Seeking health information online: does Wikipedia matter?

Design: The authors measured Wikipedia’s ranking on general Internet search engines by entering keywords from MedlinePlus, NHS Direct Online, and the National Organization of Rare Diseases as queries into search engine optimization software. We assessed whether article quality influenced this ranking. The authors tested whether traffic to Wikipedia coincided with epidemiological trends and news of emerging health concerns, and how it compares to MedlinePlus. Measurements: Cumulative incidence and average position of Wikipedia compared to other Web sites among the first 20 results on general Internet search engines (Google, Google UK, Yahoo, and MSN), and page view statistics for selected Wikipedia articles and MedlinePlus pages. Results: Wikipedia ranked among the first ten results in 71–85% of search engines and keywords tested. Wikipedia surpassed MedlinePlus and NHS Direct Online (except for queries from the latter on Google UK), and ranked higher with quality articles. Wikipedia ranked highest for rare diseases, although its incidence in several categories decreased. Page views increased parallel to the occurrence of 20 seasonal disorders and news of three emerging health concerns. Wikipedia articles were viewed more often than MedlinePlus Topic (p 0.001) but for MedlinePlus Encyclopedia pages, the trend was not significant (p 0.07–0.10). Conclusions: Based on its search engine ranking and page view statistics, the English Wikipedia is a prominent source of online health information compared to the other online health information providers studied. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2009;16:471–479. DOI 10.1197/jamia.M3059.

[1]  A Midgley.  Global medical knowledge database. New professional obligation arises. , 2000, BMJ.

[2]  J E Backus,et al.  MEDLINEplus: building and maintaining the National Library of Medicine's consumer health Web service. , 2000, Bulletin of the Medical Library Association.

[3]  B. Gerber,et al.  The Patient-Physician Relationship in the Internet Age: Future Prospects and the Research Agenda , 2001, Journal of medical Internet research.

[4]  Christian Köhler,et al.  How do consumers search for and appraise health information on the world wide web? Qualitative study using focus groups, usability tests, and in-depth interviews , 2002, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[5]  L. Baker,et al.  Use of the Internet and e-mail for health care information: results from a national survey. , 2003, JAMA.

[6]  Derek L. Hansen,et al.  Adolescents Searching for Health Information on the Internet: An Observational Study , 2003, Journal of medical Internet research.

[7]  George Phillipov,et al.  Frequency of health-related search terms on the Internet. , 2003, JAMA.

[8]  Christian Köhler,et al.  Health-related searches on the Internet. , 2004, JAMA.

[9]  D. Lorence,et al.  Setting the Public Agenda for Online Health Search: A White Paper and Action Agenda , 2004, Journal of medical Internet research.

[10]  Bob Gann,et al.  NHS Direct Online: a multi-channel eHealth service. , 2004, Studies in health technology and informatics.

[11]  Udo Altmann,et al.  Representation of Medical Informatics in the Wikipedia and its Perspectives , 2005, MIE.

[12]  J. Giles.  Internet encyclopaedias go head to head , 2005, Nature.

[13]  Fred B Wood,et al.  Use of Internet Audience Measurement Data to Gauge Market Share for Online Health Information Services , 2005, Journal of medical Internet research.

[14]  Crystale Purvis Cooper,et al.  Cancer Internet Search Activity on a Major Search Engine, United States 2001-2003 , 2005, Journal of medical Internet research.

[15]  Henry W. W. Potts,et al.  Is E-health Progressing Faster Than E-health Researchers? , 2006, Journal of medical Internet research.

[16]  Helen Pearson,et al.  Online methods share insider tricks , 2006, Nature.

[17]  Mark A. Kutner,et al.  The Health Literacy of American Adults:Results from the 2003 National Assessment of Adult Literacy. , 2006 .

[18]  Kevin Yager.  Wiki ware could harness the Internet for science , 2006, Nature.

[19]  Rod. Ward.  A request for help to improve the coverage of the NHS and UK healthcare issues on Wikipedia , 2006 .

[20]  Dean Giustini,et al.  How Web 2.0 is changing medicine , 2006, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[21]  Riaz Agha,et al.  Introducing Wikisurgery.com: the blueprint for a surgical architecture of participation. , 2006, International journal of surgery.

[22]  Richard Crespo.  Virtual Community Health Promotion , 2007, Preventing chronic disease.

[23]  Michael T. Lu,et al.  Informatics in radiology: RadiologyWiki.org: the free radiology resource that anyone can edit. , 2007, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

[24]  M. Raizada,et al.  Language Preferences on Websites and in Google Searches for Human Health and Food Information , 2007, Journal of medical Internet research.

[25]  Elaine Toms,et al.  How consumers search for health information , 2007, Health Informatics J..

[26]  Antony Le Béchec,et al.  AMYPdb: A database dedicated to amyloid precursor proteins , 2008, BMC Bioinformatics.

[27]  M. Ashburner,et al.  Calling on a million minds for community annotation in WikiProteins , 2008, Genome Biology.

[28]  Anirban Mahapatra.  Catalyzing chemical bonding--the WIKI way. , 2007, ACS chemical biology.

[29]  Finn Årup Nielsen,et al.  Scientific citations in Wikipedia , 2007, First Monday.

[30]  S. Salzberg.  Genome re-annotation: a wiki solution? , 2007, Genome Biology.

[31]  W. Kibbe,et al.  Other riffs on cooperation are already showing how well a wiki could work , 2007, Nature.

[32]  Brandon Keim.  News feature: WikiMedia , 2007, Nature Medicine.

[33]  Hyla H. Polen,et al.  Scope, Completeness, and Accuracy of Drug Information in Wikipedia , 2008, The Annals of pharmacotherapy.

[34]  Daisuke Kihara,et al.  The Emerging World of Wikis , 2008, Science.

[35]  Aaron B Caughey,et al.  Google obstetrics: who is educating our patients? , 2008, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[36]  Xiaowei Wang.  miRDB: a microRNA target prediction and functional annotation database with a wiki interface. , 2008, RNA.

[37]  J. Tate,et al.  The RNA WikiProject: community annotation of RNA families. , 2008, RNA.

[38]  Jaime Prilusky,et al.  Proteopedia - a scientific 'wiki' bridging the rift between three-dimensional structure and function of biomacromolecules , 2008, Genome Biology.

[39]  R. Hoffmann.  A wiki for the life sciences where authorship matters , 2008, Nature Genetics.

[40]  Jon W. Huss,et al.  A Gene Wiki for Community Annotation of Gene Function , 2008, PLoS biology.

[41]  Mitch Waldrop,et al.  Big data: Wikiomics , 2008, Nature.

[42]  Nils Hallenberg,et al.  Preserving accuracy in GenBank , 2008 .

[43]  Bertalan Meskó,et al.  Transdab wiki: the interactive transglutaminase substrate database on web 2.0 surface , 2009, Amino Acids.

[44]  Samir C. Grover,et al.  M1042 The Quality of Open Access and Open Source Internet Material in Gastroenterology: Is Wikipedia Appropriate for Knowledge Transfer to Patients? , 2008 .

[45]  Todd H. Stokes,et al.  ArrayWiki: an enabling technology for sharing public microarray data repositories and meta-analyses , 2008, BMC Bioinformatics.

[46]  Jeremy Ginsberg,et al.  Detecting influenza epidemics using search engine query data , 2009, Nature.

[47]  A. Hulth,et al.  Web Queries as a Source for Syndromic Surveillance , 2009, PloS one.