A Rhetorical Typology for Studying the Audience Role in Public Relations Communication: The Avon 3‐Day Disruption as Exemplar

This study develops public relations theory using Aristotelian theory as a foundation and contemporary rhetorical and public relations scholarship to build a framework from which to extend the rhetorical public relations paradigm. This approach adds depth to rhetorically framed public relations theory and offers practical application for public relations scholarship. The article provides an example of how public relations researchers can apply the proposed rhetorical typology to better include the public, thus more fully understanding the audience role in communication relationships. A qualitative analysis of the online dialogue among Avon Breast Cancer 3-Day Walk participants during a time of uncertainty serves as an exemplar for the proposed use of rhetorical theory in public relations research. The key difference in the approach proposed here is the emphasis on the public as partners in the public relations dialogue who help shape rhetorical discourse. In contrast to the organization-centered approach, the public-centered tactic exposes the links as well as the disconnects between organization and public values, underscoring the importance for practitioners to provide meaningful contributions to the public–organization dialogue, creating, negotiating, and codefining meaning with publics.

[1]  Richard E. Crable,et al.  Mobil's epideictic advocacy: “Observations” of Prometheus‐bound , 1983 .

[2]  William L. Benoit,et al.  Rhetorical theory as message reception: A cognitive response approach to rhetorical theory and criticism , 2003 .

[3]  D. W. Augustine,et al.  On Christian Doctrine , 1958 .

[4]  K. Burke A Rhetoric of Motives , 1969 .

[5]  C. Condit The functions of epideictic: The Boston massacre orations as exemplar , 1985 .

[6]  T. Farrell Knowledge, consensus, and rhetorical theory , 1976 .

[7]  S. Rampton,et al.  Toxic Sludge is Good For You: Lies, Damn Lies and the Public Relations Industry , 2002 .

[8]  Ch. Perelman,et al.  The New Rhetoric and the Humanities: Essays on Rhetoric and its Applications , 1979 .

[9]  J. Grunig Two-Way Symmetrical Public Relations: Past, Present, and Future , 2001 .

[10]  Linda Hon,et al.  Feminist Values in Public Relations , 2000 .

[11]  R. Heath A Rhetorical Perspective on the Values of Public Relations: Crossroads and Pathways Toward Concurrence , 2000 .

[12]  Jeffrey K. Springston Public Relations and New Media Technology: The Impact of the Internet , 2001 .

[13]  Robert L. Heath,et al.  A Rhetorical Enactment Rationale for Public Relations: The Good Organization Communicating Well , 2001 .

[14]  James W. Tankard,et al.  The spin doctor: An alternative model of public relations , 1994 .

[15]  A. Kasper A feminist, qualitative methodology: A study of women with breast cancer , 1994 .

[16]  Casey Sweet,et al.  Designing and conducting virtual focus groups , 2001 .

[17]  L. Bitzer The Rhetorical Situation. , 1968 .

[18]  T. Farrell Norms of Rhetorical Culture , 1993 .

[19]  J. Grunig,et al.  Managing public relations , 1984 .

[20]  W. Elwood Public Relations Inquiry as Rhetorical Criticism: Case Studies of Corporate Discourse and Social Influence , 1995 .

[21]  Carl H. Botan,et al.  Public relations: State of the field , 2004 .

[22]  James E. Grunig,et al.  Public Relations Research Annual , 2020 .

[23]  R. Heath,et al.  Handbook of public relations , 2001 .

[24]  Derina R. Holtzhausen Postmodern Values in Public Relations , 2000 .

[25]  George Cheney,et al.  Rhetoric in an organizational society : managing multiple identities , 1992 .

[26]  Aristotle,et al.  On rhetoric : a theory of civic discourse , 1993 .

[27]  R. Heath A rhetorical approach to zones of meaning and organizational prerogatives , 1993 .