Ultra-low-dose CT with model-based iterative reconstruction (MBIR): detection of ground-glass nodules in an anthropomorphic phantom study

PurposeThe authors sought to evaluate the effect of model-based iterative reconstruction (MBIR) on the sensitivity of ground-glass nodule (GGN) detection at different dose levels.Materials and methodsFifty-four artificial GGN were randomly divided into three sets, each positioned in an anthropomorphic phantom. The three sets were evaluated on standard-dose (SD, 350 mA), low-dose (LD, 35 mA) and ultra-low-dose (ULD, 10 mA) CT scans (100 kV, 64 × 0.625 mm, 0.5 s), and each scan was reconstructed twice with filtered back projection (FBP) and MBIR. Three radiologists independently evaluated the scans for GGN presence and size. SD + FBP was considered the reference standard. A region of interest (ROI) was used to calculate signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and contrast-to-noise ratio normalised to dose (CNRD). McNemar’s test, Bland–Altman analysis and t test were used for statistical assessment (p < 0.05).ResultsThe mean diameter of the 54 GGNs was 9.2 mm (range 3.7–17.3 mm). For the three readers, no statistically significant differences were observed in the sensitivity of GGN detection between LD + MBIR, ULD + MBIR and SD + FBP (p > 0.05). Bland–Altman analysis showed a good reader agreement (±1.5 mm) for GGN size between SD + FBP and ULD + MBIR. For low dose and ultra-low dose, the SNR and CNRD were significantly higher with MBIR (p < 0.0001). The effective dose was 97.1 % lower with ultra-low dose (0.15 mSv) than standard dose (5.15 mSv).ConclusionsThe detection of GGN with MBIR at low-dose and ultra-low-dose CT does not differ significantly from standard-dose CT with FBP in an anthropomorphic phantom.

[1]  Naoki Nagasawa,et al.  CT of the chest with model-based, fully iterative reconstruction: comparison with adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction , 2013, BMC Medical Imaging.

[2]  J. Albert,et al.  Radiation risk from CT: implications for cancer screening. , 2013, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[3]  Walter Huda,et al.  Volume CT dose index and dose-length product displayed during CT: what good are they? , 2011, Radiology.

[4]  Sana Boudabbous,et al.  Computed tomography of the chest with model-based iterative reconstruction using a radiation exposure similar to chest X-ray examination: preliminary observations , 2013, European Radiology.

[5]  D. O'Leary,et al.  Low-dose abdominal CT for diagnosing appendicitis. , 2012, The New England journal of medicine.

[6]  M. Macari,et al.  Colorectal neoplasms: prospective comparison of thin-section low-dose multi-detector row CT colonography and conventional colonoscopy for detection. , 2002, Radiology.

[7]  D. Brenner,et al.  Computed tomography--an increasing source of radiation exposure. , 2007, The New England journal of medicine.

[8]  M. Revel,et al.  Are two-dimensional CT measurements of small noncalcified pulmonary nodules reliable? , 2004, Radiology.

[9]  Masaki Katsura,et al.  Model-Based Iterative Reconstruction Technique for Ultralow-Dose Chest CT: Comparison of Pulmonary Nodule Detectability With the Adaptive Statistical Iterative Reconstruction Technique , 2013, Investigative radiology.

[10]  A. Sodickson,et al.  Recurrent CT, cumulative radiation exposure, and associated radiation-induced cancer risks from CT of adults. , 2009, Radiology.

[11]  O. Woo,et al.  Accuracy of lung nodule volumetry in low-dose CT with iterative reconstruction: an anthropomorphic thoracic phantom study. , 2014, The British journal of radiology.

[12]  A. Beckett,et al.  AKUFO AND IBARAPA. , 1965, Lancet.

[13]  Jin Mo Goo,et al.  Influence of radiation dose and iterative reconstruction algorithms for measurement accuracy and reproducibility of pulmonary nodule volumetry: A phantom study. , 2014, European journal of radiology.

[14]  Jack Valentin,et al.  The 2007 Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. ICRP publication 103. , 2007, Annals of the ICRP.

[15]  R. Sievert,et al.  Book Reviews : Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection (as amended 1959 and revised 1962). I.C.R.P. Publication 6. 70 pp. PERGAMON PRESS. Oxford, London and New York, 1964. £1 5s. 0d. [TB/54] , 1964 .

[16]  D. Aberle,et al.  Results of initial low-dose computed tomographic screening for lung cancer. , 2013, The New England journal of medicine.

[17]  S. Stevens,et al.  Radiation and chest CT scan examinations: what do we know? , 2012, Chest.

[18]  C. Gatsonis,et al.  Reduced Lung-Cancer Mortality with Low-Dose Computed Tomographic Screening , 2012 .

[19]  J M Bland,et al.  Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement , 1986 .

[20]  W. Huda,et al.  Effective doses in radiology and diagnostic nuclear medicine: a catalog. , 2008, Radiology.

[21]  D. Naidich,et al.  Overview and Strategic Management of Subsolid Pulmonary Nodules , 2012, Journal of thoracic imaging.

[22]  Hiroaki Sugiura,et al.  Model-Based Iterative Reconstruction Technique for Ultralow-Dose Computed Tomography of the Lung: A Pilot Study , 2012, Investigative radiology.

[23]  D. Altman,et al.  STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT , 1986, The Lancet.

[24]  Low-Dose Computed Tomography of the Chest Using Iterative Reconstruction Versus Filtered Back Projection: Comparison of Image Quality , 2012, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[25]  Bernhard Hemmer,et al.  Transcranial Doppler ultrasonography predicts cardiovascular events after TIA , 2009, BMC Medical Imaging.

[26]  Wen He,et al.  Impact of the adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction technique on image quality in ultra-low-dose CT. , 2013, Clinical radiology.

[27]  O. Miettinen,et al.  CT screening for lung cancer: frequency and significance of part-solid and nonsolid nodules. , 2002, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[28]  Francis R Verdun,et al.  Iterative reconstruction methods in two different MDCT scanners: physical metrics and 4-alternative forced-choice detectability experiments--a phantom approach. , 2013, Physica medica : PM : an international journal devoted to the applications of physics to medicine and biology : official journal of the Italian Association of Biomedical Physics.

[29]  A. Christe,et al.  Accuracy of low-dose computed tomography (CT) for detecting and characterizing the most common CT-patterns of pulmonary disease. , 2013, European journal of radiology.

[30]  Persistent pulmonary subsolid nodules: model-based iterative reconstruction for nodule classification and measurement variability on low-dose CT , 2014, European Radiology.

[31]  Alvin C. Silva,et al.  Innovations in CT dose reduction strategy: application of the adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction algorithm. , 2010, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[32]  Masaki Katsura,et al.  Model-based iterative reconstruction technique for radiation dose reduction in chest CT: comparison with the adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction technique , 2012, European Radiology.