The dual nature of adaptive coordination in teams

Adaptive team coordination is a central topic in the team dynamics literature. Most team adaptation research to date addresses team responses to demands for flexibility triggered by dynamic external forces. Little explicit attention has been paid to demands for stability created by continued pressures on efficiency and control. To capture this dual nature of adaptive coordination, we propose to characterize adaptation triggers in terms of stability and flexibility demands and suggest four modes of adaptive coordination that enable teams to adequately balance these demands. Grounded in team as well as organizational literatures, we explicate the specific patterns of coordination mechanisms comprising each mode of coordination, termed experiential, exploitative, exploratory, and ambidextrous coordination. The new insights offered into team adaptive coordination can spur research that further integrates team and organizational perspectives on adaptation processes.

[1]  Carrie R. Leana,et al.  Stability and Change as Simultaneous Experiences in Organizational Life , 2000 .

[2]  P. Lawrence,et al.  Differentiation and Integration in Complex Organizations , 1967 .

[3]  Bradley L. Kirkman,et al.  Managing a new collaborative entity in business organizations: understanding organizational communities of practice effectiveness. , 2011, The Journal of applied psychology.

[4]  J. Stuart Bunderson,et al.  Structure and Learning in Self-Managed Teams: Why "Bureaucratic" Teams Can Be Better Learners , 2010, Organ. Sci..

[5]  Ramón Rico,et al.  Fluid and stable: Dynamics of team action patterns and adaptive outcomes , 2018 .

[6]  Dawna I. Ballard,et al.  Time to Re-Group , 2012 .

[7]  Eduardo Salas,et al.  Understanding adaptability : a prerequisite for effective performance within complex environments , 2006 .

[8]  A. Amin,et al.  Knowing in action: beyond communities of practice , 2008 .

[9]  Ingrid M. Nembhard,et al.  Making It Safe: The Effects of Leader Inclusiveness and Professional Status on Psychological Safety and Improvement Efforts in Health Care Teams , 2006 .

[10]  Bianca Beersma,et al.  Need for structure as asset and liability in dynamic team decision-making. , 2016 .

[11]  M Riethmüller,et al.  Adaptive coordination development in student anaesthesia teams: a longitudinal study , 2012, Ergonomics.

[12]  Leslie A. DeChurch,et al.  Examining Team Planning Through an Episodic Lens , 2008 .

[13]  M. Tushman,et al.  Organizational Ambidexterity: Past, Present and Future , 2013 .

[14]  Jaclyn M. Jensen,et al.  Developing adaptive teams: A theory of dynamic team leadership , 2009 .

[15]  J. Lepine Adaptation of teams in response to unforeseen change: effects of goal difficulty and team composition in terms of cognitive ability and goal orientation. , 2005, The Journal of applied psychology.

[16]  A. V. D. Ven,et al.  The Concept of Fit in Contingency Theory. , 1984 .

[17]  Mary E. Zellmer-Bruhn,et al.  The Structural Context of Team Learning: Effects of Organizational and Team Structure on Internal and External Learning , 2013, Organ. Sci..

[18]  Timothy J. Vogus,et al.  The underappreciated role of habit in highly reliable healthcare , 2015, BMJ Quality & Safety.

[19]  D. S. Derue,et al.  Leadership in Teams: A Functional Approach to Understanding Leadership Structures and Processes , 2010 .

[20]  John E. Mathieu,et al.  Multiteam Systems: A Structural Framework and Meso-Theory of System Functioning , 2018 .

[21]  Beth A. Bechky,et al.  10 Coordination in Organizations: An Integrative Perspective , 2009 .

[22]  Kevin C. Stagl,et al.  Team Adaptation: Realizing Team Synergy , 2006 .

[23]  H. P. Sims,et al.  Contingent leadership and effectiveness of trauma resuscitation teams. , 2005, The Journal of applied psychology.

[24]  G Grote,et al.  Adaptation in anaesthesia team coordination in response to a simulated critical event and its relationship to clinical performance. , 2011, British journal of anaesthesia.

[25]  Daniel R. Ilgen,et al.  A century of work teams in the Journal of Applied Psychology. , 2017, The Journal of applied psychology.

[26]  D. Mccormick Normal Accidents , 1991, Bio/Technology.

[27]  Henry Moon ASYMMETRIC ADAPTABILITY : DYNAMIC TEAM STRUCTURES AS ONE-WAY STREETS , 2004 .

[28]  Richard T. Vidgen,et al.  Coevolving Systems and the Organization of Agile Software Development , 2009, Inf. Syst. Res..

[29]  Stephen E. Humphrey,et al.  Team Member Change, Flux in Coordination, and Performance: Effects of Strategic Core Roles, Information Transfer, and Cognitive Ability , 2012 .

[30]  J. Mathieu,et al.  Performance implications of leader briefings and team-interaction training for team adaptation to novel environments. , 2000, The Journal of applied psychology.

[31]  Daniel R. Ilgen,et al.  Backing up behaviors in teams: the role of personality and legitimacy of need. , 2003, The Journal of applied psychology.

[32]  Gerardo A. Okhuysen,et al.  The Treatment of the Relationship Between Groups and Their Environments , 2012 .

[33]  A. Richter,et al.  The Whole Is More Than the Sum of Its Parts— Or Is It? A Review of the Empirical Literature on Complementarities in Organizations , 2010 .

[34]  K. Weick,et al.  Organizing for high reliability: Processes of collective mindfulness. , 1999 .

[35]  S. Kozlowski Advancing research on team process dynamics , 2015 .

[36]  G. Grote,et al.  Adaptive coordination and heedfulness make better cockpit crews , 2010, Ergonomics.

[37]  Justin W. Webb,et al.  When goal orientations collide: effects of learning and performance orientation on team adaptability in response to workload imbalance. , 2010, The Journal of applied psychology.

[38]  James D. Thompson Organizations in Action , 1967 .

[39]  Gudela Grote,et al.  Speaking up in ad hoc multiteam systems: Individual-level effects of psychological safety, status, and leadership within and across teams , 2014 .

[40]  J. A. Lepine,et al.  Team adaptation and postchange performance: effects of team composition in terms of members' cognitive ability and personality. , 2003, The Journal of applied psychology.

[41]  John E. Mathieu,et al.  A Temporally Based Framework and Taxonomy of Team Processes , 2001 .

[42]  P. Adler,et al.  Two Types of Bureaucracy: Enabling and Coercive , 1996 .

[43]  Johannes Wacker,et al.  Speaking Up Is Related to Better Team Performance in Simulated Anesthesia Inductions: An Observational Study , 2012, Anesthesia and analgesia.

[44]  John M. Jermier,et al.  Substitutes for leadership: Their meaning and measurement , 1978 .

[45]  K. Sutcliffe,et al.  Management team learning orientation and business unit performance. , 2003, The Journal of applied psychology.

[46]  Kevin C. Stagl,et al.  Understanding team adaptation: a conceptual analysis and model. , 2006, The Journal of applied psychology.

[47]  Johannes Wacker,et al.  Monitoring and talking to the room: autochthonous coordination patterns in team interaction and performance. , 2014, The Journal of applied psychology.

[48]  J. Mathieu,et al.  A Meta-Analysis of Different Forms of Shared Leadership–Team Performance Relations , 2016 .

[49]  Shiko M. Ben-Menahem,et al.  Coordinating Knowledge Creation in Multidisciplinary Teams: Evidence from Early-Stage Drug Discovery , 2016 .

[50]  Deanna M. Kennedy,et al.  It is About Time: Temporal Considerations of Team Adaptation , 2017 .

[51]  J. Mathieu,et al.  CREATIVITY AND STANDARDIZATION: COMPLEMENTARY OR CONFLICTING DRIVERS OF TEAM EFFECTIVENESS? , 2005 .

[52]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  Exploration and Exploitation in Organizational Learning , 2007 .

[53]  Charles C. Manz,et al.  The New Silver Bullets of Leadership:: The Importance of Self- and Shared Leadership in Knowledge Work , 2005 .

[54]  Moshe Farjoun Beyond Dualism: Stability and Change As a Duality , 2010 .

[55]  Daniel R. Ilgen,et al.  Structural contingency theory and individual differences: examination of external and internal person-team fit. , 2002, The Journal of applied psychology.

[56]  Anita Williams Woolley,et al.  Means vs. Ends: Implications of Process and Outcome Focus for Team Adaptation and Performance , 2009, Organ. Sci..

[57]  Steve W. J. Kozlowski,et al.  Team learning, development, and adaptation , 2008 .

[58]  R. Wood Task complexity: Definition of the construct , 1986 .

[59]  William S. Kramer,et al.  The cognitive underpinnings of adaptive team performance in ill-defined task situations , 2014 .

[60]  A. V. D. Ven,et al.  Determinants of Coordination Modes within Organizations , 1976 .

[61]  C. Gersick,et al.  Habitual routines in task-performing groups. , 1990, Organizational behavior and human decision processes.

[62]  G. Grote,et al.  Substitutes for leadership in anaesthesia teams and their impact on leadership effectiveness , 2010 .

[63]  Rodrigo Canales,et al.  Weaving Straw into Gold: Managing Organizational Tensions Between Standardization and Flexibility in Microfinance , 2014, Organ. Sci..

[64]  S. Taggar,et al.  Leadership emergence in autonomous work teams: Antecedents and outcomes. , 1999 .

[65]  H. Tsoukas,et al.  Understanding the (Re)Creation of Routines from Within: A Symbolic Interactionist Perspective , 2013 .

[66]  Daniel R. Ilgen,et al.  Enhancing the Effectiveness of Work Groups and Teams , 2006, Psychological science in the public interest : a journal of the American Psychological Society.

[67]  Beth A. Bechky,et al.  Expecting the Unexpected? How SWAT Officers and Film Crews Handle Surprises , 2011 .

[68]  J. Stuart Bunderson,et al.  When feeling safe isn’t enough , 2015 .

[69]  R. Lord,et al.  Leadership and collective requisite complexity , 2011 .

[70]  Amy C. Edmondson,et al.  Team Scaffolds: How Mesolevel Structures Enable Role-Based Coordination in Temporary Groups , 2015, Organ. Sci..

[71]  Jan U. Hagen,et al.  Team Adaptiveness in Dynamic Contexts , 2016 .

[72]  S. Tarba,et al.  Organizational Ambidexterity and Performance: A Meta-Analysis , 2013 .

[73]  Isabelle Dostaler,et al.  Combining old and new tricks: ambidexterity in aerospace design and integration teams , 2013 .

[74]  Peter A. Bamberger,et al.  Can Surgical Teams Ever Learn? The Role of Coordination, Complexity, and Transitivity in Action Team Learning , 2013 .

[75]  Greg L. Stewart,et al.  Attaining Flexible Stability by Integrating Total Quality Management and Socio-Technical Systems Theory , 1997 .

[76]  J. Christian,et al.  Team adaptation in context: An integrated conceptual model and meta-analytic review , 2017 .

[77]  D. Waldman,et al.  A meta-analysis of shared leadership and team effectiveness. , 2014, The Journal of applied psychology.

[78]  C. Perrow A FRAMEWORK FOR THE COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF ORGANIZATIONS , 1967 .

[79]  H. P. Sims,et al.  Examining the Differential Longitudinal Performance of Directive versus Empowering Leadership in Teams , 2013 .

[80]  David A. Waldman,et al.  Learning to be a paradox-savvy leader , 2016, IEEE Engineering Management Review.

[81]  Sharon K. Parker,et al.  Proactivity routines: The role of social processes in how employees self-initiate change , 2017 .

[82]  L. Argote Input uncertainty and organizational coordination in hospital emergency units. , 1982, Administrative science quarterly.

[83]  A. Langley,et al.  Leadership in the Plural , 2012 .

[84]  Gudela Grote,et al.  Routine interdependencies as a source of stability and flexibility. A study of agile software development teams , 2016, Inf. Organ..

[85]  Wendy K. Smith,et al.  Paradox Research in Management Science: Looking Back to Move Forward , 2016 .

[86]  Gilad Chen,et al.  Leadership and Member Voice in Action Teams: Test of a Dynamic Phase Model , 2017, The Journal of applied psychology.

[87]  Bianca Beersma,et al.  Cutthroat cooperation: The effects of team role decisions on adaptation to alternative reward structures , 2009 .

[88]  Martha S. Feldman,et al.  Toward a Theory of Coordinating: Creating Coordinating Mechanisms in Practice , 2012, Organ. Sci..

[89]  Stephen Hill,et al.  Why Quality Circles Failed but Total Quality Management Might Succeed , 1991 .

[90]  S. Kozlowski,et al.  Performance Adaptation , 2014 .

[91]  Michael Frese,et al.  Explaining the Heterogeneity of the Leadership-Innovation Relationship: Ambidextrous Leadership , 2011 .

[92]  Gudela Grote,et al.  Promoting safety by increasing uncertainty – Implications for risk management , 2015 .

[93]  Richard A. McDermott,et al.  Harnessing your staff's informal networks. , 2010, Harvard business review.

[94]  Seth A. Kaplan,et al.  The benefits of flexible team interaction during crises. , 2009, The Journal of applied psychology.

[95]  Robyn A. McDermott 10 critical success factors in building communities of practice , 2001 .

[96]  Leslie A. DeChurch,et al.  Building team adaptive capacity: the roles of sensegiving and team composition. , 2011, The Journal of applied psychology.

[97]  Michael D. Ensley,et al.  The Importance of Vertical and Shared Leadership within New Venture Top Management Teams: Implications for the Performance of Startups , 2006 .

[98]  Gudela Grote,et al.  Coordination in high-risk organizations: the need for flexible routines , 2009, Cognition, Technology & Work.

[99]  D. Denison,et al.  Paradox and Performance: Toward a Theory of Behavioral Complexity in Managerial Leadership , 1995 .

[100]  C. Gibson,et al.  THE ANTECEDENTS , CONSEQUENCES , AND MEDIATING ROLE OF ORGANIZATIONAL AMBIDEXTERITY , 2004 .

[101]  E. Lawler,et al.  Quality circles after the fad. , 1985, Harvard business review.

[102]  Gilad Chen,et al.  A multilevel examination of the relationships among training outcomes, mediating regulatory processes, and adaptive performance. , 2005, The Journal of applied psychology.

[103]  Gerard Beenen,et al.  Motivating creativity: The effects of sequential and simultaneous learning and performance achievement goals on product novelty and usefulness , 2015 .

[104]  J. Birkinshaw,et al.  Management innovation , 2005, IEEE Engineering Management Review.

[105]  John R. Hollenbeck,et al.  Managing coordination in multiteam systems: integrating micro and macro perspectives , 2016, IEEE Engineering Management Review.

[106]  C. de Snoo,et al.  An empirical investigation of scheduling performance criteria , 2011 .

[107]  Dustin K. Jundt,et al.  Teams in organizations: from input-process-output models to IMOI models. , 2005, Annual review of psychology.

[108]  Elliot E. Entin,et al.  Adaptive Team Coordination , 1999, Hum. Factors.

[109]  Deanna M. Kennedy,et al.  Team adaptation: A fifteen-year synthesis (1998–2013) and framework for how this literature needs to “adapt” going forward , 2015 .

[110]  John E. Mathieu,et al.  A Review and Integration of Team Composition Models , 2014 .

[111]  Brian T. Pentland,et al.  Organizational Routines as Patterns of Action: Implications for Organizational Behavior , 2015 .

[112]  Wendy K. Smith,et al.  TOWARD A THEORY OF PARADOX : A DYNAMIC EQUILIBRIUM MODEL OF ORGANIZING , 2011 .

[113]  Pedro J. Ramos-Villagrasa,et al.  Teams as Complex Adaptive Systems: Reviewing 17 Years of Research , 2017, Small Group Research.

[114]  Henk W. Volberda,et al.  Towards The Flexible Form: How To Remain Vital in Hypercompetitive Environments , 1996 .

[115]  Robert C. Giambatista,et al.  Effects of Adaptive Behaviors and Shared Mental Models on Control Crew Performance , 2004, Manag. Sci..

[116]  Jennifer A. Howard-Grenville,et al.  Routines Revisited: Exploring the Capabilities and Practice Perspectives , 2011 .

[117]  Michael L. Tushman,et al.  Information Processing as an Integrating Concept in Organizational Design. , 1978 .

[118]  Yan Xiao,et al.  Dynamic Delegation: Shared, Hierarchical, and Deindividualized Leadership in Extreme Action Teams , 2006 .

[119]  Norbert K. Semmer,et al.  Human factors in the operating room – The surgeon's view , 2012 .

[120]  Hans-Georg Gemünden,et al.  Interteam Coordination, Project Commitment, and Teamwork in Multiteam R&D Projects: A Longitudinal Study , 2004, Organ. Sci..

[121]  M. Feldman,et al.  Reconceptualizing Organizational Routines as a Source of Flexibility and Change , 2003 .

[122]  A. V. D. Ven,et al.  Returning to the Frontier of Contingency Theory of Organizational and Institutional Designs , 2013 .

[123]  Stephen E. Humphrey,et al.  Asymmetry in structural adaptation: The differential impact of centralizing versus decentralizing team decision-making structures , 2011 .

[124]  E. Heimberg,et al.  Effective coordination in medical emergency teams: The moderating role of task type , 2015 .

[125]  Diether Gebert,et al.  Fostering Team Innovation: Why Is It Important to Combine Opposing Action Strategies? , 2010, Organ. Sci..

[126]  P. May Regulatory regimes and accountability , 2007 .

[127]  Yan Xiao,et al.  Coordination in Fast-Response Organizations , 2006, Manag. Sci..

[128]  C. Gibson,et al.  Team Implicit Coordination Processes: A Team Knowledge–Based Approach , 2008 .

[129]  John Rohrbaugh,et al.  A Spatial Model of Effectiveness Criteria: Towards a Competing Values Approach to Organizational Analysis , 1983 .

[130]  C. Eden,et al.  Thinking together: What makes Communities of Practice work? , 2016, Human relations; studies towards the integration of the social sciences.

[131]  Dustin K. Jundt,et al.  HOW DIFFERENT TEAM DOWNSIZING APPROACHES INFLUENCE TEAM-LEVEL ADAPTATION AND PERFORMANCE , 2008 .

[132]  J. McGrath Time, Interaction, and Performance (TIP) , 1991 .

[133]  Mark Patterson,et al.  Advancing research , 2014, eLife.

[134]  David J. Ketchen,et al.  Research on Organizational Configurations: Past Accomplishments and Future Challenges , 2008 .