Subjective and objective effects of fast and slow compression on the perception of reverberant speech in listeners with hearing loss.
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] Mary Sue Younger,et al. Perceptual weighting of stop consonant cues by normal and impaired listeners in reverberation versus noise. , 2007, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.
[2] R. Plomp,et al. Effect of reverberation and noise on the intelligibility of sentences in cases of presbyacusis. , 1980, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[3] Jacob Cohen. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences , 1969, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.
[4] L L Elliott,et al. Development of a test of speech intelligibility in noise using sentence materials with controlled word predictability. , 1977, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[5] M C Martin,et al. Is AGC beneficial in hearing aids? , 1984, British journal of audiology.
[6] John C. Ellison,et al. Effect of release time on preferred gain and speech acoustics. , 2004, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology.
[7] J M Festen,et al. Evaluation of a wide range of amplitude-frequency responses for the hearing impaired. , 1995, Journal of speech and hearing research.
[8] B C Moore,et al. A comparison of four methods of implementing automatic gain control (AGC) in hearing aids. , 1988, British journal of audiology.
[9] H Dillon,et al. Client preferences for compression threshold in single-channel wide dynamic range compression hearing aids. , 1999, Ear and hearing.
[10] M. Skinner,et al. Evaluation of equivalency in two recordings of monosyllabic words. , 2006, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology.
[11] H Levitt,et al. Effect of compression ratio in a slow-acting compression hearing aid: paired-comparison judgments of quality. , 1994, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[12] Lorienne M Jenstad,et al. Quantifying the effect of compression hearing aid release time on speech acoustics and intelligibility. , 2005, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.
[13] Pamela E Souza,et al. Effects of Compression on Speech Acoustics, Intelligibility, and Sound Quality , 2002, Trends in amplification.
[14] S. Gordon-Salant. Recognition of natural and time/intensity altered CVs by young and elderly subjects with normal hearing. , 1986, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[15] K S Helfer,et al. Aging and consonant errors in reverberation and noise. , 1991, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[16] K S Helfer,et al. Binaural cues and consonant perception in reverberation and noise. , 1994, Journal of speech and hearing research.
[17] F K Kuk. Theoretical and Practical Considerations in Compression Hearing Aids , 1996, Trends in amplification.
[18] H Levitt,et al. Effect of release time in compression hearing aids: paired-comparison judgments of quality. , 1995, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[19] Martin Hansen. Effects of Multi-Channel Compression Time Constants on Subjectively Perceived Sound Quality and Speech Intelligibility , 2002, Ear and hearing.
[20] S. Gordon-Salant,et al. Profile of auditory temporal processing in older listeners. , 1999, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.
[21] H Levitt,et al. The effect of compression ratio and release time on the categorical rating of sound quality. , 1998, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[22] J M Festen,et al. The effect of varying the amplitude-frequency response on the masked speech-reception threshold of sentences for hearing-impaired listeners. , 1989, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[23] B. Moore,et al. Syllabic compression: effective compression ratios for signals modulated at different rates. , 1992, British journal of audiology.
[24] L. Humes,et al. A comparison of single-channel linear amplification and two-channel wide-dynamic-range-compression amplification by means of an independent-group design. , 2004, American journal of audiology.
[25] S. Gordon-Salant,et al. Temporal factors and speech recognition performance in young and elderly listeners. , 1993, Journal of speech and hearing research.
[26] B. Moore,et al. Quantifying the effects of fast-acting compression on the envelope of speech. , 2007, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[27] John C Ellison,et al. Interactions of hearing aid compression release time and fitting formula: effects on speech acoustics. , 2003, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology.
[28] A. Nabelek,et al. Monaural and binaural speech perception in reverberation for listeners of various ages. , 1982, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[29] T Ricketts,et al. Impact of Noise Source Configuration on Directional Hearing Aid Benefit and Performance , 2000, Ear and hearing.
[30] B Kollmeier,et al. Binaural noise-reduction hearing aid scheme with real-time processing in the frequency domain. , 1993, Scandinavian audiology. Supplementum.
[31] I V Nábĕlek. Performance of hearing-impaired listeners under various types of amplitude compression. , 1983, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[32] Brian C J Moore,et al. Side effects of fast-acting dynamic range compression that affect intelligibility in a competing speech task. , 2004, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[33] G. Studebaker. A "rationalized" arcsine transform. , 1985, Journal of speech and hearing research.
[34] Brian C. J. Moore,et al. The effect on speech intelligibility of varying compression time constants in a digital hearing aid , 2004, International journal of audiology.
[35] R. Harris,et al. Effects of room reverberation and noise on speech discrimination by the elderly. , 1985, Audiology : official organ of the International Society of Audiology.
[36] D J Van Tasell,et al. Measurement of speech quality as a tool to optimize the fitting of a hearing aid. , 1995, Journal of speech and hearing research.
[37] K. Helfer,et al. Hearing loss, aging, and speech perception in reverberation and noise. , 1990, Journal of speech and hearing research.
[38] J. P. A. Lochner,et al. The intelligibility of speech under reverberant conditions , 1961 .
[39] Dianne J. Van Tasell,et al. Hearing Loss, Speech, and Hearing Aids , 1993 .
[40] A Goedegebure,et al. Compression and its Effect on the Speech Signal , 1996, Ear and hearing.
[41] L D Braida,et al. Intelligibility of conversational and clear speech in noise and reverberation for listeners with normal and impaired hearing. , 1994, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[42] A K Nábĕlek,et al. Identification of vowels in quiet, noise, and reverberation: relationships with age and hearing loss. , 1988, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[43] P E Souza,et al. Improving audibility with nonlinear amplification for listeners with high-frequency loss. , 2000, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology.
[44] Graham Naylor,et al. Linear and nonlinear hearing aid fittings – 1. Patterns of benefit , 2006, International journal of audiology.
[45] B C Moore,et al. Comparison of different forms of compression using wearable digital hearing aids. , 1999, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[46] R K Surr,et al. Comparison of benefits provided by different hearing aid technologies. , 2000, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology.
[47] T. Houtgast,et al. The Modulation Transfer Function in Room Acoustics as a Predictor of Speech Intelligibility , 1973 .
[48] L M Hickson. Compression Amplification in Hearing Aids. , 1994, American journal of audiology.
[49] B C Moore,et al. A comparison of behind-the-ear high-fidelity linear hearing aids and two-channel compression aids, in the laboratory and in everyday life. , 1983, British journal of audiology.
[50] D D Dirks,et al. Subjective Judgments of Speech Clarity Measured by Paired Comparisons and Category Rating , 1997, Ear and hearing.
[51] R Plomp,et al. The negative effect of amplitude compression in multichannel hearing aids in the light of the modulation-transfer function. , 1988, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[52] B Hagerman,et al. The effects of different frequency responses on sound quality judgments and speech intelligibility. , 1988, Journal of speech and hearing research.
[53] T Lunner,et al. A Digital Filterbank Hearing Aid: Three Digital Signal Processing Algorithms‐User Preference and Performance , 1997, Ear and hearing.
[54] G Keidser,et al. NAL-NL1 procedure for fitting nonlinear hearing aids: characteristics and comparisons with other procedures. , 2001, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology.
[55] C Elberling,et al. Non-linear signal processing in digital hearing aids. , 1998, Scandinavian audiology. Supplementum.
[56] A. Kam,et al. Comparison of performance with wide dynamic range compression and linear amplification. , 1999, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology.
[57] H Dillon. Tutorial Compression? Yes, But for Low or High Frequencies, for Low or High Intensities, and with What Response Times? , 1996, Ear and hearing.
[58] B C Moore,et al. Optimization of a slow-acting automatic gain control system for use in hearing aids. , 1991, British journal of audiology.
[59] D B Hawkins,et al. Signal-to-noise ratio advantage of binaural hearing aids and directional microphones under different levels of reverberation. , 1984, The Journal of speech and hearing disorders.
[60] D J Van Tasell,et al. Effects of single-band syllabic amplitude compression on temporal speech information in nonsense syllables and in sentences. , 1996, Journal of speech and hearing research.
[61] B Kollmeier,et al. Real-time multiband dynamic compression and noise reduction for binaural hearing aids. , 1993, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.
[62] Lorienne M Jenstad,et al. Using Multichannel Wide-Dynamic Range Compression in Severely Hearing-Impaired Listeners: Effects on Speech Recognition and Quality , 2005, Ear and hearing.
[63] S. Rosen. Temporal information in speech: acoustic, auditory and linguistic aspects. , 1992, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.
[64] A. Nabelek,et al. Reverberant overlap- and self-masking in consonant identification. , 1989, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[65] B Kollmeier,et al. The effect of multichannel dynamic compression on speech intelligibility. , 1995, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[66] D E Hayes,et al. Double blind comparison of three hearing aid circuits with new hearing aid users , 2000, Scandinavian audiology.