Lifecycle carbon implications of conventional and low-energy multi-storey timber building systems

A consequential-based lifecycle approach is used here to explore the carbon implications of conventional and low-energy versions of three timber multi-storey building systems. The building systems are made of massive wood using cross laminated timber (CLT) elements; beam-and-column using glulam and laminated veneer lumber (LVL) elements; and prefabricated modules using light-frame volume elements. The analysis encompasses the entire resource chains during the lifecycle of the buildings, and tracks the flows of carbon from fossil energy, industrial process reactions, changes in carbon stocks in materials, and potential avoided fossil emissions from substitution of fossil energy by woody residues. The results show that the low-energy version of the CLT building gives the lowest lifecycle carbon emission while the conventional version of the beam-and-column building gives the highest lifecycle emission. Compared to the conventional designs, the low-energy designs reduce the total carbon emissions (excluding from tap water heating and household and facility electricity) by 9%, 8% and 9% for the CLT, beam-and-column and modular systems, respectively, for a 50-year lifespan located in Vaxjo. The relative significance of the construction materials to the fossil carbon emission varies for the different energy-efficiency levels of the buildings, with insulation dominating for the low-energy houses and plasterboard dominating for the conventional houses.

[1]  Christopher A. Bolin,et al.  Life cycle assessment of borate-treated lumber with comparison to galvanized steel framing , 2011 .

[2]  Leif Gustavsson,et al.  Towards a Standard Methodology for Greenhouse Gas Balances of Bioenergy Systems in Comparison with Fossil Energy Systems , 1997 .

[3]  Doyoon Kim,et al.  Preliminary Life Cycle Analysis of Modular and Conventional Housing in Benton Harbor, MI , 2008 .

[4]  L. Gustavsson,et al.  Life cycle primary energy analysis of residential buildings , 2010 .

[5]  L. Gustavsson,et al.  CO2 Mitigation: On Methods and Parameters for Comparison of Fossil-Fuel and Biofuel Systems , 2006 .

[6]  Frank Werner,et al.  Wooden building products in comparative LCA: A literature review , 2007 .

[7]  Lukas H. Meyer,et al.  Summary for Policymakers , 2022, The Ocean and Cryosphere in a Changing Climate.

[8]  Steffen Lehmann,et al.  Sustainable Construction for Urban Infill Development Using Engineered Massive Wood Panel Systems , 2012 .

[9]  Ambrose Dodoo,et al.  Effect of thermal mass on life cycle primary energy balances of a concrete- and a wood-frame building , 2012 .

[10]  Ambrose Dodoo,et al.  Carbon implications of end-of-life management of building materials. , 2009 .

[11]  Jennifer O'Connor,et al.  Survey on actual service lives for North American buildings , 2004 .

[12]  Per-Erik Eriksson,et al.  Life Cycle Assessment of Different Building Systems : The Wälludden Case Study , 2013 .

[13]  Anne-Marie Tillman,et al.  LCA of building frame structures : environmetal impact over the life cycle of wooden and concrete frames , 1997 .

[14]  Ambrose Dodoo,et al.  Effects of Future Climate Change Scenarios on Overheating Risk and Primary Energy Use for Swedish Residential Buildings , 2014 .

[15]  Krushna Mahapatra,et al.  Perceptions, attitudes and interest of Swedish architects towards the use of wood frames in multi-storey buildings , 2011 .

[16]  Leif Gustavsson,et al.  Swedish biomass strategies to reduce CO2 emission and oil use in an EU context , 2012 .

[17]  Roger Sathre,et al.  Life-Cycle Energy and Carbon Implications of Wood-Based Products and Construction , 2007 .

[18]  L. Gustavsson,et al.  Variability in energy and carbon dioxide balances of wood and concrete building materials , 2006 .

[19]  John Holmberg,et al.  Concrete vs. wood in buildings – An energy system approach , 2012 .

[20]  Leif Gustavsson,et al.  A state-of-the-art review of energy and climate effects of wood product substitution , 2009 .

[21]  Birger Solberg,et al.  Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Costs over the Life Cycle of Wood and Alternative Flooring Materials , 2004 .

[22]  J Krook,et al.  Swedish recovered wood waste: linking regulation and contamination. , 2008, Waste management.

[23]  Ambrose Dodoo,et al.  Building energy-efficiency standards in a life cycle primary energy perspective , 2011 .

[24]  Roger Sathre,et al.  Costs and CO2 benefits of recovering, refining and transporting logging residues for fossil fuel replacement , 2011 .

[25]  Ambrose Dodoo,et al.  Life cycle primary energy use and carbon footprint of wood-frame conventional and passive houses with biomass-based energy supply , 2013 .

[26]  Pushpam Kumar.  Agriculture (Chapter8) in IPCC, 2007: Climate change 2007: Mitigation of Climate Change. Contribution of Working Group III to the Fourth assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change , 2007 .

[27]  Leif Gustavsson,et al.  Primary energy and greenhouse gas implications of increasing biomass production through forest fertilization , 2010 .

[28]  Ambrose Dodoo,et al.  Recycling of Lumber , 2014 .

[29]  Vincent R. Gray.  Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis Summary for Policymakers , 2007 .

[30]  Ambrose Dodoo,et al.  Primary energy implications of end-use energy efficiency measures in district heated buildings , 2011 .

[31]  Tine Steen Larsen,et al.  Overheating and Insufficient Heating Problems in Low Energy Houses up to Now Call for Improvements in Future , 2011 .

[32]  Leif Gustavsson,et al.  Multi‐storey wood‐frame buildings in Germany, Sweden and the UK , 2012 .

[33]  John S. Monahan,et al.  An embodied carbon and energy analysis of modern methods of construction in housing: A case study us , 2011 .

[34]  Leif Gustavsson,et al.  Using wood products to mitigate climate change: External costs and structural change , 2009 .

[35]  Robert H. Crawford,et al.  Life cycle greenhouse gas emissions and energy analysis of prefabricated reusable building modules , 2012 .

[36]  Jamie Meil,et al.  Prospects for carbon-neutral housing: the influence of greater wood use on the carbon footprint of a single-family residence , 2009 .

[37]  Judd Harrison Michael,et al.  Safety in the wood products industry , 2004 .

[38]  Aie,et al.  World Energy Outlook 2013 , 2013 .

[39]  R. Judkoff,et al.  Applying the building energy simulation test (BESTEST) diagnostic method to verification of space conditioning equipment models used in whole-building energy simulation programs , 2002 .

[40]  Bruce Lippke,et al.  Environmental performance improvement in residential construction: The impact of products, biofuels, and processes. , 2006 .

[41]  Andrew H. Buchanan,et al.  Energy and carbon dioxide implications of building construction , 1994 .

[42]  Anna Bengtson,et al.  Framing Technological Development in a Concrete Context : The Use of Wood in the Swedish Construction Industry , 2003 .

[43]  F. Creutzig,et al.  Using Attributional Life Cycle Assessment to Estimate Climate‐Change Mitigation Benefits Misleads Policy Makers , 2014 .

[44]  English Version,et al.  Sustainability of construction works - Assessment of environmental performance of buildings - Calculation method , 2010 .

[45]  Steffen Lehmann,et al.  Low carbon construction systems using prefabricated engineered solid wood panels for urban infill to significantly reduce greenhouse gas emissions , 2013 .

[46]  L. Gustavsson,et al.  Energy and CO2 analysis of wood substitution in construction , 2011 .

[47]  Lars-Erik Harderup,et al.  Control of moisture safety design by comparison between calculations and measurements in passive house walls made of wood , 2011 .

[48]  Leif Gustavsson,et al.  Life cycle primary energy use and carbon emission of an eight-storey wood-framed apartment building , 2010 .

[49]  Ambrose Dodoo,et al.  Energy implications of end-of-life options for building materials , 2008 .

[50]  Leif Gustavsson,et al.  Carbon Dioxide Balance of Wood Substitution: Comparing Concrete- and Wood-Framed Buildings , 2006 .

[51]  Robert H. Falk,et al.  Recovering wood for reuse and recycling : a United States perspective , 2004 .

[52]  Bruce Lippke,et al.  CORRIM: Life-Cycle Environmental Performance of Renewable Building Materials , 2004 .

[53]  Magnus Larsson,et al.  Multi-storey modular manoeuvres : Innovative architectural stacking methodology based on three Swedish timber building systems , 2012 .

[54]  Other.  Buildings and Climate Change: Status, Challenges and opportunities , 2007 .

[55]  Solof Mundt Petersen,et al.  WOOD IN CARBON EFFICIENT CONSTRUCTION - Tools, methods and applications , 2013 .

[56]  Bruce Lippke,et al.  The Environmental Performance of Renewable Building Materials in the Context of Residential Construction , 2007 .

[57]  Ambrose Dodoo,et al.  Report on methodological issues in determining primary energy and greenhouse gas balances over a building life cycle. Methodological report of Work Package 1 for €CO2 project , 2012 .

[58]  E. Holleris Petersen,et al.  Life-cycle assessment of four multi-family buildings , 2001 .

[59]  P. Koch.  Wood versus nonwood materials in U. S. residential construction; Some energy-related global implications , 1992 .

[60]  Linda S. Heath,et al.  The greenhouse gas and energy impacts of using wood instead of alternatives in residential construction in the United States , 2008 .

[61]  Ambrose Dodoo,et al.  Lifecycle primary energy analysis of conventional and passive houses , 2012 .

[62]  John D. Quale,et al.  Construction Matters: Comparing Environmental Impacts of Building Modular and Conventional Homes in the United States , 2012 .

[63]  F. Gao,et al.  Life Cycle Energy Consumption and Carbon Dioxide Emission of Residential Building Designs in Beijing , 2012 .

[64]  Hans Joachim Blaß,et al.  Statistics of damages to timber structures in Germany , 2011 .

[65]  Max H. Sherman,et al.  Building airtightness: Research and practice , 2004 .

[66]  R. Sathre,et al.  Meta-analysis of greenhouse gas displacement factors of wood product substitution , 2010 .

[67]  Nickolas J. Themelis,et al.  Methane generation in landfills , 2007 .

[68]  Frank Werner,et al.  Wooden building products in comparative LCA , 2007 .

[69]  L. Gustavsson,et al.  Life cycle impacts of forest management and wood utilization on carbon mitigation: knowns and unknowns , 2011 .