Development of respiratory motion reduction device system (RMRDs) for radiotherapy in moving tumors.

BACKGROUND The internal target volume (ITV) for tumors in the abdomen or thorax includes sufficient margin for breathing-related movement of tumor volumes during treatment. Depending on the location of the tumor, the magnitude of the ITV margin extends from 1 to 3 cm, which increases substantially the volume of the irradiated normal tissue, hence resulting in an increase in normal tissue complication probability (NTCP). We developed a simple and handy method which can reduce ITV margins in patients with moving tumors: the respiratory motion reduction device system (RMRDs). METHODS The patient's clinical database was structured for moving tumor patients and patient set-up error measurement and immobilization device effects were investigated. The system is composed of the respiration presser device (RPD) utilized in the prone position and the abdominal strip device (ASD) utilized in the supine position, and the analysis program, which enables analysis of patient set-up reproducibility. It was tested for analyzing the diaphragm movement from patients with RMRDs, the magnitude of the ITV margin was determined and the dose-volume histogram (DVH) was computed using treatment planning software. The dose to normal tissue in patients with and without RMRDs was analyzed by comparing the fraction of the normal liver receiving 50% of the isocenter dose. RESULTS Average diaphragm movement due to respiration was 16 +/- 1.9 mm in the case of the supine position, and 12 +/- 1.9 mm in the case of the prone position. When utilizing the RMRDs, which was personally developed in our hospital, the value was reduced to 5 +/- 1.4 mm, and in the case in which the belt immobilization device was utilized, the value was reduced to 3 +/- 0.9 mm. In the case where the strip device was utilized, the value was proven to reduce to 4 +/- 0.3 mm. As a result of analyzing the volume of normal liver where 50% of the prescription dose is irradiated in DVH according to the radiation treatment planning, the use of the RMRD can create a reduction of 30% to the maximum. Also by obtaining the digital image, the function of comparison between the standard image, automated external contour subtraction, etc. was utilized to develop a patient set-up reproducibility analysis program that can evaluate the change in patient set-up. CONCLUSION Internal organ motion due to breathing can be reduced using RMRDs, which is simple and easy to use in the clinical setting. It can reduce the organ motion-related planning target volume margin, thereby decreasing the volume of irradiated normal tissue.

[1]  G T Chen,et al.  Dose volume histogram analysis of liver radiation tolerance. , 1986, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[2]  J M Balter,et al.  Potential benefits of eliminating planning target volume expansions for patient breathing in the treatment of liver tumors. , 1997, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[3]  C. Ling,et al.  Technical aspects of the deep inspiration breath-hold technique in the treatment of thoracic cancer. , 2000, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[4]  J. Wong,et al.  The use of active breathing control (ABC) to reduce margin for breathing motion. , 1999, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[5]  R M Henkelman,et al.  How important is breathing in radiation therapy of the thorax? , 1982, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[6]  K. Langen,et al.  Organ motion and its management. , 2001, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[7]  C. Ramsey,et al.  Clinical efficacy of respiratory gated conformal radiation therapy. , 1999, Medical dosimetry : official journal of the American Association of Medical Dosimetrists.

[8]  J A Antolak,et al.  Planning target volumes for radiotherapy: how much margin is needed? , 1999, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[9]  Harold O. Wyckoff,et al.  International Commission ON Radiation Units and Measurements (ICRU). , 1974, The American journal of roentgenology, radium therapy, and nuclear medicine.

[10]  B. Movsas,et al.  Efficacy of a belly board device with CT-simulation in reducing small bowel volume within pelvic irradiation fields. , 1997, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[11]  Melvin L. Griem,et al.  Prescribing, Recording, and Reporting Photon Beam Therapy , 1994 .

[12]  J C Stroom,et al.  Internal organ motion in prostate cancer patients treated in prone and supine treatment position. , 1999, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[13]  Icru Prescribing, recording, and reporting photon beam therapy , 1993 .