Subjective and objective effects of fast and slow compression on the perception of reverberant speech in listeners with hearing loss.

PURPOSE The purpose of the current study was to assess the effect of fast and slow attack/release times (ATs/RTs) on aided perception of reverberant speech in quiet. METHOD Thirty listeners with mild-to-moderate sensorineural hearing loss were tested monaurally with a commercial hearing aid programmed in 3 AT/RT settings: linear, fast (AT = 9 ms, RT = 90 ms), and slow (AT = 900 ms, RT = 1,500 ms). Stimuli consisted of 200 low-predictability Speech-Perception-in-Noise sentences, presented at 60 dB SPL at 4 reverberation levels (RT(60) = 0, 0.6, 1.2, and 3.6 s). Listeners were randomly presented with 12 listening conditions (3 AT/RT settings x 4 reverberation levels). Intelligibility scores and clarity ratings of the sentences were obtained. RESULTS Aided speech intelligibility and clarity significantly decreased as reverberation increased. Both fast and slow ATs/RTs resulted in significantly higher speech intelligibility than linear, but no significant difference was observed between fast and slow ATs/RTs. Clarity rating was similar across 3 settings; however, rating decreased the fastest with fast AT/RT as reverberation increased. Slow AT/RT resulted in significantly higher real-ear aided response than fast AT/RT and linear, despite the same programmed gain for all settings. CONCLUSION Reverberation had a more significant effect on aided speech perception than AT/RT, but fast and slow AT/RT resulted in improved speech intelligibility over linear amplification.

[1]  Mary Sue Younger,et al.  Perceptual weighting of stop consonant cues by normal and impaired listeners in reverberation versus noise. , 2007, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[2]  R. Plomp,et al.  Effect of reverberation and noise on the intelligibility of sentences in cases of presbyacusis. , 1980, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[3]  Jacob Cohen Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences , 1969, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[4]  L L Elliott,et al.  Development of a test of speech intelligibility in noise using sentence materials with controlled word predictability. , 1977, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[5]  M C Martin,et al.  Is AGC beneficial in hearing aids? , 1984, British journal of audiology.

[6]  John C. Ellison,et al.  Effect of release time on preferred gain and speech acoustics. , 2004, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology.

[7]  J M Festen,et al.  Evaluation of a wide range of amplitude-frequency responses for the hearing impaired. , 1995, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[8]  B C Moore,et al.  A comparison of four methods of implementing automatic gain control (AGC) in hearing aids. , 1988, British journal of audiology.

[9]  H Dillon,et al.  Client preferences for compression threshold in single-channel wide dynamic range compression hearing aids. , 1999, Ear and hearing.

[10]  M. Skinner,et al.  Evaluation of equivalency in two recordings of monosyllabic words. , 2006, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology.

[11]  H Levitt,et al.  Effect of compression ratio in a slow-acting compression hearing aid: paired-comparison judgments of quality. , 1994, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[12]  Lorienne M Jenstad,et al.  Quantifying the effect of compression hearing aid release time on speech acoustics and intelligibility. , 2005, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[13]  Pamela E Souza,et al.  Effects of Compression on Speech Acoustics, Intelligibility, and Sound Quality , 2002, Trends in amplification.

[14]  S. Gordon-Salant Recognition of natural and time/intensity altered CVs by young and elderly subjects with normal hearing. , 1986, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[15]  K S Helfer,et al.  Aging and consonant errors in reverberation and noise. , 1991, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[16]  K S Helfer,et al.  Binaural cues and consonant perception in reverberation and noise. , 1994, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[17]  F K Kuk Theoretical and Practical Considerations in Compression Hearing Aids , 1996, Trends in amplification.

[18]  H Levitt,et al.  Effect of release time in compression hearing aids: paired-comparison judgments of quality. , 1995, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[19]  Martin Hansen Effects of Multi-Channel Compression Time Constants on Subjectively Perceived Sound Quality and Speech Intelligibility , 2002, Ear and hearing.

[20]  S. Gordon-Salant,et al.  Profile of auditory temporal processing in older listeners. , 1999, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[21]  H Levitt,et al.  The effect of compression ratio and release time on the categorical rating of sound quality. , 1998, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[22]  J M Festen,et al.  The effect of varying the amplitude-frequency response on the masked speech-reception threshold of sentences for hearing-impaired listeners. , 1989, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[23]  B. Moore,et al.  Syllabic compression: effective compression ratios for signals modulated at different rates. , 1992, British journal of audiology.

[24]  L. Humes,et al.  A comparison of single-channel linear amplification and two-channel wide-dynamic-range-compression amplification by means of an independent-group design. , 2004, American journal of audiology.

[25]  S. Gordon-Salant,et al.  Temporal factors and speech recognition performance in young and elderly listeners. , 1993, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[26]  B. Moore,et al.  Quantifying the effects of fast-acting compression on the envelope of speech. , 2007, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[27]  John C Ellison,et al.  Interactions of hearing aid compression release time and fitting formula: effects on speech acoustics. , 2003, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology.

[28]  A. Nabelek,et al.  Monaural and binaural speech perception in reverberation for listeners of various ages. , 1982, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[29]  T Ricketts,et al.  Impact of Noise Source Configuration on Directional Hearing Aid Benefit and Performance , 2000, Ear and hearing.

[30]  B Kollmeier,et al.  Binaural noise-reduction hearing aid scheme with real-time processing in the frequency domain. , 1993, Scandinavian audiology. Supplementum.

[31]  I V Nábĕlek Performance of hearing-impaired listeners under various types of amplitude compression. , 1983, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[32]  Brian C J Moore,et al.  Side effects of fast-acting dynamic range compression that affect intelligibility in a competing speech task. , 2004, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[33]  G. Studebaker A "rationalized" arcsine transform. , 1985, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[34]  Brian C. J. Moore,et al.  The effect on speech intelligibility of varying compression time constants in a digital hearing aid , 2004, International journal of audiology.

[35]  R. Harris,et al.  Effects of room reverberation and noise on speech discrimination by the elderly. , 1985, Audiology : official organ of the International Society of Audiology.

[36]  D J Van Tasell,et al.  Measurement of speech quality as a tool to optimize the fitting of a hearing aid. , 1995, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[37]  K. Helfer,et al.  Hearing loss, aging, and speech perception in reverberation and noise. , 1990, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[38]  J. P. A. Lochner,et al.  The intelligibility of speech under reverberant conditions , 1961 .

[39]  Dianne J. Van Tasell,et al.  Hearing Loss, Speech, and Hearing Aids , 1993 .

[40]  A Goedegebure,et al.  Compression and its Effect on the Speech Signal , 1996, Ear and hearing.

[41]  L D Braida,et al.  Intelligibility of conversational and clear speech in noise and reverberation for listeners with normal and impaired hearing. , 1994, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[42]  A K Nábĕlek,et al.  Identification of vowels in quiet, noise, and reverberation: relationships with age and hearing loss. , 1988, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[43]  P E Souza,et al.  Improving audibility with nonlinear amplification for listeners with high-frequency loss. , 2000, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology.

[44]  Graham Naylor,et al.  Linear and nonlinear hearing aid fittings – 1. Patterns of benefit , 2006, International journal of audiology.

[45]  B C Moore,et al.  Comparison of different forms of compression using wearable digital hearing aids. , 1999, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[46]  R K Surr,et al.  Comparison of benefits provided by different hearing aid technologies. , 2000, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology.

[47]  T. Houtgast,et al.  The Modulation Transfer Function in Room Acoustics as a Predictor of Speech Intelligibility , 1973 .

[48]  L M Hickson Compression Amplification in Hearing Aids. , 1994, American journal of audiology.

[49]  B C Moore,et al.  A comparison of behind-the-ear high-fidelity linear hearing aids and two-channel compression aids, in the laboratory and in everyday life. , 1983, British journal of audiology.

[50]  D D Dirks,et al.  Subjective Judgments of Speech Clarity Measured by Paired Comparisons and Category Rating , 1997, Ear and hearing.

[51]  R Plomp,et al.  The negative effect of amplitude compression in multichannel hearing aids in the light of the modulation-transfer function. , 1988, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[52]  B Hagerman,et al.  The effects of different frequency responses on sound quality judgments and speech intelligibility. , 1988, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[53]  T Lunner,et al.  A Digital Filterbank Hearing Aid: Three Digital Signal Processing Algorithms‐User Preference and Performance , 1997, Ear and hearing.

[54]  G Keidser,et al.  NAL-NL1 procedure for fitting nonlinear hearing aids: characteristics and comparisons with other procedures. , 2001, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology.

[55]  C Elberling,et al.  Non-linear signal processing in digital hearing aids. , 1998, Scandinavian audiology. Supplementum.

[56]  A. Kam,et al.  Comparison of performance with wide dynamic range compression and linear amplification. , 1999, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology.

[57]  H Dillon Tutorial Compression? Yes, But for Low or High Frequencies, for Low or High Intensities, and with What Response Times? , 1996, Ear and hearing.

[58]  B C Moore,et al.  Optimization of a slow-acting automatic gain control system for use in hearing aids. , 1991, British journal of audiology.

[59]  D B Hawkins,et al.  Signal-to-noise ratio advantage of binaural hearing aids and directional microphones under different levels of reverberation. , 1984, The Journal of speech and hearing disorders.

[60]  D J Van Tasell,et al.  Effects of single-band syllabic amplitude compression on temporal speech information in nonsense syllables and in sentences. , 1996, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[61]  B Kollmeier,et al.  Real-time multiband dynamic compression and noise reduction for binaural hearing aids. , 1993, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[62]  Lorienne M Jenstad,et al.  Using Multichannel Wide-Dynamic Range Compression in Severely Hearing-Impaired Listeners: Effects on Speech Recognition and Quality , 2005, Ear and hearing.

[63]  S. Rosen Temporal information in speech: acoustic, auditory and linguistic aspects. , 1992, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[64]  A. Nabelek,et al.  Reverberant overlap- and self-masking in consonant identification. , 1989, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[65]  B Kollmeier,et al.  The effect of multichannel dynamic compression on speech intelligibility. , 1995, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[66]  D E Hayes,et al.  Double blind comparison of three hearing aid circuits with new hearing aid users , 2000, Scandinavian audiology.