Do ecological differences between taxonomic groups influence the relationship between species’ distributions and climate? A global meta‐analysis using species distribution models

Understanding whether and how ecological traits affect species’ geographic distributions is a fundamental issue that bridges ecology and biogeography. While climate is thought to be the major determinant of species’ distributions, there is considerable variation in the strength of species’ climate–distribution relationships. One potential explanation is that species with relatively low dispersal ability cannot reach all geographic areas where climatic conditions are suitable. We tested the hypothesis that species from different taxonomic groups varied in their climate–distribution relationships because of differences in life history strategies, in particular dispersal ability. We conducted a meta-analysis by combining the discrimination ability (AUC values) from 4317 species distribution models (SDMs) using fit as an indication of the strength of the species’ climate–distribution relationship. We found significant differences in the strength of species’ climate–distribution relationships across taxonomic groups, however we did not find support for the dispersal hypothesis. Our results suggest that relevant ecological trait variation among broad taxonomic groups may be related to differences in species’ climate–distribution relationships, however which ecological traits are important remains unclear.

[1]  C. H. Merriam.  An Anthology of Nineteenth-Century American Science Writing: “Laws of Temperature Control of the Geographic Distribution of Terrestrial Animals and Plants,” National Geographic Magazine (1894) , 2012 .

[2]  J. Hanspach,et al.  Geographical patterns in prediction errors of species distribution models , 2011 .

[3]  J. Wiens.  The niche, biogeography and species interactions , 2011, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[4]  J. Tewksbury,et al.  Do species' traits predict recent shifts at expanding range edges? , 2011, Ecology letters.

[5]  Alicia M. Frame,et al.  Species' traits predict phenological responses to climate change in butterflies. , 2011, Ecology.

[6]  Truly Santika.  Assessing the effect of prevalence on the predictive performance of species distribution models using simulated data , 2011 .

[7]  C. Graham,et al.  Evaluating the potential causes of range limits of birds of the Colombian Andes , 2010 .

[8]  Jens-Christian Svenning,et al.  Determinants of palm species distributions across Africa: the relative roles of climate, non‐climatic environmental factors, and spatial constraints , 2010 .

[9]  J. Franklin,et al.  Species traits affect the performance of species distribution models for plants in southern California , 2010 .

[10]  S. J. Tonsor,et al.  Evolutionary Time for Dispersal Limits the Extent but Not the Occupancy of Species’ Potential Ranges in the Tropical Plant Genus Psychotria (Rubiaceae) , 2009, The American Naturalist.

[11]  A. Peterson,et al.  Effects of sample size on the performance of species distribution models , 2008 .

[12]  M. Luoto,et al.  Species traits are associated with the quality of bioclimatic models , 2008 .

[13]  R. Real,et al.  AUC: a misleading measure of the performance of predictive distribution models , 2008 .

[14]  B. Huntley,et al.  Potential Impacts of Climatic Change on European Breeding Birds , 2008, PloS one.

[15]  S. Gaines,et al.  The relationship between dispersal ability and geographic range size. , 2007, Ecology letters.

[16]  Omri Allouche,et al.  A comparative evaluation of presence‐only methods for modelling species distribution , 2007 .

[17]  J. Elith,et al.  Sensitivity of predictive species distribution models to change in grain size , 2007 .

[18]  M. Luoto,et al.  The role of land cover in bioclimatic models depends on spatial resolution , 2006 .

[19]  M. Zappa,et al.  Are niche‐based species distribution models transferable in space? , 2006 .

[20]  M. Araújo,et al.  Consequences of spatial autocorrelation for niche‐based models , 2006 .

[21]  A. Townsend Peterson,et al.  Novel methods improve prediction of species' distributions from occurrence data , 2006 .

[22]  Brian Huntley,et al.  Potential impacts of climatic change upon geographical distributions of birds , 2006 .

[23]  M. Luoto,et al.  Uncertainty of bioclimate envelope models based on the geographical distribution of species , 2005 .

[24]  M. Araújo,et al.  Equilibrium of species’ distributions with climate , 2005 .

[25]  W. Thuiller,et al.  Predicting species distribution: offering more than simple habitat models. , 2005, Ecology letters.

[26]  M. Araújo,et al.  Validation of species–climate impact models under climate change , 2005 .

[27]  D. Rogers,et al.  The effects of species’ range sizes on the accuracy of distribution models: ecological phenomenon or statistical artefact? , 2004 .

[28]  A. Hampe.  Bioclimate envelope models: what they detect and what they hide , 2004 .

[29]  Wilfried Thuiller,et al.  RELATING PLANT TRAITS AND SPECIES DISTRIBUTIONS ALONG BIOCLIMATIC GRADIENTS FOR 88 LEUCADENDRON TAXA , 2004 .

[30]  W. Cramer,et al.  The performance of models relating species geographical distributions to climate is independent of trophic level , 2004 .

[31]  蒋志刚,et al.  Week 11: macroecology , 2021 .

[32]  Kevin J. Gaston,et al.  The structure and dynamics of geographic ranges , 2003 .

[33]  Antoine Guisan,et al.  Predictive habitat distribution models in ecology , 2000 .

[34]  H. Pulliam.  On the relationship between niche and distribution , 2000 .

[35]  S. Ferrier,et al.  An evaluation of alternative algorithms for fitting species distribution models using logistic regression , 2000 .

[36]  John Bell,et al.  A review of methods for the assessment of prediction errors in conservation presence/absence models , 1997, Environmental Conservation.

[37]  Dawn M. Kaufman,et al.  THE GEOGRAPHIC RANGE: Size, Shape, Boundaries, and Internal Structure , 1996 .

[38]  Brian Huntley,et al.  Climate and the distribution of Fallopia japonica: use of an introduced species to test the predictive capacity of response surfaces , 1995 .

[39]  J A Swets,et al.  Measuring the accuracy of diagnostic systems. , 1988, Science.

[40]  M. L. Goff,et al.  THE EPIZOOTIOLOGY AND ECOLOGICAL SIGNIFICANCE OF MALARIA IN HAWAIIAN LAND BIRDS , 1986 .

[41]  R. Good.  A THEORY OF PLANT GEOGRAPHY , 1931 .