Spatial variability and temporal dynamics analysis of soil erosion due to military land use activities: uncertainty and implications for land management

Human activities, such as military off-road vehicular traffic, disturb ground and vegetation cover of landscapes and increase potential rainfall related runoff and soil erosion. On military lands, soil erosion is of major concern in order to sustain training lands and thus there is a need for land condition maps for planning training activities and land management. In this study, we presented a conditional co-simulation algorithm to generate annual time series maps of soil erosion status from 1989 to 2001 for an army installation. The spatial variability and temporal dynamics of land condition were analyzed. This algorithm modeled soil erosion as realizations of a random function by combining a set of permanent plot data and Landsat Thematic Mapper (TM) images. In addition to estimation maps of soil erosion status, we obtained the maps of uncertainties including the variance of each pixel estimate and the probability of poor land condition. The results and maps are useful tools for land managers and decision-makers to guide military training programs and to generate management plans for sustaining training lands. Copyright © 2007 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

[1]  Jennifer L. Dungan,et al.  Conditional Simulation: An alternative to estimation for achieving mapping objectives , 1999 .

[2]  Guangxing Wang,et al.  Mapping Multiple Variables for Predicting Soil Loss by Geostatistical Methods with TM Images and a Slope Map , 2003 .

[3]  M. Trlica,et al.  Evaluation of a refined surface cover subfactor for use in RUSLE. , 1994 .

[4]  S. Goetz,et al.  Radiometric rectification - Toward a common radiometric response among multidate, multisensor images , 1991 .

[5]  Mark A. Nearing,et al.  Error Assessment in the Universal Soil Loss Equation , 1993 .

[6]  Yvan Pannatier,et al.  Variowin: Software for Spatial Data Analysis in 2D , 1996 .

[7]  P. Woodford,et al.  A Comprehensive Approach to Identifying Monitoring Priorities of Small Landbirds on Military Installations , 2004, Environmental management.

[8]  D. L. Schertz,et al.  The basis for soil loss tolerances , 1983 .

[9]  C. K. Mutchler,et al.  Revised slope steepness factor for the universal soil loss equation , 1987 .

[10]  K. G. Renard,et al.  RUSLE Model Description and Database Sensitivity , 1993 .

[11]  Alan B. Anderson,et al.  Appropriate Plot Size and Spatial Resolution for Mapping Multiple Vegetation Types , 2001 .

[12]  G. R. Foster,et al.  A Runoff Erosivity Factor and Variable Slope Length Exponents for Soil Loss Estimates , 1977 .

[13]  David J. Tazik,et al.  US army land condition-trend analysis (LCTA) program , 1992 .

[14]  Guangxing Wang,et al.  Improvement in mapping vegetation cover factor for the universal soil loss equation by geostatistical methods with Landsat Thematic Mapper images , 2002 .

[15]  Alan B. Anderson,et al.  Assessing and predicting changes in vegetation cover associated with military land use activities using field monitoring data at Fort Hood, Texas , 2005 .

[16]  T. M. Lillesand,et al.  Remote Sensing and Image Interpretation , 1980 .

[17]  Clayton V. Deutsch,et al.  Geostatistical Software Library and User's Guide , 1998 .

[18]  Alan B. Anderson,et al.  Mapping and uncertainty of predictions based on multiple primary variables from joint co-simulation with Landsat TM image and polynomial regression , 2002 .

[19]  Alan B. Anderson,et al.  Mapping vegetation cover change using geostatistical methods and bitemporal Landsat TM images , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[20]  Timothy C. Coburn,et al.  Geostatistics for Natural Resources Evaluation , 2000, Technometrics.