Effectiveness of using tuned-mass dampers in reducing seismic risk

Strong earthquakes cause tangible and intangible seismic losses and disrupt service and function of buildings and infrastructure. The losses could be mitigated by increasing seismic design levels or by installing additional energy dissipation devices, such as tuned-mass dampers (TMDs). Although TMDs are useful for reducing structural responses, their effectiveness in terms of the expected lifecycle cost of buildings including the cost of TMDs, is rarely discussed. A parametric study on the expected lifecycle cost of a building with TMDs is carried out using a two-degree-of-freedom system whose non-linear hysteretic behaviour of the main structure is represented by the Bouc-Wen model. Probabilistic models of seismic demand to structures with TMDs are developed by using 381 ground motion records. The models are employed to assess the expected lifecycle cost of structures with TMDs and to investigate the effectiveness of TMDs in reducing seismic risk. The results indicate that the effectiveness of TMDs decreases as the seismic excitation level increases and its use on occasion could worsen structural performance against earthquake loading. The reduction in the expected damage cost in terms of the initial construction cost by installing TMDs is limited.

[1]  Fahim Sadek,et al.  A METHOD OF ESTIMATING THE PARAMETERS OF TUNED MASS DAMPERS FOR SEISMIC APPLICATIONS , 1997 .

[2]  Sonia E. Ruiz,et al.  Seismic Failure Rates of Multistory Frames , 1989 .

[3]  T. T. Soong,et al.  Parametric study and simplified design of tuned mass dampers , 1998 .

[4]  Greg Foliente,et al.  Hysteresis Modeling of Wood Joints and Structural Systems , 1995 .

[5]  Robert Tremblay,et al.  Seismic force modification factors for the proposed 2005 edition of the National Building Code of Canada , 2003 .

[6]  Bruce Ellingwood,et al.  Development of a probability based load criterion for American National Standard A58 , 1980 .

[7]  Lawrence F. Shampine,et al.  The MATLAB ODE Suite , 1997, SIAM J. Sci. Comput..

[8]  H. Zhang,et al.  Parameter Analysis of the Differential Model of Hysteresis , 2004 .

[9]  G. B. Warburton,et al.  Optimum absorber parameters for various combinations of response and excitation parameters , 1982 .

[10]  Haijun Zhang,et al.  Particle swarm optimization of TMD by non‐stationary base excitation during earthquake , 2008 .

[11]  Takeru Igusa,et al.  Vibration Control Using Multiple Tuned Mass Dampers , 1994 .

[12]  Sonia E. Ruiz,et al.  Influence of ground motion intensity on the effectiveness of tuned mass dampers , 1999 .

[13]  Katsu Goda,et al.  Optimal seismic design for limited planning time horizon with detailed seismic hazard information , 2006 .

[14]  Tospol Pinkaew,et al.  Seismic effectiveness of tuned mass dampers for damage reduction of structures , 2003 .

[15]  Y. Fujino,et al.  Dynamic characterization of multiple tuned mass dampers and some design formulas , 1994 .

[16]  Y. Wen Method for Random Vibration of Hysteretic Systems , 1976 .

[17]  Katsu Goda,et al.  Probabilistic Characteristics of Seismic Ductility Demand of SDOF Systems with Bouc-Wen Hysteretic Behavior , 2009 .