Identifying the variation of experiences when dealing with problems in complex systems

Engineering professional societies, engineering education thought leaders, and academics in engineering education have established the need to promote systems thinking in engineering students so they can deal effectively with the future complexity of engineering practice. Universities and schools have taught systems thinking, but currently there are limitations in measuring the effectiveness of these instructional interventions. Current research on assessment states that it is necessary to align modern theories of learning, the task and the interpretation of the outcomes from the task. Theories about the development of systems thinking are still scarce and are not based in modern theories of learning. This work intends to contribute to closing this gap by identifying the variation of experiences people have when dealing with problems in complex systems. The research approach used to answer this question is phenomenography (Marton's approach). Participants will be asked to perform a task, and each common way of dealing with the task will be identified as a category. These categories will be hierarchically arranged, yielding a developmental path. A developmental path explaining the development of systems thinking will facilitate the development of tools to assess the level of systems thinking which impacts academy and industry.

[1]  Heidi L. Davidz,et al.  Enabling systems thinking to accelerate the development of senior systems engineers , 2008, Syst. Eng..

[2]  Jonas Boustedt,et al.  A methodology for exploring students' experiences and interaction with large-scale software through role-play and phenomenography , 2008, ICER '08.

[3]  Gordon Ellis,et al.  Grand challenges for engineering , 2009, IEEE Engineering Management Review.

[4]  J. S. Small.  Life After School. , 1972 .

[5]  Michael J. Radzicki,et al.  Measuring Change in Mental Models of Dynamic Systems: An Exploratory Study , 1998 .

[6]  F. Capra.  The Web of Life: A New Scientific Understanding of Living Systems , 1996 .

[7]  F. Grabowski,et al.  Simple, complicated and complex systems — the brief introduction , 2008, 2008 Conference on Human System Interactions.

[8]  Steven A. Cavaleri,et al.  Towards evaluation of systems‐thinking interventions: a case study , 1997 .

[9]  John D. Sterman,et al.  Learning in and about complex systems , 1994 .

[10]  Lars Owe Dahlgren,et al.  Applying phenomenography in nursing research. , 2002, Journal of advanced nursing.

[11]  Meriel Huggard,et al.  Object oriented programming and program correctness: the students' perspective , 2006, ICER '06.

[12]  Ann F. McKenna,et al.  Educating Engineers: Designing for the Future of the Field , 2010 .

[13]  Peter Checkland,et al.  Systems Thinking, Systems Practice , 1981 .

[14]  F. Marton,et al.  Learning and Awareness , 1997 .

[15]  Jörgen Sandberg,et al.  Unveiling Professional Development: A Critical Review of Stage Models , 2006 .

[16]  John D. Sterman,et al.  Thinking about systems: student and teacher conceptions of natural and social systems , 2007 .

[17]  Anders Berglund,et al.  Learning computer systems in a distributed project course: The what, why, how and where , 2012 .

[18]  J. Lave,et al.  Understanding Practice: Perspectives on Activity and Context , 1996 .

[19]  Christopher L. Magee,et al.  Complex System Classification , 2004 .

[20]  Krystyna Anne Stave,et al.  Assessing the Effectiveness of Systems Thinking Interventions in the Classroom , 2008 .

[21]  Nancy S. Thompson,et al.  Incorporating Complexity Into Undergraduate Engineering Development Through The Research Communications Studio , 2005 .

[22]  P. Senge.  The fifth discipline : the art and practice of the learning organization/ Peter M. Senge , 1991 .

[23]  William C. Oakes,et al.  A phenomenographic study of the ways of understanding conditional and repetition structures in computer programming languages , 2010 .

[24]  Richard Ashley,et al.  Whole System Design an Integrated Approach to Sustainable Engineering , 2011 .

[25]  Nadia Kellam,et al.  Embracing complexity in engineering education , 2006 .

[26]  Daniel H. Kim.  Introduction to Systems Thinking , 1999 .

[27]  M. Chi.  Three Types of Conceptual Change: Belief Revision, Mental Model Transformation, and Categorical Shift , 2009 .

[28]  J. Duderstadt.  Engineering for a Changing World , 2010 .

[29]  James J. Duderstadt,et al.  Engineering for a Changing World - A Roadmap to the Future of Engineering Practice, Research, and Education (Flexner) , 2008 .

[30]  Charles M. Vest,et al.  Context and Challenge for Twenty‐First Century Engineering Education , 2008 .

[31]  Carla B. Zoltowski,et al.  Students' Ways of Experiencing Human‐Centered Design , 2012 .

[32]  J Swanson,et al.  Business Dynamics—Systems Thinking and Modeling for a Complex World , 2002, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[33]  Ann L. Brown,et al.  How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. , 1999 .

[34]  John D. Bransford,et al.  Levels of processing versus transfer appropriate processing , 1977 .

[35]  Ference Marton,et al.  The Idea of Phenomenography and the Pedagogy of Conceptual Change , 2008 .

[36]  R. Gerber,et al.  Phenomenography: A Qualitative Research Approach for Exploring Understanding in Health Care , 1999, Qualitative health research.

[37]  Jean Lave.  Cognition in Practice: Life after school , 1988 .

[38]  Gloria Dall'Alba,et al.  Using phenomenography to investigate different ways of experiencing sustainable design , 2007 .

[39]  L. Geppert.  Educating the renaissance engineer , 1995 .

[40]  Rod D. Roscoe,et al.  THE PROCESSES AND CHALLENGES OF CONCEPTUAL CHANGE , 2002 .

[41]  James W. Pellegrino,et al.  Knowing What Students Know. , 2003 .

[42]  Michael J. Radzicki,et al.  Measuring Change in Mental Models of Complex Dynamic Systems , 2008 .

[43]  K. Boulding.  General Systems Theory---The Skeleton of Science , 1956 .

[44]  Monica F. Cox,et al.  Defining the Knowledge and Skills that Enable Engineers to Participate in Public Policy , 2012 .

[45]  Ference Marton,et al.  On the unit of description in phenomenography , 2005 .

[46]  Stella Vosniadou,et al.  International handbook of research on conceptual change , 2013 .

[47]  Robin Adams,et al.  Exploring student differences in formulating cross-disciplinary sustainability problems , 2010 .

[48]  M. Pang.  Two Faces of Variation: On continuity in the phenomenographic movement , 2003 .

[49]  Moti Frank,et al.  Assessing the competencies of systems engineers , 2010 .

[50]  John R. Anderson,et al.  Skill Acquisition and the LISP Tutor , 1989, Cogn. Sci..

[51]  John D. Sterman,et al.  Bathtub dynamics: initial results of a systems thinking inventory , 2000 .