Frequency rolling: a cooperative frequency hopping for mutually interfering wpans

A Wireless Personal Area Network (WPAN) provides wireless links among proximate devices,usually carried by an individual.As WPAN gains momentum in ubiquitous usage, the interference that collocated WPANs cause to each other, termed self-interference, becomes one of the major sources that degrade the communication performance of WPAN. This paper in roduces the Frequency Rolling (FR), a particular instance of frequency hopping (FH) that enables he collocated WPANs to cooperate and avoid the self-interference. The FR uses as input solely the observed packet error rate (PER) and it does not require any exchange of information among he collocated WPANs. The effect of the FR over a longer time in erval is hat the WPANs use he complete set of disposable channels in an implicit time-division and cooperative manner. The parameters of he FR are chosen such that a WPAN which uses FR never occupies the channels in the unlicensed spectrum more than what is permitted by the current regulation. We compare the goodput offered by FR to the goodput of the collocated piconets when conventional pseudorandom FH is used. Our simulation results show that FR has superior goodput performance. In addition, he design of FR is made robust owards the errors due to the channel noise. Some guidance for practical fault-toleran design and future extensions of FR are given. All hese features promote the great potential of FR as a coexistence mechanism for unlicensed operation.

[1]  Tracy Camp,et al.  A survey of mobility models for ad hoc network research , 2002, Wirel. Commun. Mob. Comput..

[2]  Ramesh R. Rao,et al.  Coexistence mechanisms for interference mitigation between IEEE 802.11 WLANs and Bluetooth , 2002, Proceedings.Twenty-First Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications Societies.

[3]  Dharma P. Agrawal,et al.  Mitigating the effects of intermittent interference on Bluetooth ad hoc networks , 2002, The 13th IEEE International Symposium on Personal, Indoor and Mobile Radio Communications.

[4]  Andrea Zanella,et al.  On the impact of fading and inter-piconet interference on Bluetooth performance , 2002, The 5th International Symposium on Wireless Personal Multimedia Communications.

[5]  Leonard Kleinrock,et al.  Queueing Systems: Volume I-Theory , 1975 .

[6]  Gianni Pasolini Bluetooth piconets coexistence: analytical investigation on the optimal operating conditions , 2003, IEEE International Conference on Communications, 2003. ICC '03..

[7]  Yu-Chee Tseng,et al.  Collision analysis for a multi-Bluetooth picocells environment , 2003, IEEE Communications Letters.

[8]  Ramjee Prasad,et al.  Adaptive Radio Resource Sharing for Collocated Wireless Personal Area Networks , 2003 .

[9]  Amre El-Hoiydi Interference between Bluetooth networks-upper bound on the packet error rate , 2001, IEEE Communications Letters.

[10]  Leonard Kleinrock,et al.  Theory, Volume 1, Queueing Systems , 1975 .

[11]  Dajana Cassioli,et al.  Evaluation of packet loss probability in Bluetooth networks , 2002, 2002 IEEE International Conference on Communications. Conference Proceedings. ICC 2002 (Cat. No.02CH37333).