Transparent reporting of a multivariable prediction model for individual prognosis or diagnosis (TRIPOD): the TRIPOD Statement

Prediction models are developed to aid health care providers in estimating the probability or risk that a specific disease or condition is present (diagnostic models) or that a specific event will occur in the future (prognostic models), to inform their decision making. However, the overwhelming evidence shows that the quality of reporting of prediction model studies is poor. Only with full and clear reporting of information on all aspects of a prediction model can risk of bias and potential usefulness of prediction models be adequately assessed. The Transparent Reporting of a multivariable prediction model for Individual Prognosis Or Diagnosis (TRIPOD) Initiative developed a set of recommendations for the reporting of studies developing, validating, or updating a prediction model, whether for diagnostic or prognostic purposes. This article describes how the TRIPOD Statement was developed. An extensive list of items based on a review of the literature was created, which was reduced after a Web based survey and revised during a three day meeting in June 2011 with methodologists, health care professionals, and journal editors. The list was refined during several meetings of the steering group and in e-mail discussions with the wider group of TRIPOD contributors. The resulting TRIPOD Statement is a checklist of 22 items, deemed essential for transparent reporting of a prediction model study. The TRIPOD Statement aims to improve the transparency of the reporting of a prediction model study regardless of the study methods used. The TRIPOD Statement is best used in conjunction with the TRIPOD explanation and elaboration document. To aid the editorial process and readers of prediction model studies, it is recommended that authors include a completed checklist in their submission (also available at www.tripod-statement.org). To encourage dissemination of the TRIPOD Statement, this article is freely accessible on the Annals of Internal Medicine Web site (www.annals.org) and will be also published in BJOG, British Journal of Cancer, British Journal of Surgery, BMC Medicine, The BMJ, Circulation, Diabetic Medicine, European Journal of Clinical Investigation, European Urology, and Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. The authors jointly hold the copyright of this article. An accompanying explanation and elaboration article is freely available only on www.annals.org; Annals of Internal Medicine holds copyright for that article.

[1]  S. Madhi,et al.  Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology for Newborn Infection (STROBE-NI): an extension of the STROBE statement for neonatal infection research. , 2016, The Lancet. Infectious diseases.

[2]  Gary S Collins,et al.  Transparent Reporting of a multivariable prediction model for Individual Prognosis Or Diagnosis (TRIPOD): Explanation and Elaboration , 2015, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[3]  G. Collins,et al.  Transparent reporting of a multivariable prediction model for individual prognosis or diagnosis (TRIPOD): The TRIPOD statement , 2015, British Journal of Cancer.

[4]  G. Collins,et al.  Critical Appraisal and Data Extraction for Systematic Reviews of Prediction Modelling Studies: The CHARMS Checklist , 2014, PLoS medicine.

[5]  Jennifer G. Robinson,et al.  2013 ACC/AHA Guideline on the Assessment of Cardiovascular Risk: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines , 2014, Circulation.

[6]  Jennifer G. Robinson,et al.  2013 ACC/AHA Guideline on the Assessment of Cardiovascular Risk: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines , 2014, Circulation.

[7]  G. Collins,et al.  External validation of multivariable prediction models: a systematic review of methodological conduct and reporting , 2014, BMC Medical Research Methodology.

[8]  Gary S Collins,et al.  Conflicts at the heart of the FRAX tool , 2014, Canadian Medical Association Journal.

[9]  Gary S Collins,et al.  A systematic review finds prediction models for chronic kidney disease were poorly reported and often developed using inappropriate methods. , 2013, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[10]  E. Steyerberg,et al.  Prognosis Research Strategy (PROGRESS) 2: Prognostic Factor Research , 2013, PLoS medicine.

[11]  E. Steyerberg,et al.  Prognosis Research Strategy (PROGRESS) 3: Prognostic Model Research , 2013, PLoS medicine.

[12]  N. Tangri,et al.  A systematic review finds prediction models for chronic kidney disease were poorly reported and often developed using inappropriate methods. , 2013, Journal of Clinical Epidemiology.

[13]  Silvia Rabar,et al.  Risk assessment of fragility fractures: summary of NICE guidance , 2012, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[14]  Ewout W Steyerberg,et al.  Developing and evaluating prediction models in rehabilitation populations. , 2012, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[15]  Gary S Collins,et al.  Fracture Risk Assessment: State of the Art, Methodologically Unsound, or Poorly Reported? , 2012, Current Osteoporosis Reports.

[16]  Douglas G Altman,et al.  Reporting recommendations for tumor marker prognostic studies (REMARK): explanation and elaboration , 2012, BMC Medicine.

[17]  Gary S Collins,et al.  Comparing risk prediction models , 2012, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[18]  John P A Ioannidis,et al.  Comparisons of established risk prediction models for cardiovascular disease: systematic review , 2012, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[19]  E. Steyerberg,et al.  Reporting and Methods in Clinical Prediction Research: A Systematic Review , 2012, PLoS medicine.

[20]  M. Woodward,et al.  Risk prediction models: II. External validation, model updating, and impact assessment , 2012, Heart.

[21]  M. Woodward,et al.  Risk prediction models: I. Development, internal validation, and assessing the incremental value of a new (bio)marker , 2012, Heart.

[22]  Hester F. Lingsma,et al.  Assessing the incremental value of diagnostic and prognostic markers: a review and illustration , 2012, European journal of clinical investigation.

[23]  et al.,et al.  Framework for the impact analysis and implementation of Clinical Prediction Rules (CPRs) , 2011, BMC Medical Informatics Decis. Mak..

[24]  Ewout W Steyerberg,et al.  Estimating treatment effects for individual patients based on the results of randomised clinical trials , 2011, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[25]  G. Collins,et al.  Developing risk prediction models for type 2 diabetes: a systematic review of methodology and reporting , 2011, BMC medicine.

[26]  J. Ioannidis,et al.  Use of reclassification for assessment of improved prediction: an empirical evaluation. , 2011, International journal of epidemiology.

[27]  J. Gulcher,et al.  Strengthening the reporting of genetic risk prediction studies (GRIPS): explanation and elaboration , 2011, European Journal of Human Genetics.

[28]  J. Ioannidis,et al.  Strengthening the reporting of genetic risk prediction studies: the GRIPS statement , 2011, Genetics in Medicine.

[29]  Tony Tse,et al.  Registration of observational studies: Is it time? , 2010, Canadian Medical Association Journal.

[30]  A. Nierich,et al.  Prediction Models for Prolonged Intensive Care Unit Stay After Cardiac Surgery: Systematic Review and Validation Study , 2010, Circulation.

[31]  Patrick Royston,et al.  Reporting methods in studies developing prognostic models in cancer: a review , 2010, BMC medicine.

[32]  D. Moher,et al.  Guidance for Developers of Health Research Reporting Guidelines , 2010, PLoS medicine.

[33]  D. Moher,et al.  Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. , 2010, International journal of surgery.

[34]  Richard D Riley,et al.  Ten steps towards improving prognosis research , 2009, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[35]  C.J.H. Mann,et al.  Clinical Prediction Models: A Practical Approach to Development, Validation and Updating , 2009 .

[36]  P. Royston,et al.  Prognosis and prognostic research: application and impact of prognostic models in clinical practice , 2009, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[37]  Yvonne Vergouwe,et al.  Prognosis and prognostic research: validating a prognostic model , 2009, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[38]  Yvonne Vergouwe,et al.  Prognosis and prognostic research: Developing a prognostic model , 2009, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[39]  Yvonne Vergouwe,et al.  Prognosis and prognostic research: what, why, and how? , 2009, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[40]  J. Ioannidis,et al.  STrengthening the REporting of Genetic Association Studies (STREGA)— An Extension of the STROBE Statement , 2009, PLoS medicine.

[41]  D. Moher,et al.  Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. , 2009, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[42]  E. Steyerberg Clinical Prediction Models , 2008, Statistics for Biology and Health.

[43]  Douglas G Altman,et al.  [The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology [STROBE] statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies]. , 2007, Gaceta sanitaria.

[44]  S. Pocock,et al.  Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): Explanation and Elaboration , 2007, Epidemiology.

[45]  S. Pocock,et al.  The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. , 2007, Preventive medicine.

[46]  S. Pocock,et al.  Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): Explanation and Elaboration , 2007, PLoS medicine.

[47]  S. Goodman,et al.  Reproducible Research: Moving toward Research the Public Can Really Trust , 2007, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[48]  David M Kent,et al.  Multivariable risk prediction can greatly enhance the statistical power of clinical trial subgroup analysis , 2006, BMC medical research methodology.

[49]  A. Evans,et al.  Translating Clinical Research into Clinical Practice: Impact of Using Prediction Rules To Make Decisions , 2006, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[50]  W. Sauerbrei,et al.  Reporting recommendations for tumor marker prognostic studies (REMARK). , 2005, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[51]  I. Ellis,et al.  The Nottingham prognostic index in primary breast cancer , 2005, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.

[52]  Ewout W Steyerberg,et al.  Internal and external validation of predictive models: a simulation study of bias and precision in small samples. , 2003, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[53]  C. Gatsonis,et al.  Towards Complete and Accurate Reporting of Studies of Diagnostic Accuracy: The STARD Initiative , 2003, Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine.

[54]  D. Rennie,et al.  Towards complete and accurate reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy: the STARD initiative , 2003, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[55]  Brian H. Rowe,et al.  Canadian C-Spine Rule study for alert and stable trauma patients: II. Study objectives and methodology. , 2002, CJEM.

[56]  Brian H. Rowe,et al.  Canadian C-Spine Rule study for alert and stable trauma patients: I. Background and rationale. , 2002, CJEM.

[57]  J. Habbema,et al.  Internal validation of predictive models: efficiency of some procedures for logistic regression analysis. , 2001, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[58]  Ewout W. Steyerberg,et al.  Application of Shrinkage Techniques in Logistic Regression Analysis: A Case Study , 2001 .

[59]  S. Lemeshow,et al.  European system for cardiac operative risk evaluation (EuroSCORE). , 1999, European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery.

[60]  K. Covinsky,et al.  Assessing the Generalizability of Prognostic Information , 1999, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[61]  S. Nashef,et al.  Eurp-pean system for cardiac operative risk evaluation (Euro SCORE) , 1999 .

[62]  A. Laupacis,et al.  Clinical prediction rules. A review and suggested modifications of methodological standards. , 1997, JAMA.

[63]  Diagnostic prediction rules: principles, requirements and pitfalls. , 1995 .

[64]  J. Knottnerus Diagnostic prediction rules: principles, requirements and pitfalls. , 1995, Primary care.

[65]  I. Stiell,et al.  A study to develop clinical decision rules for the use of radiography in acute ankle injuries. , 1992, Annals of emergency medicine.

[66]  K. Anderson,et al.  Cardiovascular disease risk profiles. , 1991, American heart journal.

[67]  J. L. Gall,et al.  A simplified acute physiology score for ICU patients , 1984, Critical care medicine.

[68]  R. Blamey,et al.  A prognostic index in primary breast cancer. , 1982, British Journal of Cancer.