The quantitative study of shape and pattern perception.

The pre-eminent importance of formal or relational factors in perception has been abundantly demonstrated during some forty years of gestalt psychology. It seems extraordinary, therefore, that so little progress has been made (and, indeed, that so little effort has been expended) toward the systematizing and quantifying of such factors. Our most precise knowledge of perception is in those areas which have yielded to psychophysical analysis (e.g., the perception of size, color, and pitch), but there is virtually no psychophysics of shape or pattern. Several difficulties may be pointed out at once: (a) Shape is a multidimensional variable, though it is often carelessly referred to as a "dimension," along with brightness, hue, area, and the like, (b) The number of dimensions necessary to describe a shape is not fixed or constant, but increases with the complexity of the shape, (c) Even if we know how many dimensions are necessary in a given case, the choice of particular descriptive terms (i.e., of referenceaxes in the multidimensional space with which we are dealing) remains a problem; presumably some such terms have more psychological meaningfulness than others.

[1]  D'arcy W. Thompson,et al.  On Growth and Form , 1917, Nature.

[2]  E. Fehrer An Investigation of the Learning of Visually Perceived Forms , 1935 .

[3]  A. Householder Concerning Rashevsky's theory of the “Gestalt” , 1939 .

[4]  W. Pitts,et al.  How we know universals; the perception of auditory and visual forms. , 1947, The Bulletin of mathematical biophysics.

[5]  E. L. Kaufman,et al.  The discrimination of visual number. , 1949, The American journal of psychology.

[6]  E. Brunswik Systematic and Representative Design of Psychological Experiments. With Results in Physical and Social Perception , 1949 .

[7]  E. Brunswik,et al.  The Conceptual Framework of Psychology , 1954 .

[8]  R. S. French The discrimination of dot patterns as a function of number and average separation of dots. , 1953, Journal of Experimental Psychology.

[9]  L S Kovasznay,et al.  Processing of Two-Dimensional Patterns by Scanning Techniques. , 1953, Science.

[10]  E. Brunswik,et al.  Ecological cue-validity of proximity and of other Gestalt factors. , 1953, The American journal of psychology.

[11]  E. T. Klemmer,et al.  Assimilation of information from dot and matrix patterns. , 1952, Journal of experimental psychology.

[12]  R. A. Duryea,et al.  Threshold for visual form: further experiments. , 1954, The American journal of psychology.

[13]  F. Attneave Some informational aspects of visual perception. , 1954, Psychological review.

[14]  M. Bitterman,et al.  Threshold for visual form: a diffusion model. , 1954, The American journal of psychology.

[15]  F. Attneave Symmetry, information, and memory for patterns. , 1955, The American journal of psychology.

[16]  J. Deutsch A theory of shape recognition. , 1955, British journal of psychology.

[17]  G. P. Dinneen Programming pattern recognition , 1955, AFIPS '55 (Western).

[18]  J. A. Leonard,et al.  Stimulus correlates of visual pattern recognition: a probability approach. , 1956, Journal of experimental psychology.

[19]  F. Attneave Physical determinants of the judged complexity of shapes. , 1957, Journal of experimental psychology.