The two faces of conscientiousness: duty and achievement striving in escalation of commitment dilemmas.

The author proposes that 2 facets of conscientiousness, duty and achievement striving, affect decision makers in escalation of commitment dilemmas in opposing ways, thus masking the predictive ability of a broad measure of conscientiousness. It is proposed that duty is associated with an other-centered orientation and that achievement striving is associated with a self-centered orientation. Analyses of decisions from 360 respondents showed that duty was associated with a deescalation of commitment, achievement striving was associated with an escalation of commitment, and the broad measure of conscientiousness was unassociated with commitment. The author advocates the utility of understanding potential self-centered versus other-centered aspects of the criterion of interest when conducting personality-based research.

[1]  L. Festinger,et al.  A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance , 2017 .

[2]  J. Hollenbeck,et al.  An empirical examination of the antecedents of commitment to difficult goals. , 1989 .

[3]  Naomi Ellemers,et al.  Career-oriented versus team-oriented commitment and behavior at work , 1998 .

[4]  H. Klein,et al.  Organizational socialization: Its content and consequences. , 1994 .

[5]  D. Jackson,et al.  A five-factor versus six-factor model of personality structure , 1996 .

[6]  J. M. Digman,et al.  Further specification of the five robust factors of personality. , 1986 .

[7]  M. Ashton.  Personality and job performance: the importance of narrow traits , 1998 .

[8]  R. Cattell.  Theory of fluid and crystallized intelligence: A critical experiment. , 1963 .

[9]  J. Hunter,et al.  Validity and Utility of Alternative Predictors of Job Performance , 1984 .

[10]  Arnold H. Buss,et al.  Classification of personality traits. , 1987 .

[11]  J. R. Royce.  Multivariate analysis and psychological theory , 1973 .

[12]  D. Bakan.  The duality of human existence: Isolation and communion in Western man , 1966 .

[13]  Mark A. Davis,et al.  A study of escalating commitment in principal–agent relationships: Effects of monitoring and personal responsibility. , 1998 .

[14]  J. Hogan,et al.  Issues and non‐issues in the fidelity–bandwidth trade‐off , 1996 .

[15]  Ralph L. Rosnow,et al.  Essentials of Behavioral Research: Methods and Data Analysis , 1984 .

[16]  Newell K. Eaton,et al.  Criterion-related validities of personality constructs and the effect of response distortion on those validities , 1990 .

[17]  R. Hogan.  Personality and personality measurement. , 1991 .

[18]  D. Jackson,et al.  The six-factor model of personality: Facets from the Big Five. , 1996 .

[19]  Raymond B. Cattell,et al.  Confirmation and clarification of primary personality factors , 1947, Psychometrika.

[20]  G. Āllport,et al.  Trait-names: A psycho-lexical study. , 1936 .

[21]  D. Organ.  Organizational citizenship behavior: The good soldier syndrome. , 1988 .

[22]  L. Thurstone,et al.  Factorial Studies Of Intelligence , 1941 .

[23]  Donald E. Conlon,et al.  The Role of Project Completion Information in Resource Allocation Decisions , 1993 .

[24]  L. R. Goldberg,et al.  Category breadth and hierarchical structure in personality: studies of asymmetries in judgments of trait implications. , 1986, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[25]  J. Hunter.  Cognitive ability, cognitive aptitudes, job knowledge, and job performance , 1986 .

[26]  Donald E. Conlon,et al.  Too Close to Quit: The Role of Project Completion in Maintaining Commitment1 , 1998 .

[27]  Zur Shapira,et al.  Organizational decision making: Preference processing , 1996 .

[28]  K. Murphy.  Is the relationship between cognitive ability and job performance stable over time , 1989 .

[29]  Murray R. Barrick,et al.  Conscientiousness and performance of sales representatives: Test of the mediating effects of goal setting. , 1993 .

[30]  Hans J. Eysenck,et al.  Handbook of abnormal psychology , 1962 .

[31]  Jennifer A. Chatman,et al.  Culture as social control: Corporations, cults, and commitment. , 1996 .

[32]  H. Eysenck.  Biological Basis of Personality , 1963, Nature.

[33]  M. C. Jensen,et al.  Harvard Business School; SSRN; National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER); European Corporate Governance Institute (ECGI); Harvard University - Accounting & Control Unit , 1976 .

[34]  Greg L. Stewart,et al.  THE JOINT EFFECTS OF CONSCIENTIOUSNESS AND SELF‐LEADERSHIP TRAINING ON EMPLOYEE SELF‐DIRECTED BEHAVIOR IN A SERVICE SETTING , 1996 .

[35]  Greg L. Stewart,et al.  Trait bandwidth and stages of job performance : Assessing differential effects for conscientiousness and its subtraits , 1999 .

[36]  Murray R. Barrick,et al.  THE BIG FIVE PERSONALITY DIMENSIONS AND JOB PERFORMANCE: A META-ANALYSIS , 1991 .

[37]  Henry Moon,et al.  Looking forward and looking back: integrating completion and sunk-cost effects within an escalation-of-commitment progress decision. , 2001, The Journal of applied psychology.

[38]  Kevin S. Groves,et al.  Convergent Evidence for Basic Motivational Dimensions , 1987 .

[39]  J. Gray,et al.  The psychophysiological basis of introversion-extraversion. , 1970, Behaviour research and therapy.

[40]  M. Bolino.  Citizenship and Impression Management: Good Soldiers or Good Actors? , 1999 .

[41]  J. Salgado.  The Five Factor Model of personality and job performance in the European Community. , 1997, The Journal of applied psychology.

[42]  G. Stewart,et al.  Reward structure as a moderator of the relationship between extraversion and sales performance. , 1996, The Journal of applied psychology.

[43]  J. M. Digman,et al.  Factors In The Natural Language Of Personality: Re-Analysis, Comparison, And Interpretation Of Six Major Studies. , 1981, Multivariate behavioral research.

[44]  J. Guilford,et al.  The nature of human intelligence. , 1968 .

[45]  W. Mischel.  On the future of personality measurement. , 1977 .

[46]  J. S. Wiggins,et al.  Extension of the Interpersonal Adjective Scales to include the Big Five dimensions of personality. , 1990 .

[47]  J. Brockner.  The Escalation of Commitment to a Failing Course of Action: Toward Theoretical Progress , 1992 .

[48]  M. D. Dunnette,et al.  Broadsided by broad traits: How to sink science in five dimensions or less , 1996 .

[49]  Joel Brockner,et al.  Face-Saving and Entrapment , 1981 .

[50]  K. Eisenhardt.  Agency Theory: An Assessment and Review , 1989 .

[51]  D. Mcclelland,et al.  The Achievement Motive , 1954 .

[52]  H. Garland.  Throwing Good Money After Bad: The Effect of Sunk Costs on the Decision to Escalate Commitment to an Ongoing Project , 1990 .

[53]  Barry M. Staw,et al.  ORGANIZATIONAL ESCALATION AND EXIT: LESSONS FROM THE SHOREHAM NUCLEAR POWER PLANT , 1993 .

[54]  H. Arkes,et al.  The Psychology of Sunk Cost , 1985 .

[55]  W. T. Norman,et al.  Toward an adequate taxonomy of personality attributes: replicated factors structure in peer nomination personality ratings. , 1963, Journal of abnormal and social psychology.

[56]  Barry M. Staw,et al.  Commitment in an experimenting society: A study of the attribution of leadership from administrative scenarios. , 1980 .

[57]  Larry L. Cummings,et al.  Information and cognition in organizations , 1990 .

[58]  Barry M. Staw,et al.  Knee-deep in the Big Muddy: A study of escalating commitment to a chosen course of action. , 1976 .

[59]  Chockalingam Viswesvaran,et al.  Bandwidth-fidelity dilemma in personality measurement for personnel selection , 1996 .

[60]  Joseph J. Martocchio,et al.  Five-factor model of personality and employee absence , 1997 .