Abinitio calculation of reaction energies. III. Basis set dependence of relative energies on the FH2 and H2CO potential energy surfaces

The relative energies of the stationary points on the FH2 and H2CO nuclear potential energy surfaces relevant to the hydrogen atom abstraction, H2 elimination and 1,2‐hydrogen shift reactions have been examined using fourth‐order Mo/ller–Plesset perturbation theory and a variety of basis sets. The theoretical absolute zero activation energy for the F+H2→FH+H reaction is in better agreement with experiment than previous theoretical studies, and part of the disagreement between earlier theoretical calculations and experiment is found to result from the use of assumed rather than calculated zero‐point vibrational energies. The fourth‐order reaction energy for the elimination of hydrogen from formaldehyde is within 2 kcal mol−1 of the experimental value using the largest basis set considered. The qualitative features of the H2CO surface are unchanged by expansion of the basis set beyond the polarized triple‐zeta level, but diffuse functions and several sets of polarization functions are found to be necessary ...

[1]  Michael J. Frisch,et al.  Self‐consistent molecular orbital methods 25. Supplementary functions for Gaussian basis sets , 1984 .

[2]  W. A. Lester,et al.  Formaldehyde: Abinitio MCSCF+CI transition state for H2CO → CO+H2 on the S0 surface , 1983 .

[3]  M. Frisch,et al.  Basis set dependence of correlation corrections to protonation energies , 1981 .

[4]  Henry F. Schaefer,et al.  Features of the H2CO potential energy hypersurface pertinent to formaldehyde photodissociation , 1981 .

[5]  Michael J. Frisch,et al.  The lowest singlet potential surface of formaldehyde , 1981 .

[6]  J. Pople,et al.  Moeller-Plesset study of the H4CO potential energy surface , 1980 .

[7]  Michael J. Frisch,et al.  Contribution of triple substitutions to the electron correlation energy in fourth order perturbation theory , 1980 .

[8]  Jonathan E. Clark,et al.  HCO production, vibrational relaxation, chemical kinetics, and spectroscopy following laser photolysis of formaldehyde , 1978 .

[9]  N. S. Nogar,et al.  The photochemistry of formaldehyde: Absolute quantum yields, radical reactions, and NO reactions , 1978 .

[10]  P. Houston,et al.  Formaldehyde photochemistry: Appearance rate, vibrational relaxation, and energy distribution of the CO product , 1976 .

[11]  J. Duncan,et al.  The general harmonic force field of formaldehyde , 1973 .

[12]  P. C. Hariharan,et al.  The influence of polarization functions on molecular orbital hydrogenation energies , 1973 .

[13]  R. Raffenetti,et al.  General contraction of Gaussian atomic orbitals: Core, valence, polarization, and diffuse basis sets; Molecular integral evaluation , 1973 .

[14]  T. H. Dunning Gaussian Basis Functions for Use in Molecular Calculations. III. Contraction of (10s6p) Atomic Basis Sets for the First‐Row Atoms , 1970 .

[15]  M. Plesset,et al.  Note on an Approximation Treatment for Many-Electron Systems , 1934 .

[16]  J. Pople,et al.  Self‐consistent molecular orbital methods. XX. A basis set for correlated wave functions , 1980 .

[17]  Mark S. Gordon,et al.  Self-consistent molecular-orbital methods. 22. Small split-valence basis sets for second-row elements , 1980 .

[18]  G. Herzberg,et al.  Constants of diatomic molecules , 1979 .

[19]  R. Bechmann,et al.  Numerical data and functional relationships in science and technology , 1969 .