Mobile Bully-victim Behaviour on Facebook: The case of South African Students

Excessive usage of mobile phones in schools has elevated the delinquency of bullying in school grounds and challenged how school policies are executed when it comes to mobile bullying. While bullying on social networks is a growing problem in South African public high schools today, our understanding of mobile bullying on social networks is still limited in the South African context. There has also been limited focus on one type of bullying called, bully-victims. These are adolescents that swing between being a bully and a victim and are difficult to identify. The present study examined the nature of mobile bully-victims and factors influencing mobile bully- victim behaviour on Facebook in South African public secondary schools. The factors influencing mobile bully-victim behaviour examined were Anonymity, Collective behaviour, Power, Facebook usage, Emojis and Facebook features. A total number of 457 school learners from Gauteng and Western Cape provinces completed the questionnaire and of these 319 were bully-victims. Findings reveal that female adolescents are prone to be mobile bully-victims than male adolescents and anonymity appears to be the most influencing factor of Mobile bully-victim behaviour. The more prevalent the mobile bully-victim behaviour, the more likely bully-victims would use Facebook features, the "angry" and "Love" Emojis. The "Ha-ha", "Wow" and "Sad Emojis" are less used to bully others, while the "Love" and "Anger" emojis are mostly used to share and express compassion following victimisation. This confirms earlier claims that Bully-Victims swing between the behaviours or characteristics of a bully and victim. This research also confirms earlier theories and the implications of the findings are discussed.

[1]  Baruch B. Schwarz,et al.  The digital footprints of adolescent depression, social rejection and victimization of bullying on Facebook , 2019, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[2]  R. Harn The Visual Language of Emojis: A Study on College Students’ Social Support Communication in Online Social Networks , 2017 .

[3]  T. Malti,et al.  Psychological processes in young bullies versus bully‐victims , 2017, Aggressive behavior.

[4]  Ndyave Zizipho Caroline,et al.  Factors That Influence Mobile Bully-Victim Behaviour on Social Media: The Case of Facebook , 2017 .

[5]  G. Oosterwyk,et al.  The Nature Of Mobile Bullying & Victimisation In The Western Cape High Schools of South Africa , 2016 .

[6]  V. Reddy,et al.  Safe and sound?: violence and South African education , 2016 .

[7]  L. Hanish,et al.  A relational framework for understanding bullying: Developmental antecedents and outcomes. , 2015, The American psychologist.

[8]  L. M. Oyewusi,et al.  “Cyberbullying”: A Disruptive Behaviour in Modern Day Secondary School Classrooms , 2014 .

[9]  Virginia Wilson,et al.  Research Methods: Sampling , 2014 .

[10]  P. Rodkin Bullying and Children's Peer Relationships , 2012 .

[11]  Junghyun Kim,et al.  The effect of uniform virtual appearance on conformity intention: Social identity model of deindividuation effects and optimal distinctiveness theory , 2011, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[12]  A. Caspi,et al.  Genetic and environmental influences on victims, bullies and bully-victims in childhood. , 2008, Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, and allied disciplines.