Factors affecting strategic change in higher education

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to identify those factors that key actors in university governance hold as to be important in realizing strategic change within their institutions. Design/methodology/approach – Key decision-makers in 26 European universities were surveyed on their views on which factors bring about strategic change. The results were interpreted using a theoretical framework emphasizing organizational archetypes and their development. Findings – The findings indicated that strategic changes in universities were perceived as highly dependent on leadership, decision-making procedures, communication and evaluation. However, some differences between the universities in the sample can be identified, supporting indicating the relevance of using organizational archetypes as an analytical tools for observing change within the higher education sector. Originality/value – The study links organizational level developments on strategic management to macro-level change within the European higher ...

[1]  W. Powell,et al.  The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis , 1992 .

[2]  W. Scott,et al.  Institutions and Organizations , 1997 .

[3]  B. Clark,et al.  The Higher Education System , 2023 .

[4]  Richard Whittington,et al.  Strategy as Practice , 1996 .

[5]  Ben R. Martin,et al.  Are universities and university research under threat? Towards an evolutionary model of university speciation , 2012 .

[6]  B. Martin,et al.  The Origin and Evolution of the University Species , 2001 .

[7]  Jean-Louis Denis,et al.  Leadership and Strategic Change under Ambiguity , 1996 .

[8]  John W. Meyer,et al.  Institutionalized Organizations: Formal Structure as Myth and Ceremony , 1977, American Journal of Sociology.

[9]  Kevin G. Corley,et al.  Organizational Identity, Image, and Adaptive Instability , 2000 .

[10]  C. Kerr.  The uses of the university , 1964 .

[11]  Maureen McKelvey,et al.  Universities as strategic actors in the knowledge economy , 2012 .

[12]  R. Whittington.  Completing the Practice Turn in Strategy Research , 2006 .

[13]  Dennis A. Gioia,et al.  Sensemaking and sensegiving in strategic change initiation , 1991 .

[14]  K. Weick.  FROM SENSEMAKING IN ORGANIZATIONS , 2021, The New Economic Sociology.

[15]  S. Ackroyd,et al.  Archetype Theory and the Changing Professional Organization: A Critique and Alternative , 2003 .

[16]  S. Kyvik.  The Dynamics of Change in Higher Education: Expansion and Contraction in an Organisational Field , 2008 .

[17]  S. Brint.  Creating the Future: ‘New Directions’ in American Research Universities , 2005 .

[18]  Majken Schultz,et al.  The Expressive Organization: Linking Identity, Reputation, and the Corporate Brand , 2000 .

[19]  P. Jarzabkowski.  Strategy as Practice: An Activity Based Approach , 2005 .

[20]  R. Greenwood,et al.  Understanding strategic change: The contribution of archetypes , 1993 .

[21]  Christine Oliver,et al.  The Dynamics of Strategic Change , 1991 .

[22]  Cinzia Daraio,et al.  Universities in the New Knowledge Landscape: Tensions, Challenges, Change—An Introduction , 2010 .

[23]  Benedetto Lepori,et al.  Patterns of strategies in Swiss higher education institutions , 2011 .

[24]  I. M. Labhrainn,et al.  International Perspectives on the Governance of Higher Education , 2009 .

[25]  Henry Mintzberg,et al.  Strategy Formation in the University Setting , 2017 .

[26]  James F. Fairbank,et al.  Emulation in Academia: Balancing Structure and Identity , 2001 .