Game creativity analysis using neural networks

Abstract Experts in ball games are characterized by extraordinary creative behaviour. This article outlines a framework for analysing types of individual development of creative performance based on neural networks. Therefore, two kinds of sport-specific training programme for the learning of game creativity in real field contexts were investigated. Two training groups (soccer, n = 20; field hockey, n = 17) but not a control group (n = 18) improved with respect to three measuring points (P < 0.001), although no difference could be established between the two training groups (P = 0.212). By using neural networks it is now possible to distinguish between five types of learning behaviour in the development of performance, the most striking ones being what we call “up-down” and “down-up”. In the field hockey group in particular, an up-down fluctuation process was identified, whereby creative performance increases initially, but at the end is worse than in the middle of the training programme. The reverse down-up fluctuation process was identified mainly in the soccer group. The results are discussed with regard to recent training explanation models, such as the super-compensation theory, with a view to further development of neural network applications.

[1]  R. Sternberg,et al.  The Cambridge handbook of creativity. , 2010 .

[2]  Margaret A. Boden,et al.  Computer Models of Creativity , 2009, AI Mag..

[3]  Jürgen Perl,et al.  Analysis and simulation of creativity learning by means of artificial neural networks. , 2009, Human movement science.

[4]  Daniel Memmert,et al.  The effects of non-specific and specific concepts on tactical creativity in team ball sports , 2007, Journal of sports sciences.

[5]  Daniel Memmert,et al.  Can Creativity Be Improved by an Attention-Broadening Training Program? An Exploratory Study Focusing on Team Sports , 2007 .

[6]  A. Dietrich,et al.  Who's afraid of a cognitive neuroscience of creativity? , 2007, Methods.

[7]  M. Reuter The Biological Basis of Creativity , 2007 .

[8]  Mathias Benedek,et al.  Creativity meets neuroscience: experimental tasks for the neuroscientific study of creative thinking. , 2007, Methods.

[9]  K. Davids,et al.  Ecological Validity, Representative Design, and Correspondence Between Experimental Task Constraints and Behavioral Setting: Comment on Rogers, Kadar, and Costall (2005) , 2007 .

[10]  A. Dietrich,et al.  The cognitive neuroscience of creativity , 2004, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[11]  Arne Dietrich,et al.  Neurocognitive mechanisms underlying the experience of flow , 2004, Consciousness and Cognition.

[12]  Jürgen Perl,et al.  PerPot – a meta-model and software tool for analysis and optimisation of load-performance-interaction , 2004 .

[13]  Jürgen Perl,et al.  A neural network approach to movement pattern analysis. , 2004, Human movement science.

[14]  Dean Keith Simonton,et al.  Scientific creativity as constrained stochastic behavior: the integration of product, person, and process perspectives. , 2003, Psychological bulletin.

[15]  D. Sutherland The evolution of clinical gait analysis. Part II kinematics. , 2002, Gait & posture.

[16]  Jürgen Perl,et al.  Game analysis and control by means of continuously learning networks , 2002 .

[17]  J. Fuster Frontal lobe and cognitive development , 2002, Journal of neurocytology.

[18]  S. V. Pakhomov,et al.  Study of the Brain Organization of Creativity: III. Brain Activation Assessed by the Local Cerebral Blood Flow and EEG , 2001, Human Physiology.

[19]  S. Dehaene,et al.  Towards a cognitive neuroscience of consciousness: basic evidence and a workspace framework , 2001, Cognition.

[20]  A. Lane,et al.  Stability of psychometric questionnaires , 2001, Journal of sports sciences.

[21]  J. Duncan,et al.  Common regions of the human frontal lobe recruited by diverse cognitive demands , 2000, Trends in Neurosciences.

[22]  S. V. Pakhomov,et al.  Study of the brain organization of creativity: II. Positron-emission tomography data , 2000, Human Physiology.

[23]  J. Risberg,et al.  On the neurobiology of creativity. Differences in frontal activity between high and low creative subjects , 2000, Neuropsychologia.

[24]  R. Sternberg,et al.  The concept of creativity: Prospects and paradigms. , 1998 .

[25]  J. Plucker,et al.  Handbook of Creativity: Psychometric Approaches to the Study of Human Creativity , 1998 .

[26]  Bernd Fritzke,et al.  A Self-Organizing Network that Can Follow Non-stationary Distributions , 1997, ICANN.

[27]  Joseph Kasof,et al.  Creativity and Breadth of Attention , 1997 .

[28]  Judith E. Rink,et al.  Tactical and Skill Approaches to Teaching Sport and Games: Introduction , 1996 .

[29]  U. Neisser Multiple systems: A new approach to cognitive theory , 1994 .

[30]  G. A. Mendelsohn,et al.  Associative and attentional processes in creative performance1 , 1976 .

[31]  J. Guilford,et al.  The nature of human intelligence. , 1968 .

[32]  S. Mednick The associative basis of the creative process. , 1962, Psychological review.

[33]  H. Plessner,et al.  Intuition in judgment and decision making , 2008 .

[34]  Wlodzislaw Duch Creativity and the Brain , 2007 .

[35]  M. V. Velzen,et al.  Self-organizing maps , 2007 .

[36]  Jürgen Perl,et al.  On a First Attempt to Modelling Creativity Learning by Means of Artificial Neural Networks , 2006, Int. J. Comput. Sci. Sport.

[37]  Jürgen Perl,et al.  Game Intelligence Analysis by Means of a Combination of Variance-Analysis and Neural Networks , 2005, Int. J. Comput. Sci. Sport.

[38]  K. Heilman Creativity and the Brain , 2005 .

[39]  Jürgen Perl,et al.  A Neural Network approach to pattern learning in sport , 2004, International Journal of Computer Science in Sport.

[40]  Vivian V. Valentin,et al.  The effects of positive affect and arousal on working memory and executive attention Neurobiology and computational models , 2002 .

[41]  Pablo Juan Greco,et al.  Amount of incidential incubation as a predictor for expert creative performance of Brazilian and German national team soccer players , 2001 .

[42]  Matthew D. Lieberman,et al.  Intuition: a social cognitive neuroscience approach. , 2000, Psychological bulletin.

[43]  R. Cabeza,et al.  Imaging Cognition II: An Empirical Review of 275 PET and fMRI Studies , 2000, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[44]  Shawn Okuda Sakamoto,et al.  Handbook of Creativity: Experimental Studies of Creativity , 1998 .

[45]  C. Martindale Creativity and connectionism. , 1995 .

[46]  Steven M. Smith,et al.  The creative cognition approach. , 1995 .

[47]  W. Maguire,et al.  The differential effect of noise on creative task performance , 1991 .

[48]  George B. Graen,et al.  Individual problem‐solving styles and attitudes toward divergent thinking before and after training , 1990 .

[49]  D. Hocevar,et al.  A Taxonomy and Critique of Measurements Used in the Study of Creativity , 1989 .

[50]  J. Glover,et al.  Handbook of creativity. , 1989 .