Short-Run Learning Dynamics Under a Test-Based Accountability System: Evidence from Pakistan

Low student learning is a common finding in much of the developing world. This paper uses a relatively unique dataset of five semiannual rounds of standardized test data to characterize and explain the short-term changes in student learning. The data are collected as part of the quality assurance system for a public-private partnership program that offers public subsidies conditional on minimum learning levels to low-cost private schools in Pakistan. Apart from a large positive distributional shift in learning between the first two test rounds, the learning distributions over test rounds show little progress. Schools are ejected from the program if they fail to achieve a minimum pass rate in the test in two consecutive attempts, making the test high stakes. Sharp regression discontinuity estimates show that the threat of program exit on schools that barely failed the test for the first time induces large learning gains. The large change in learning between the first two test rounds is likely attributable to this accountability pressure given that a large share of new program entrants failed in the first test round. Schools also qualify for substantial annual teacher bonuses if they achieve a minimum score in a composite measure of student test participation and mean test score. Sharp regression discontinuity estimates do not show that the prospect of future teacher bonus rewards induces learning gains for schools that barely did not qualify for the bonus.

[1]  V. Gauri,et al.  Vouchers for Basic Education in Developing Countries: A Principal-Agent Perspective , 2003 .

[2]  Thomas J. Kane,et al.  The Promise and Pitfalls of Using Imprecise School Accountability Measures , 2002 .

[3]  Victor Lavy Evaluating the Effect of Teachers' Performance Incentives on Pupil Achievement , 2001 .

[4]  T. Vishwanath,et al.  Pakistan - Learning and Educational Achievements in Punjab Schools (LEAPS) : insights to inform the education policy debate , 2008 .

[5]  B. Bloom,et al.  Taxonomy of Educational Objectives. Handbook I: Cognitive Domain , 1966 .

[6]  J. Porter Asymptotic Bias and Optimal Convergence Rates for Semiparametric Kernel Estimators in the Regression Discontinuity Model , 2002 .

[7]  K. Chay,et al.  The Central Role of Noise in Evaluating Interventions that Use Test Scores to Rank Schools , 2003 .

[8]  Mark E. Schaffer,et al.  XTOVERID: Stata module to calculate tests of overidentifying restrictions after xtreg, xtivreg, xtivreg2, xthtaylor , 2006 .

[9]  Tristan Zajonc,et al.  Do Value-Added Estimates Add Value? Accounting for Learning Dynamics , 2009 .

[10]  Cecilia Elena Rouse,et al.  Do Accountability and Voucher Threats Improve Low-Performing Schools? , 2005 .

[11]  Jianqing Fan,et al.  On automatic boundary corrections , 1997 .

[12]  William M. K. Trochim,et al.  Research Design for Program Evaluation: The Regression-Discontinuity Approach , 1984 .

[13]  R. Davidson,et al.  Testing for Restricted Stochastic Dominance , 2006 .

[14]  A. Khwaja,et al.  A Dime a Day: The Possibilities and Limits of Private Schooling in Pakistan , 2006, Comparative Education Review.

[15]  Findings from the Bhutan learning quality survey , 2009 .

[16]  P. Glewwe,et al.  Schools, Teachers, and Education Outcomes in Developing Countries Second Draft of Chapter for Handbook on the Economics of Education , 2005 .

[17]  P. Glewwe,et al.  Teacher Incentives in the Developing World , 2009 .

[18]  E. Hanushek,et al.  The Role of Education Quality for Economic Growth , 2007 .

[19]  David N. Figlio,et al.  Feeling the Florida Heat? How Low-Performing Schools Respond to Voucher and Accountability Pressure , 2007 .

[20]  Hanley S. Chiang How Accountability Pressure on Failing Schools Affects Student Achievement , 2009 .

[21]  Jonah E. Rockoff,et al.  Short Run Impacts of Accountability on School Quality , 2008 .

[22]  Brian A. Jacob Test-Based Accountability and Student Achievement: An Investigation of Differential Performance on Naep and State Assessments , 2007 .

[23]  Justin McCrary,et al.  Manipulation of the Running Variable in the Regression Discontinuity Design: A Density Test , 2007 .

[24]  Hafiz A. Pasha Social development in Pakistan : annual review , 1999 .

[25]  Wilbert Van Der Klaauw,et al.  Regression-Discontinuity Analysis , 2010 .

[26]  India. Parliament. Lok Sabha. Secretariat National education policy , 1985 .

[27]  D. Campbell,et al.  Regression-Discontinuity Analysis: An Alternative to the Ex-Post Facto Experiment , 1960 .

[28]  Jeffrey M. Woodbridge Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data , 2002 .

[29]  Russell Davidson,et al.  Testing for Restricted Stochastic Dominance: Some Further Results , 2009, Review of Economic Analysis.

[30]  Martin R. West,et al.  The Efficacy of Choice Threats within School Accountability Systems: Results from Legislatively Induced Experiments , 2005 .

[31]  J. Hahn,et al.  IDENTIFICATION AND ESTIMATION OF TREATMENT EFFECTS WITH A REGRESSION-DISCONTINUITY DESIGN , 2001 .

[32]  Felipe Barrera-Osorio,et al.  Evaluating Public Per-Student Subsidies to Low-Cost Private Schools: Regression-Discontinuity Evidence from Pakistan , 2011 .

[33]  Victor Lavy Performance Pay and Teachers' Effort, Productivity and Grading Ethics , 2004 .

[34]  Priyanka Pandey,et al.  Learning Levels and Gaps in Pakistan , 2006 .

[35]  H. Müller,et al.  Local Polynomial Modeling and Its Applications , 1998 .