New digital confocal laser microscopy may boost real-time evaluation of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle biopsy (EUS-FNB) from solid pancreatic lesions: Data from an international multicenter study

[1]  M. Konstantinidis,et al.  An Empirical Comparative Assessment of Inter-Rater Agreement of Binary Outcomes and Multiple Raters , 2022, Symmetry.

[2]  K. Sievert,et al.  Ex Vivo Fluorescence Confocal Microscopy in Specimens of the Liver: A Proof-of-Concept Study , 2022, Cancers.

[3]  S. Krishnamurthy,et al.  Feasibility of using digital confocal microscopy for cytopathological examination in clinical practice , 2021, Modern Pathology.

[4]  Hassan Cesare,et al.  Role of fluorescence confocal microscopy for rapid evaluation of EUS fine-needle biopsy in pancreatic solid lesions. , 2021, Gastrointestinal endoscopy.

[5]  R. Montironi,et al.  Current and future perspectives of digital microscopy with fluorescence confocal microscope for prostate tissue interpretation: a narrative review , 2021, Translational andrology and urology.

[6]  C. Longo,et al.  An intraoperative study with ex vivo fluorescence confocal microscopy: diagnostic accuracy of the three visualization modalities , 2020, Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology : JEADV.

[7]  T. Ohyama.  Statistical inference of agreement coefficient between two raters with binary outcomes , 2020, Communications in Statistics - Theory and Methods.

[8]  J. Malvehy,et al.  Ex vivo confocal microscopy: revolution in fast pathology in dermatology , 2020, The British journal of dermatology.

[9]  S. Krishnamurthy,et al.  Comparison of Real-Time Fluorescence Confocal Digital Microscopy With Hematoxylin-Eosin–Stained Sections of Core-Needle Biopsy Specimens , 2020, JAMA network open.

[10]  R. Montironi,et al.  Real‐time assessment of surgical margins during radical prostatectomy: a novel approach that uses fluorescence confocal microscopy for the evaluation of peri‐prostatic soft tissue , 2020, BJU international.

[11]  C. Longo,et al.  Ex vivo fluorescence confocal microscopy: the first application for real‐time pathological examination of prostatic tissue , 2019, BJU international.

[12]  R. Pampena,et al.  Diagnostic accuracy of ex vivo fluorescence confocal microscopy in Mohs surgery of basal cell carcinomas: a prospective study on 753 margins , 2019, The British journal of dermatology.

[13]  M. Pitman,et al.  Risk of malignancy in the categories of the Papanicolaou Society of Cytopathology system for reporting pancreaticobiliary cytology. , 2019, Journal of the American Society of Cytopathology.

[14]  Thomas J. Fuchs,et al.  Whole slide imaging equivalency and efficiency study: experience at a large academic center , 2019, Modern Pathology.

[15]  Prashanth Rawla,et al.  Epidemiology of Pancreatic Cancer: Global Trends, Etiology and Risk Factors , 2019, World journal of oncology.

[16]  A. Jemal,et al.  Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries , 2018, CA: a cancer journal for clinicians.

[17]  N. Thosani,et al.  A multicenter evaluation of a new EUS core biopsy needle: Experience in 200 patients , 2018, Endoscopic ultrasound.

[18]  M. Wallace,et al.  Advanced EUS Guided Tissue Acquisition Methods for Pancreatic Cancer , 2018, Cancers.

[19]  N. Fukami,et al.  Interobserver agreement among cytopathologists in the evaluation of pancreatic endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration cytology specimens* , 2016, Endoscopy International Open.

[20]  Shuwen Liang,et al.  Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle core biopsy for the diagnosis of pancreatic malignant lesions: a systematic review and Meta-Analysis , 2016, Scientific Reports.

[21]  M. Zakowski,et al.  Low interobserver agreement in cytology grading of mucinous pancreatic neoplasms , 2015, Cancer cytopathology.

[22]  K. Gwet.  Handbook of Inter-Rater Reliability: The Definitive Guide to Measuring the Extent of Agreement Among Raters , 2014 .

[23]  M. Mino‐Kenudson,et al.  Standardized terminology and nomenclature for pancreatobiliary cytology: The Papanicolaou Society of Cytopathology guidelines , 2014, Diagnostic cytopathology.

[24]  Faris M. Murad,et al.  Rapid on‐site evaluation for endoscopic ultrasound‐guided fine‐needle biopsy of the pancreas decreases the incidence of repeat biopsy procedures , 2013, Cancer cytopathology.

[25]  K. Gwet,et al.  A comparison of Cohen’s Kappa and Gwet’s AC1 when calculating inter-rater reliability coefficients: a study conducted with personality disorder samples , 2013, BMC Medical Research Methodology.

[26]  A. Irisawa,et al.  CURRENT STATUS OF DIAGNOSTIC ENDOSCOPIC ULTRASONOGRAPHY IN THE EVALUATION OF PANCREATIC MASS LESIONS , 2011, Digestive endoscopy : official journal of the Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society.

[27]  Y. Hatano,et al.  Macroscopic on-site quality evaluation of biopsy specimens to improve the diagnostic accuracy during EUS-guided FNA using a 19-gauge needle for solid lesions: a single-center prospective pilot study (MOSE study). , 2015, Gastrointestinal endoscopy.

[28]  Kevin W Eliceiri,et al.  Laser scanning confocal microscopy: history, applications, and related optical sectioning techniques. , 2014, Methods in molecular biology.