Design and Evaluation of a Performance-based Adaptive Curriculum for Robotic Surgical Training: a Pilot Study

Training with simulation systems has become a primary alternative for learning the fundamental skills of robotic surgery. However, there exists no consensus regarding a standard training curriculum: sessions defined a priori by expert trainers or self-directed by the trainees feature lack of consistency. This study proposes an adaptive approach that structures the curriculum on the basis of an objective assessment of the trainee’s performance. The work comprised an experimental session with 12 participants performing training on virtual reality tasks with the da Vinci Research Kit surgical console. Half of the subjects self-managed their training session, while the others underwent the adaptive training. The final performance of the latter trainees was found to be higher compared to the former (p=0.002), showing how outcome-based, dynamic designs could constitute a promising advance in robotic surgical training.

[1]  Nima Enayati,et al.  Skill-based human–robot cooperation in tele-operated path tracking , 2017, Autonomous Robots.

[2]  A. Okamura Haptic feedback in robot-assisted minimally invasive surgery , 2009, Current opinion in urology.

[3]  M. Guadagnoli,et al.  Challenge Point: A Framework for Conceptualizing the Effects of Various Practice Conditions in Motor Learning , 2004, Journal of motor behavior.

[4]  James A. Young,et al.  Robotic Surgical Training in an Academic Institution , 2001, Annals of surgery.

[5]  S. Maeso,et al.  Efficacy of the Da Vinci Surgical System in Abdominal Surgery Compared With That of Laparoscopy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis , 2010, Annals of surgery.

[6]  Nima Enayati,et al.  Robotic Assistance-as-Needed for Enhanced Visuomotor Learning in Surgical Robotics Training: An Experimental Study , 2018, 2018 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA).

[7]  Jeannie MacDonald,et al.  Self-assessment in simulation-based surgical skills training. , 2003, American journal of surgery.

[8]  G. Maddern,et al.  Systematic review of skills transfer after surgical simulation‐based training , 2014, The British journal of surgery.

[9]  Michael Fordis,et al.  Accuracy of physician self-assessment compared with observed measures of competence: a systematic review. , 2006, JAMA.

[10]  D. Gaba The future vision of simulation in health care , 2004, Quality and Safety in Health Care.

[11]  A. Darzi,et al.  Dexterity enhancement with robotic surgery , 2004, Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques.

[12]  Charles R. Kelley,et al.  What is Adaptive Training?1 , 1969 .

[13]  Allison M. Okamura,et al.  Uncontrolled Manifold Analysis of Arm Joint Angle Variability During Robotic Teleoperation and Freehand Movement of Surgeons and Novices , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[14]  Vipul Patel,et al.  Fundamentals of robotic surgery: a course of basic robotic surgery skills based upon a 14‐society consensus template of outcomes measures and curriculum development , 2014, The international journal of medical robotics + computer assisted surgery : MRCAS.

[15]  Nabeel A. Arain,et al.  Developing a comprehensive, proficiency-based training program for robotic surgery. , 2012, Surgery.

[16]  John A. Windsor,et al.  A Systematic Review of Surgical Skills Transfer After Simulation-Based Training: Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy and Endoscopy , 2014, Annals of surgery.

[17]  Chilin Shih,et al.  An adaptive training program for tone acquisition , 2010, Speech Prosody 2010.