The Effectiveness of Dental Protection and the Material Arrangement in Custom-Made Mouthguards

Experimental research studies have shown that wearing a mouthguard (MG) is an effective way to prevent tooth or maxillofacial trauma. However, there is a lack of scientific information regarding how the material arrangement within the mouthguard can modify its mechanical response during an impact. Hence, this study aimed to evaluate the influence of material arrangement within custom-made mouthguards on stress transmitted to anterior teeth, bone, and soft tissue after impact. Four 3D finite element models of a human maxilla were reconstructed based on the CBCT of a young patient and analyzed according to the presence or absence of a mouthguard and the type of material arrangement within those with a mouthguard: model NMG with no mouthguard; model CMG representing the conventional arrangement with a single 4 mm-thick ethylene-vinyl acetate (EVA) foil; model FMG presenting layer arrangement with two 1 mm-thick foils of EVA in the outer shell and one 2 mm-thick foil of EVA foam in the core; model HMG presenting a 1 mm-thick compact inner and outer shell of EVA and a 2 mm wide air-filled zone in the core. Linear quasi-static analysis and frontal load were used to simulate an impact with an energy of 4.4 J. Isotropic linear elastic properties were assumed for the bone and teeth but not for the mouthguard protection and oral soft tissues. The results were evaluated and compared in terms of displacement, stretches, and stresses. All the mouthguards analyzed reduced the risk of injury to teeth and bone, reducing the displacement and stress of these structures. However, the implementation of a honeycomb structured layer allowed more significant displacement and deformation of the mouthguard’s external layer, thus promoting higher protection of the anatomic structures, namely the root dentin and the bone tissue. Nevertheless, the results also indicate that improving the mouthguard flexibility might increase the soft tissue injuries.

[1]  M. A. Neto,et al.  Impact response of different materials for sports mouthguards , 2021, Frattura ed Integrità Strutturale.

[2]  M. A. Neto,et al.  Influence of Cavity Geometry on the Fracture Strength of Dental Restorations: Finite Element Study , 2021, Applied Sciences.

[3]  L. Giannetti,et al.  Sport and Dental Traumatology: Surgical Solutions and Prevention , 2021, Dentistry journal.

[4]  Maria Augusta Neto,et al.  Mechanical Evaluation of Implant-Assisted Removable Partial Dentures in Kennedy Class I Patients: Finite Element Design Considerations , 2021, Applied Sciences.

[5]  João Paulo Mendes Tribst,et al.  Biomechanical Analysis of a Custom-Made Mouthguard Reinforced With Different Elastic Modulus Laminates During a Simulated Maxillofacial Trauma , 2020, Craniomaxillofacial trauma & reconstruction.

[6]  João Paulo Mendes Tribst,et al.  Mouthguard Use Effect on the Biomechanical Response of an Ankylosed Maxillary Central Incisor during a Traumatic Impact: A 3-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis , 2020, Life.

[7]  João Paulo Mendes Tribst,et al.  Mouthguard use and TMJ injury prevention with different occlusions: A three-dimensional finite element analysis. , 2020, Dental traumatology : official publication of International Association for Dental Traumatology.

[8]  J. Andreasen,et al.  Risk of ankylosis of 400 avulsed and replanted human teeth in relation to length of dry storage. A re-evaluation of a long-term clinical study. , 2020, Dental traumatology : official publication of International Association for Dental Traumatology.

[9]  M. R. Khosravani,et al.  Mechanical behavior of restorative dental composites under various loading conditions. , 2019, Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials.

[10]  Man Ting Kwong,et al.  Mechanical Safety of Embedded Electronics for In-body Wearables: A Smart Mouthguard Study , 2019, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[11]  João Paulo Mendes Tribst,et al.  Simulation of mouthguard use in preventing dental injuries caused by different impacts in sports activities , 2018, Sport Sciences for Health.

[12]  Xuechao Yang,et al.  Biomechanical Properties of First Maxillary Molars with Different Endodontic Cavities: A Finite Element Analysis , 2018, Journal of endodontics.

[13]  Eric Habib,et al.  Evaluation of the filler packing structures in dental resin composites: From theory to practice. , 2018, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[14]  A. Versluis,et al.  Mouthguard Biomechanics for Protecting Dental Implants from Impact: Experimental and Finite Element Impact Analysis. , 2018, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.

[15]  M. A. Neto,et al.  Effect of round curvature of anterior implant-supported zirconia frameworks: finite element analysis and in vitro study using digital image correlation , 2017, Computer methods in biomechanics and biomedical engineering.

[16]  James I. J. Green,et al.  The Role of Mouthguards in Preventing and Reducing Sports-Related Trauma , 2017, Primary dental journal.

[17]  H. Chun,et al.  Influence of Dentoalveolar Ankylosis on the Biomechanical Response of a Single-rooted Tooth and Surrounding Alveolar Bone: A 3-dimensional Finite Element Analysis. , 2016, Journal of endodontics.

[18]  P. Noritomi,et al.  A three-dimensional finite element analysis of the sports mouthguard. , 2016, Dental traumatology : official publication of International Association for Dental Traumatology.

[19]  A. Versluis,et al.  Custom-Fitted EVA Mouthguards: what is the ideal thickness? a dynamic finite element impact study. , 2016, Dental traumatology : official publication of International Association for Dental Traumatology.

[20]  T. Takeda,et al.  Shock absorption ability of mouthguard against forceful, traumatic mandibular closure. , 2014, Dental traumatology : official publication of International Association for Dental Traumatology.

[21]  Wen Du,et al.  Review of research on the mechanical properties of the human tooth , 2014, International Journal of Oral Science.

[22]  Guillaume Odin,et al.  Determination of Young's modulus of mandibular bone using inverse analysis. , 2010, Medical engineering & physics.

[23]  Joseph J. Knapik,et al.  Mouthguards in Sport Activities History, Physical Properties and Injury Prevention Effectiveness , 2007, Sports medicine.

[24]  Jill Peterson,et al.  Material properties of the dentate maxilla. , 2006, The anatomical record. Part A, Discoveries in molecular, cellular, and evolutionary biology.

[25]  Tomotaka Takeda,et al.  Does hard insertion and space improve shock absorption ability of mouthguard? , 2006, Dental traumatology : official publication of International Association for Dental Traumatology.

[26]  Kawamura Shintaro,et al.  The influence of impact object characteristics on impact force and force absorption by mouthguard material. , 2004, Dental traumatology : official publication of International Association for Dental Traumatology.

[27]  P. Dechow,et al.  Variations in cortical material properties throughout the human dentate mandible. , 2003, American journal of physical anthropology.

[28]  P. Dechow,et al.  Edentulation Alters Material Properties of Cortical Bone in the Human Mandible , 2002, Journal of dental research.

[29]  Iain R Spears,et al.  The effect of mouthguard design on stresses in the tooth-bone complex. , 2002, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[30]  J. Eccleston,et al.  EVA mouthguards: how thick should they be? , 2002, Dental traumatology : official publication of International Association for Dental Traumatology.

[31]  J A Eccleston,et al.  Beneficial effects of air inclusions on the performance of ethylene vinyl acetate (EVA) mouthguard material , 2002, British journal of sports medicine.

[32]  J. Eccleston,et al.  The effect on energy absorption of hard inserts in laminated EVA mouthguards. , 2000, Australian dental journal.