Transanal minimally invasive surgery (TAMI S) versus endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for resection of non-pedunculated rectal lesions (TRIASSIC study): study protocol of a European multicenter randomised controlled trial

Background: In the recent years two innovative approaches have become available for minimally invasive en bloc resections of large non-pedunculated rectal lesions (polyps and early cancers). One is Transanal Minimally Invasive Surgery (TAMIS), the other is Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection (ESD). Both techniques are standard of care, but a direct randomised comparison is lacking. The choice between either of these procedures is dependent on local expertise or availability rather than evidence-based. The European Society for Endoscopy Methods: Multicenter randomised trial in 15 hospitals in the Netherlands. Patients with non-pedunculated lesions > 2 cm, where the bulk of the lesion is below 15 cm from the anal verge, will be randomised between either a TAMIS or an ESD procedure. Lesions judged to be deeply invasive by an expert panel will be excluded. The primary endpoint is the cumulative local recurrence rate at follow-up rectoscopy at 12 months. Secondary endpoints are: 1) Radical (R0-) resection rate; 2) Perceived burden and quality of life; 3) Cost effectiveness at 12 months; 4) Surgical referral rate at 12 months; 5) Complication rate; 6) Local recurrence rate at 6 months. For this non-inferiority trial, the total sample size of 198 is based on an expected local recurrence rate of 3% in the ESD group, 6% in the TAMIS group and considering a difference of less than 6% to be non-inferior. Discussion: This is the first European randomised controlled trial comparing the effectiveness and safety of TAMIS and ESD for the en bloc resection of large non-pedunculated rectal lesions. This is important as the detection rate of these adenomas is expected to further increase with the introduction of colorectal screening programs throughout Europe. This study will therefore support an optimal use of healthcare resources in the future.

[1]  W. Bernardo,et al.  Endoscopic submucosal dissection versus transanal endoscopic surgery for the treatment of early rectal tumor: a systematic review and meta-analysis , 2019, Surgical Endoscopy.

[2]  C. Thompson,et al.  Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) versus transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM) for treatment of rectal tumors: a comparative systematic review and meta-analysis , 2019, Surgical Endoscopy.

[3]  E. Dekker,et al.  Stage distribution of screen-detected colorectal cancers in the Netherlands , 2017, Gut.

[4]  K. Byth,et al.  Risk Stratification for Covert Invasive Cancer Among Patients Referred for Colonic Endoscopic Mucosal Resection: A Large Multicenter Cohort. , 2017, Gastroenterology.

[5]  E. Consten,et al.  Randomised controlled trial of transanal endoscopic microsurgery versus endoscopic mucosal resection for large rectal adenomas (TREND Study) , 2017, Gut.

[6]  Paul Fockens,et al.  Colorectal polypectomy and endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR): European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Clinical Guideline , 2017, Endoscopy.

[7]  A. Stiggelbout,et al.  The EORTC QLQ-CR29 quality of life questionnaire for colorectal cancer: validation of the Dutch version , 2015, Quality of Life Research.

[8]  R. Maglio,et al.  Transanal Minimally Invasive Surgery (TAMIS): New Treatment for Early Rectal Cancer and Large Rectal Polyps—Experience of an Italian Center , 2015, The American surgeon.

[9]  B. Martín‐Pérez,et al.  A systematic review of transanal minimally invasive surgery (TAMIS) from 2010 to 2013 , 2014, Techniques in Coloproctology.

[10]  M. Morino,et al.  Systematic review and meta-analysis of endoscopic submucosal dissection versus transanal endoscopic microsurgery for large noninvasive rectal lesions , 2014, Surgical Endoscopy.

[11]  J. Rey,et al.  European guidelines for quality assurance in colorectal cancer screening and diagnosis. First Edition – Professional requirements and training , 2012, Endoscopy.

[12]  A. Zauber,et al.  Colonoscopic polypectomy and long-term prevention of colorectal-cancer deaths. , 2012, The New England journal of medicine.

[13]  Jae Bum Lee,et al.  Endoscopic treatment of large colorectal tumors: comparison of endoscopic mucosal resection, endoscopic mucosal resection–precutting, and endoscopic submucosal dissection , 2012, Surgical Endoscopy.

[14]  Jae-Joon Chung,et al.  Nodal Staging of Rectal Cancer: High-Resolution Pelvic MRI Versus 18F-FDGPET/CT , 2011, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[15]  K. Byth,et al.  Endoscopic mucosal resection outcomes and prediction of submucosal cancer from advanced colonic mucosal neoplasia. , 2011, Gastroenterology.

[16]  M. Albert,et al.  Transanal minimally invasive surgery: a giant leap forward , 2010, Surgical Endoscopy.

[17]  T. Itoi,et al.  Clinical outcome of endoscopic submucosal dissection versus endoscopic mucosal resection of large colorectal tumors as determined by curative resection , 2010, Surgical Endoscopy.

[18]  E. Kranenbarg,et al.  Transanal endoscopic microsurgery versus total mesorectal excision of T1 rectal adenocarcinomas with curative intention. , 2009, European journal of surgical oncology : the journal of the European Society of Surgical Oncology and the British Association of Surgical Oncology.

[19]  W. Bemelman,et al.  Transanal endoscopic microsurgery versus endoscopic mucosal resection for large rectal adenomas (TREND-study) , 2009, BMC surgery.

[20]  W. Brugge,et al.  Accuracy of Endoscopic Ultrasound to Diagnose Nodal Invasion by Rectal Cancers: A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review , 2009, Annals of Surgical Oncology.

[21]  N. Yamamichi,et al.  Outcomes of endoscopic submucosal dissection for colorectal epithelial neoplasms in 200 consecutive cases. , 2007, Clinical gastroenterology and hepatology : the official clinical practice journal of the American Gastroenterological Association.

[22]  M. Taupitz,et al.  Local staging of rectal cancer: the current role of MRI , 2006, European Radiology.

[23]  W. Bemelman,et al.  Development and validation of a colorectal functional outcome questionnaire , 2005, International Journal of Colorectal Disease.

[24]  H. Barr,et al.  Staging Early Esophageal Cancer. , 2016, Advances in experimental medicine and biology.

[25]  Hilde van der Togt,et al.  Publisher's Note , 2003, J. Netw. Comput. Appl..