Pairwise graphical models for structural health monitoring with dense sensor arrays

Abstract Through advances in sensor technology and development of camera-based measurement techniques, it has become affordable to obtain high spatial resolution data from structures. Although measured datasets become more informative by increasing the number of sensors, the spatial dependencies between sensor data are increased at the same time. Therefore, appropriate data analysis techniques are needed to handle the inference problem in presence of these dependencies. In this paper, we propose a novel approach that uses graphical models (GM) for considering the spatial dependencies between sensor measurements in dense sensor networks or arrays to improve damage localization accuracy in structural health monitoring (SHM) application. Because there are always unobserved damaged states in this application, the available information is insufficient for learning the GMs. To overcome this challenge, we propose an approximated model that uses the mutual information between sensor measurements to learn the GMs. The study is backed by experimental validation of the method on two test structures. The first is a three-story two-bay steel model structure that is instrumented by MEMS accelerometers. The second experimental setup consists of a plate structure and a video camera to measure the displacement field of the plate. Our results show that considering the spatial dependencies by the proposed algorithm can significantly improve damage localization accuracy.

[1]  Peter Avitabile,et al.  3D digital image correlation methods for full-field vibration measurement , 2011 .

[2]  Frédo Durand,et al.  Modal identification of simple structures with high-speed video using motion magnification , 2015 .

[3]  William T. Freeman,et al.  Presented at: 2nd Annual IEEE International Conference on Image , 1995 .

[4]  Frédo Durand,et al.  Eulerian video magnification for revealing subtle changes in the world , 2012, ACM Trans. Graph..

[5]  O. Büyüköztürk,et al.  Damage detection with small data set using energy‐based nonlinear features , 2016 .

[6]  S. Billings,et al.  A bound for the magnitude characteristics of nonlinear output frequency response functions Part 1. Analysis and computation , 1996 .

[7]  K. Krishnan Nair,et al.  Time Series Based Structural Damage Detection Algorithm Using Gaussian Mixtures , 2007 .

[8]  Shyjan Mahamud,et al.  Comparing Belief Propagation and Graph Cuts for Novelty Detection , 2006, 2006 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR'06).

[9]  W. Bastiaan Kleijn,et al.  Gaussian mixture model based mutual information estimation between frequency bands in speech , 2002, 2002 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing.

[10]  H. Bethe Statistical Theory of Superlattices , 1935 .

[11]  Charles R. Farrar,et al.  A review of nonlinear dynamics applications to structural health monitoring , 2008 .

[12]  Zi-Qiang Lang,et al.  Evaluation of output frequency responses of nonlinear systems under multiple inputs , 2000 .

[13]  Michael D. Todd,et al.  Analysis of Local State Space Models for Feature Extraction in Structural Health Monitoring , 2007 .

[14]  S. A. Billings,et al.  Crack detection using nonlinear output frequency response functions - an experimental study , 2006 .

[15]  Nir Friedman,et al.  Probabilistic Graphical Models - Principles and Techniques , 2009 .

[16]  N. Huang,et al.  The empirical mode decomposition and the Hilbert spectrum for nonlinear and non-stationary time series analysis , 1998, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[17]  William T. Freeman,et al.  Understanding belief propagation and its generalizations , 2003 .

[18]  Shih-Hsun Yin,et al.  Structural health monitoring based on sensitivity vector fields and attractor morphing , 2006, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[19]  Rob J Hyndman,et al.  Computing and Graphing Highest Density Regions , 1996 .

[20]  Adrian Weller,et al.  Methods for Inference in Graphical Models , 2014 .

[21]  Frédo Durand,et al.  Phase-based video motion processing , 2013, ACM Trans. Graph..

[22]  Yaser Sheikh,et al.  Bayesian object detection in dynamic scenes , 2005, 2005 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR'05).

[23]  Dmitry Kamenetsky,et al.  Ising Graphical Model , 2010 .

[24]  Marc M. Van Hulle,et al.  A phase-based approach to the estimation of the optical flow field using spatial filtering , 2002, IEEE Trans. Neural Networks.

[25]  G. Grimmett A THEOREM ABOUT RANDOM FIELDS , 1973 .

[26]  Caroline Petitjean,et al.  One class random forests , 2013, Pattern Recognit..

[27]  K. Law,et al.  Time series-based damage detection and localization algorithm with application to the ASCE benchmark structure , 2006 .

[28]  David J. Fleet,et al.  Computation of component image velocity from local phase information , 1990, International Journal of Computer Vision.

[29]  S. A. Billings,et al.  Energy transfer properties of non-linear systems in the frequency domain , 2004 .