Association.

[11]  P. Mitchell,et al.  Accommodative facility in eyes with and without myopia. , 2006, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[12]  Rent M. Daum,et al.  CLINICAL MANAGEMENT OF BINOCULAR VISION: HETEROPHORIC, ACCOMMODATIVE AND EYE MOVEMENT DISORDERS , 1994 .

[13]  N Flax,et al.  Clinical assessment of accommodative facility in symptomatic and asymptomatic individuals. , 1985, Journal of the American Optometric Association.

[14]  J M Bland,et al.  Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement , 1986 .

[15]  B Antona,et al.  Intra‐examiner repeatability and agreement in accommodative response measurements , 2009, Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians.

[16]  A. Johnston,et al.  The Importance of the Test Parameters in the Clinical Assessment of Accommodative Facility , 1990, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[17]  B. Wick,et al.  Clinical testing of accommodative facility: part III. Masked assessment of the relation between visual symptoms and binocular test results in school children and adults. , 2002, Optometry.

[18]  Philippa Pattison,et al.  Measuring Visual Discomfort , 1999 .

[19]  Mitchell Scheiman,et al.  Validity and reliability of the revised convergence insufficiency symptom survey in adults , 2004, Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians.

[20]  Lluïsa Quevedo,et al.  Experimental study of visual training effects in shooting initiation , 1999, Clinical & experimental optometry.

[21]  P. Allen,et al.  Accommodation functions: Co-dependency and relationship to refractive error , 2006, Vision Research.

[22]  W. Charman,et al.  Dynamics of accommodative facility in myopes. , 2007, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[23]  Differences between naïve and expert observers’ vergence and accommodative responses to a range of targets , 2010, Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians.

[24]  S. Wu,et al.  Adler's Physiology of the Eye , 2002 .

[25]  E. Hoddes,et al.  The history and use of the Stanford sleepiness scale , 1971 .

[26]  J. Wolffsohn,et al.  Ocular motor triad with single vision contact lenses compared to spectacle lenses. , 2006, Contact lens & anterior eye : the journal of the British Contact Lens Association.

[27]  Catherine Johnson.  Clinical Management of Binocular Vision: Heterophoric, Accommodative, and Eye Movement Disorders (3rd ed.) , 2009 .

[28]  Leon N Davies,et al.  Clinical evaluation of the Grand Seiko Auto Ref/Keratometer WAM‐5500 , 2010, Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians.

[29]  D. O'leary,et al.  Facility of accommodation in myopia , 2001, Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians.

[30]  Meritxell Vilaseca,et al.  Comparing Autorefractors for Measurement of Accommodation , 2015, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[31]  Peter J. Bex,et al.  Vergence driven accommodation with simulated disparity in myopia and emmetropia , 2018, Experimental eye research.

[32]  Nicola Szostek,et al.  Validation of Novel Metrics from the Accommodative Dynamic Profile , 2018, Vision.

[33]  Adrian Glasser,et al.  Static and Dynamic Accommodation Measured Using the WAM-5500 Autorefractor , 2010, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[34]  C. McAlinden,et al.  Comparing accommodative function between the dominant and non-dominant eye , 2014, Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology.

[35]  M. Scheiman,et al.  Normative Study of Accommodative Facility in Elementary Schoolchildren , 1988, American journal of optometry and physiological optics.

[36]  D. Altman,et al.  STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT , 1986, The Lancet.

[37]  Colm McAlinden,et al.  Statistical methods for conducting agreement (comparison of clinical tests) and precision (repeatability or reproducibility) studies in optometry and ophthalmology , 2011, Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians.

[38]  Bin Wang,et al.  Depth-of-focus of the human eye in the near retinal periphery , 2003, Vision Research.

[39]  M. Zupan,et al.  Visual adaptations to sports vision enhancement training , 2006 .

[40]  K. Ciuffreda,et al.  Accommodative Training to Reduce Nearwork-Induced Transient Myopia , 2009, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[41]  Chris Chase,et al.  Accommodation response and visual discomfort , 2009, Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians.

[42]  P. Kiely,et al.  Is there an association between functional vision and learning to read? , 2001, Clinical & experimental optometry.

[43]  Jorge J. Moré,et al.  The Levenberg-Marquardt algo-rithm: Implementation and theory , 1977 .

[44]  D A Goss,et al.  The relation between accommodative facility and general binocular dysfunction , 2001, Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians.

[45]  Thomas V. Petros,et al.  Accommodative response and cortical activity during sustained attention , 2012, Vision Research.

[46]  S. Marshall,et al.  Progressive statistics for studies in sports medicine and exercise science. , 2009, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[47]  M. Millodot.  The effect of refractive error on the accommodative response gradient: a summary and update , 2015, Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians.