Tacit user and developer frames in user-led collection development: the case of the digital water education library

This paper discusses the impact that developers' and users' tacit understandings can have on digital library development. It draws on three years of ethnographic research with the Digital Water Education Library (DWEL) that focused on the observation, collection, and analysis of the project's face-to-face and electronic organizational communication. The DWEL project involved formal and informal educators in the development of its collection, and experienced problems at the start of the project with getting these educators to complete their cataloguing tasks. The research showed that despite having spent several days in face-to-face workshops, the project's Pis and the educators had different tacit understandings of what digital libraries were, that were impeding the project's organizational communication and workflow. I describe how these differences were identified and analyzed, and subsequently addressed and mediated through the design and development of online tools that acted as boundary objects between the PIs and the educators

[1]  Pelle Ehn,et al.  Playing the language-games of design and use-on skill and participation , 1988, COCS '88.

[2]  C. Geertz The interpretation of cultures: Selected essays , 1975 .

[3]  Etienne Wenger,et al.  Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity , 1998 .

[4]  Michael Khoo,et al.  Ethnography, Evaluation, and Design as Integrated Strategies: A Case Study from WES , 2001, ECDL.

[5]  T. Kuhn The Structure of Scientific Revolutions 2nd edition , 1970 .

[6]  Haridimos Tsoukas,et al.  Do we really understand tacit knowledge , 2002 .

[7]  C. P. Goodman,et al.  The Tacit Dimension , 2003 .

[8]  Michael Khoo,et al.  The Use of Visual Artifacts in the User-Informed Development of an Educational Digital Library Collection , 2006, J. Digit. Inf..

[9]  Etienne Wenger,et al.  Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation , 1991 .

[10]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  Technological frames: making sense of information technology in organizations , 1994, TOIS.

[11]  S. Barley Technology as an occasion for structuring: evidence from observations of CT scanners and the social order of radiology departments. , 1986, Administrative science quarterly.

[12]  Michael Khoo Community design of DLESE's collections review policy: a technological frames analysis , 2001, JCDL '01.

[13]  R. Lamb,et al.  Of Bicycles, Bakelites, and Bulbs: Toward a Theory of Sociotechnical Change , 1996, Inf. Process. Manag..

[14]  R. Westrum The Social Construction of Technological Systems , 1989 .

[15]  Joseph D. Novak,et al.  Learning creating and using knowledge: Concept maps as facilitative tools , 1998 .

[16]  Pelle Ehn,et al.  Work-oriented design of computer artifacts , 1989 .

[17]  Loizos Heracleous,et al.  Organizational Change as Discourse: Communicative Actions and Deep Structures in the Context of Information Technology Implementation , 2001 .

[18]  Susan Leigh Star,et al.  Institutional Ecology, `Translations' and Boundary Objects: Amateurs and Professionals in Berkeley's Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907-39 , 1989 .

[19]  Steven R. Corman,et al.  Studying Complex Discursive Systems: Centering Resonance Analysis of Communication. , 2002 .