Differences in the microrheology of human embryonic stem cells and human induced pluripotent stem cells.

Embryonic and adult fibroblasts can be returned to pluripotency by the expression of reprogramming genes. Multiple lines of evidence suggest that these human induced pluripotent stem (hiPS) cells and human embryonic stem (hES) cells are behaviorally, karyotypically, and morphologically similar. Here we sought to determine whether the physical properties of hiPS cells, including their micromechanical properties, are different from those of hES cells. To this end, we use the method of particle tracking microrheology to compare the viscoelastic properties of the cytoplasm of hES cells, hiPS cells, and the terminally differentiated parental human fibroblasts from which our hiPS cells are derived. Our results indicate that although the cytoplasm of parental fibroblasts is both viscous and elastic, the cytoplasm of hiPS cells does not exhibit any measurable elasticity and is purely viscous over a wide range of timescales. The viscous phenotype of hiPS cells is recapitulated in parental cells with disassembled actin filament network. The cytoplasm of hES cells is predominantly viscous but contains subcellular regions that are also elastic. This study supports the hypothesis that intracellular elasticity correlates with the degree of cellular differentiation and reveals significant differences in the mechanical properties of hiPS cells and hES cells. Because mechanical stimuli have been shown to mediate the precise fate of differentiating stem cells, our results support the concept that stem cell "softness" is a key feature of force-mediated differentiation of stem cells and suggest there may be subtle functional differences between force-mediated differentiation of hiPS cells and hES cells.

[1]  Brian R. Daniels,et al.  Probing cellular mechanical responses to stimuli using ballistic intracellular nanorheology. , 2007, Methods in cell biology.

[2]  Robert Langer,et al.  Hyaluronic acid hydrogel for controlled self-renewal and differentiation of human embryonic stem cells , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[3]  D. Wirtz,et al.  The Bimodal Role of Filamin in Controlling the Architecture and Mechanics of F-actin Networks* , 2004, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[4]  Kenneth M. Yamada,et al.  Matrix Control of Stem Cell Fate , 2006, Cell.

[5]  S. Sen,et al.  Matrix Elasticity Directs Stem Cell Lineage Specification , 2006, Cell.

[6]  Denis Wirtz,et al.  Particle Tracking Microrheology of Complex Fluids , 1997 .

[7]  S. Yamanaka,et al.  Induction of Pluripotent Stem Cells from Mouse Embryonic and Adult Fibroblast Cultures by Defined Factors , 2006, Cell.

[8]  Denis Wirtz,et al.  Resolving the Role of Actoymyosin Contractility in Cell Microrheology , 2009, PloS one.

[9]  Gordana Vunjak-Novakovic,et al.  The effect of actin disrupting agents on contact guidance of human embryonic stem cells. , 2007, Biomaterials.

[10]  Mason,et al.  Optical measurements of frequency-dependent linear viscoelastic moduli of complex fluids. , 1995, Physical review letters.

[11]  Ning Wang,et al.  Is cell rheology governed by nonequilibrium-to-equilibrium transition of noncovalent bonds? , 2008, Biophysical journal.

[12]  Yiider Tseng,et al.  Intracellular mechanics of migrating fibroblasts. , 2004, Molecular biology of the cell.

[13]  D. Taylor,et al.  Hindered diffusion of inert tracer particles in the cytoplasm of mouse 3T3 cells. , 1987, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[14]  Kheya Sengupta,et al.  Fibroblast adaptation and stiffness matching to soft elastic substrates. , 2007, Biophysical journal.

[15]  R. Stewart,et al.  Induced Pluripotent Stem Cell Lines Derived from Human Somatic Cells , 2007, Science.

[16]  Martin J Aryee,et al.  Differential methylation of tissue- and cancer-specific CpG island shores distinguishes human induced pluripotent stem cells, embryonic stem cells and fibroblasts , 2009, Nature Genetics.

[17]  Yiider Tseng,et al.  Micromechanical mapping of live cells by multiple-particle-tracking microrheology. , 2002, Biophysical journal.

[18]  Denis Wirtz,et al.  Particle-tracking microrheology of living cells: principles and applications. , 2009, Annual review of biophysics.

[19]  D. Wirtz,et al.  Intracellular microrheology as a tool for the measurement of the local mechanical properties of live cells. , 2004, Methods in cell biology.

[20]  Yiider Tseng,et al.  Ballistic intracellular nanorheology reveals ROCK-hard cytoplasmic stiffening response to fluid flow , 2006, Journal of Cell Science.

[21]  Mike J. Mason,et al.  Induced pluripotent stem cells and embryonic stem cells are distinguished by gene expression signatures. , 2009, Cell stem cell.

[22]  Ning Wang,et al.  Cell material property dictates stress-induced spreading and differentiation in embryonic stem cells , 2009, Nature materials.

[23]  P. Mali,et al.  Improved Efficiency and Pace of Generating Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells from Human Adult and Fetal Fibroblasts , 2008, Stem cells.

[24]  S. Strome Fluorescence visualization of the distribution of microfilaments in gonads and early embryos of the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans , 1986, The Journal of cell biology.

[25]  Yiider Tseng,et al.  Rho kinase regulates the intracellular micromechanical response of adherent cells to rho activation. , 2004, Molecular biology of the cell.

[26]  Denis Wirtz,et al.  Probing single-cell micromechanics in vivo: the microrheology of C. elegans developing embryos. , 2006, Biophysical journal.