Bistatic sonars: sea trials, laboratory experiments and future surveys

Bistatic sonars use separate transmitter and receiver(s), optimising the information received from seabed/target(s) scattering. Laboratory experiments are ideal to understand scattering processes and to optimise data collection strategies. They can be full-scale or scaled down. In the latter case, the influence on bistatic scattering processes needs to be carefully weighed, to validate the transition to full-scale experiments. This is particularly relevant as sea trials are expensive, difficult to conduct, and generally impossible to repeat. This article presents the results from: (1) scaled experiments on bare seabed and targets, performed at Bath and other places; (2) full-scale experiments in the GESMA submarine pens during the EC-SITAR project and (3) sea trials from similar experiments in Italy and Sweden. These results are put into the wider context of other international efforts. These three approaches (scaled and full-scale experiments plus sea trials) can be used in synergy. This has important implications for future experiments, the design of surveys and instruments, and analyses of past/future acoustic datasets.

[1]  Andrea Caiti,et al.  Buried Waste in the Seabed: Acoustic Imaging and Bio-toxicity (Results from the European SITAR project) , 2006 .

[2]  Brian H. Houston,et al.  Measurements and analysis of scattering from proud and buried targets in a shallow-water laboratory environment , 1999, Oceans '99. MTS/IEEE. Riding the Crest into the 21st Century. Conference and Exhibition. Conference Proceedings (IEEE Cat. No.99CH37008).

[3]  Buried waste inspection: acoustical images and inversion from multiple-aspect scattering , 2007 .

[4]  H. Schmidt,et al.  Measurements and modeling of acoustic scattering from partially and completely buried spherical shells. , 2002, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[5]  Stuart Anstee Removal of Range-Dependent Artifacts from Sidescan Sonar Imagery , 2001 .

[6]  E. Pouliquen,et al.  Advances in high-resolution seafloor characterization in support of high-frequency underwater acoustics studies: techniques and examples , 2004 .

[7]  Philippe Blondel,et al.  Rapid distinction of dumpsite objects using Multiple‐Aspect Scattering ‐ Results from scaled tank experiments , 2008 .

[8]  P. Blondel,et al.  High-frequency bistatic scattering: comparison of tank and sea experiments , 2001 .

[9]  Philippe Blondel,et al.  Handbook of seafloor sonar imagery , 1997 .

[10]  Philippe Blondel,et al.  High-frequency bistatic scattering experiments using proud and buried targets , 2006 .

[11]  Alessandra Tesei,et al.  A computationally efficient finite element model with perfectly matched layers applied to scattering from axially symmetric objects. , 2007, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[12]  E. Pouliquen,et al.  Time-evolution modeling of seafloor scatter. I. Concept , 1999 .

[13]  Henrik Schmidt,et al.  Subcritical scattering from buried elastic shells. , 2006, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[14]  P. Blondel,et al.  Boundary influences In high frequency, shallow water acoustics , 2005 .

[15]  G. Canepa,et al.  At-sea measurements of acoustic elastic scattering by a 1.5m-long cylinder made of composite materials , 2007 .

[16]  Warren L. J. Fox,et al.  Target parameter estimation using resonance scattering analysis applied to air-filled, cylindrical shells in water , 2000 .

[17]  J. Choi,et al.  240-kHz bistatic bottom scattering measurements in shallow water , 2001 .

[18]  D. Jackson,et al.  Bistatic bottom scattering: Model, experiments, and model/ data comparison , 1998 .