OBJECTIVES
To determine the effects of tubular resorbable polymer membranes on the healing of a segmental diaphyseal bone defect.
DESIGN
A randomized prospective study using the minipig model. Animals were evaluated with in vivo roentgenograms on a biweekly basis until explanted at twelve weeks.
SETTING
After surgery, animals were allowed unrestricted activity and weight bearing between twenty-four and forty-eight hours.
ANIMALS
Fifteen yearling Yucatan minipigs.
INTERVENTION
A 2.5- to 3.0-centimeter mid-diaphyseal defect was created in the middle third of the radius. Animals were assigned in groups of three to receive the following implants: (a) poly(L/DL-lactide), (b) poly(L/DL-lactide)-CaCO3, (c) poly(D-lactide), (d) poly(D-lactide)-CaCO3, and (e) an untreated defect. No adjunctive internal or external fixation was used as the ulna was left intact.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES
The limbs were studied with in vivo anterior-posterior and lateral radiographs at biweekly intervals for the presence and pattern of bone formation. All limbs were explanted at twelve weeks postimplantation for methyl-methacrylate embedding and histologic and microradiographic study.
RESULTS
The bone defects covered with membranes were completely reconstituted by six to eight weeks. Untreated defects healed with less bone formation and in a more disorganized pattern. Histologic evaluation of the implants demonstrated that the entire lumen of the implant was filled with bone, with some periosteal bone formation occurring on the outer surface of the membrane. There was direct apposition of bone onto the membrane surface or minimal fibrous tissue interposition between membrane and new bone. There was no foreign body or adverse reaction to the membrane. Untreated defects showed woven bone formation with clefts and irregularly shaped margins occupied by fibrous tissues or surrounding muscle tissues.
CONCLUSIONS
This study supports the concept that a membrane enhances bone defect healing by excluding nonosseous tissues from a defect and providing structural scaffolding for periosteal and endosteal bone regeneration.
[1]
S M Perren,et al.
Bone regeneration with resorbable polymeric membranes: treatment of diaphyseal bone defects in the rabbit radius with poly(L-lactide) membrane. A pilot study.
,
1996,
Journal of orthopaedic trauma.
[2]
N. Lang,et al.
Regeneration and enlargement of jaw bone using guided tissue regeneration.
,
1990,
Clinical oral implants research.
[3]
S. Mackinnon.
New directions in peripheral nerve surgery.
,
1989,
Annals of plastic surgery.
[4]
S. Nyman,et al.
Guided bone regeneration of cranial defects, using biodegradable barriers: an experimental pilot study in the rabbit.
,
1992,
Journal of cranio-maxillo-facial surgery : official publication of the European Association for Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgery.
[5]
S. Gogolewski,et al.
Bone regeneration with resorbable polymeric membranes. III. Effect of poly(L-lactide) membrane pore size on the bone healing process in large defects.
,
1996,
Journal of biomedical materials research.
[6]
C. Batich,et al.
New attachment formation following controlled tissue regeneration using biodegradable membranes.
,
1988,
Journal of periodontology.