A hybrid data analytic methodology for 3PL transportation provider evaluation using fuzzy multi-criteria decision making

Third-party logistics (3PL) service provider selection for a strategic alliance is not an easy decision, and is constantly associated with uncertainty and complexity. For this reason, in this study, a hybrid fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making methodology is proposed to provide a systematic decision support tool for 3PL provider evaluation, especially for 3PL transportation provider. The proposed evaluation methodology consists of several steps. First, the strategic goal and sub-attributes are identified for 3PL service provider evaluation. After constructing the hierarchy, Buckley’s fuzzy-analytical hierarchy process (AHP) extension algorithm is used to determine the evaluation criteria weights. Then, by using fuzzy-AHP results as input weights, the fuzzy-Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution technique is conducted in order to identify the most suitable third-party providers. Finally, a real-life case study in a confectionary company is presented to demonstrate the potential use of the methodology and a sensitivity analysis is performed to analyse the hybrid methodology proposed here. In the conclusion of the study, future recommendations are presented.

[1]  C. Hwang Multiple Objective Decision Making - Methods and Applications: A State-of-the-Art Survey , 1979 .

[2]  Ching-Lai Hwang,et al.  Multiple Attribute Decision Making: Methods and Applications - A State-of-the-Art Survey , 1981, Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems.

[3]  W. Pedrycz,et al.  A fuzzy extension of Saaty's priority theory , 1983 .

[4]  J. Buckley Ranking alternatives using fuzzy numbers , 1985 .

[5]  Mao-Jiun J. Wang,et al.  A fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making method for facility site selection , 1991 .

[6]  H. Zimmermann,et al.  Fuzzy Set Theory and Its Applications , 1993 .

[7]  Mao-Jiun J. Wang,et al.  Personnel selection using fuzzy MCDM algorithm , 1994 .

[8]  P R Murphy,et al.  DETERMINANTS OF SUCCESSFUL LOGISTICAL RELATIONSHIPS: A THIRD-PARTY PROVIDER PERSPECTIVE , 1995 .

[9]  D. Chang Applications of the extent analysis method on fuzzy AHP , 1996 .

[10]  M. Razzaque,et al.  Outsourcing of logistics functions: a literature survey , 1998 .

[11]  Jian-Bo Yang,et al.  Multiple Criteria Decision Support in Engineering Design , 1998 .

[12]  J. Buckley,et al.  Fuzzy hierarchical analysis , 1999, FUZZ-IEEE'99. 1999 IEEE International Fuzzy Systems. Conference Proceedings (Cat. No.99CH36315).

[13]  T. Skjoett‐Larsen,et al.  Third party logistics – from an interorganizational point of view , 2000 .

[14]  Ruoning Xu,et al.  Fuzzy least-squares priority method in the analytic hierarchy process , 2000, Fuzzy Sets Syst..

[15]  Chen-Tung Chen,et al.  Extensions of the TOPSIS for group decision-making under fuzzy environment , 2000, Fuzzy Sets Syst..

[16]  Paul D. Larson,et al.  Logistics in Denmark: A Survey of the Industry , 2001 .

[17]  James J. Buckley,et al.  Fuzzy hierarchical analysis: the Lambda-Max method , 2001, Fuzzy Sets Syst..

[18]  Theodor J. Stewart,et al.  Multiple criteria decision analysis - an integrated approach , 2001 .

[19]  H. Kotzab,et al.  Supply Chain Management: The Integration of Logistics in Marketing , 2001 .

[20]  M. Razzaque,et al.  Determinants of Outsourcing Decisions: An Empirical Investigation in an Asian NIC—Singapore , 2002 .

[21]  Professor Lars Erik Gadde THIRD PARTY LOGISTICS AND LOGISTICS ALLIANCES-OUTSOURCING OF ACTIVITIES OR “ INSOURCING ” OF RESOURCES ? , 2002 .

[22]  Theodor J. Stewart,et al.  Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis , 2001 .

[23]  Ludmil Mikhailov,et al.  Deriving priorities from fuzzy pairwise comparison judgements , 2003, Fuzzy Sets Syst..

[24]  Amrik S. Sohal,et al.  The use of third party logistics services: a Malaysian perspective , 2003 .

[25]  E. Ertugrul Karsak,et al.  Fuzzy multiple objective decision making approach to prioritize design requirements in quality function deployment , 2004 .

[26]  E. E. Karsak *,et al.  Practical common weight multi-criteria decision-making approach with an improved discriminating power for technology selection , 2005 .

[27]  Ganesh Vaidyanathan,et al.  A framework for evaluating third-party logistics , 2005, CACM.

[28]  H. S. Byun,et al.  A decision support system for the selection of a rapid prototyping process using the modified TOPSIS method , 2005 .

[29]  C. Carter,et al.  Opportunities for Research in Third-Party Logistics , 2006, Transportation Journal.

[30]  B. S. Sahay,et al.  3PL practices: an Indian perspective , 2006 .

[31]  A. Rizzi,et al.  A fuzzy TOPSIS methodology to support outsourcing of logistics services , 2006 .

[32]  Zhongsheng Hua,et al.  A modified fuzzy logarithmic least squares method for fuzzy analytic hierarchy process , 2006, Fuzzy Sets Syst..

[33]  A Study into the Impact of Logistics Sophistication of Brazilian Shippers in the Pattern of Contracting theServices of Logistics Operators , 2007 .

[34]  Gülçin Büyüközkan,et al.  A two phase multi-attribute decision-making approach for new product introduction , 2007, Inf. Sci..

[35]  Gülçin Büyüközkan,et al.  Application of a hybrid intelligent decision support model in logistics outsourcing , 2007, Comput. Oper. Res..

[36]  A. Ravi Ravindran,et al.  Vendor selection in outsourcing , 2007, Comput. Oper. Res..

[37]  Cengiz Kahraman,et al.  Hierarchical fuzzy TOPSIS model for selection among logistics information technologies , 2007, J. Enterp. Inf. Manag..

[38]  Cengiz Kahraman,et al.  Prioritization of human capital measurement indicators using fuzzy AHP , 2007, Expert Syst. Appl..

[39]  Bülent Çatay,et al.  Logistics outsourcing and 3PL selection: A Case study in an automotive supply chain , 2007 .

[40]  Ravi Shankar,et al.  Selection of logistics service provider: An analytic network process (ANP) approach , 2007 .

[41]  Zhongsheng Hua,et al.  On the extent analysis method for fuzzy AHP and its applications , 2008, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[42]  Sheu Hua Chen,et al.  An integral constrained generalized hub-and-spoke network design problem , 2008 .

[43]  George Botzoris,et al.  Benefits, Risks, Selection Criteria and Success Factors for Third-Party Logistics Services , 2008 .

[44]  P. Wong,et al.  Evaluation of factors for carrier selection in the China Pearl River delta , 2008 .

[45]  Kim Hua Tan,et al.  Leveraging the supply chain flexibility of third party logistics - Hybrid knowledge-based system approach , 2008, Expert Syst. Appl..

[46]  İrfan Ertuğrul,et al.  Comparison of fuzzy AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS methods for facility location selection , 2008 .

[47]  T.-F. Liang,et al.  Integrating production-transportation planning decision with fuzzy multiple goals in supply chains , 2008 .

[48]  Metin Celik,et al.  Structuring fuzzy integrated multi-stages evaluation model on academic personnel recruitment in MET institutions , 2009, Expert Syst. Appl..

[49]  Selçuk Perçin,et al.  Evaluation of third‐party logistics (3PL) providers by using a two‐phase AHP and TOPSIS methodology , 2009 .

[50]  Ching-Hsue Cheng,et al.  Fuzzy hierarchical TOPSIS for supplier selection , 2009, Appl. Soft Comput..

[51]  Reza Farzipoor Saen,et al.  A mathematical model for selecting third-party reverse logistics providers , 2009 .

[52]  Tien-Chin Wang,et al.  Developing a fuzzy TOPSIS approach based on subjective weights and objective weights , 2009, Expert Syst. Appl..

[53]  Yu Tian,et al.  A framework of supplier selection of Integrative Logistics Providers , 2009 .

[54]  Wei-Kai Wang,et al.  An integrated fuzzy approach for provider evaluation and selection in third-party logistics , 2009, Expert Syst. Appl..

[55]  M. Yurdakul,et al.  Analysis of the benefit generated by using fuzzy numbers in a TOPSIS model developed for machine tool selection problems , 2009 .

[56]  Keah Choon Tan,et al.  Supply chain integration with third-party logistics providers , 2010 .

[57]  Josefa Mula,et al.  Production , Manufacturing and Logistics A fuzzy linear programming based approach for tactical supply chain planning in an uncertainty environment , 2010 .

[58]  Liang-Hsuan Chen,et al.  An integrated fuzzy approach for the selection of outsourcing manufacturing partners in pharmaceutical R&D , 2010 .

[59]  S. Pugazhendhi,et al.  Perceptions of service providers and customers of key success factors of third-party logistics relationships – an empirical study , 2011 .

[60]  Jin Wang,et al.  Approximate TOPSIS for vessel selection under uncertain environment , 2011, Expert Syst. Appl..

[61]  Stephan M. Wagner,et al.  A qualitative investigation of innovation between third-‐party logistics providers and customers , 2012 .

[62]  Zeki Ayağ,et al.  Evaluating machine tool alternatives through modified TOPSIS and alpha-cut based fuzzy ANP , 2012 .

[63]  Ahmet Can Kutlu,et al.  Fuzzy failure modes and effects analysis by using fuzzy TOPSIS-based fuzzy AHP , 2012, Expert Syst. Appl..

[64]  Dursun Delen,et al.  Development of a fuzzy ANP based SWOT analysis for the airline industry in Turkey , 2012, Expert Syst. Appl..

[65]  Bohui Pang,et al.  An integrated fuzzy synthetic evaluation approach for supplier selection based on analytic network process , 2013, J. Intell. Manuf..

[66]  Premaratne Samaranayake,et al.  A fuzzy-based decision support model for monitoring on-time delivery performance: A textile industry case study , 2013, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[67]  Jafar Rezaei,et al.  Production , Manufacturing and Logistics Multi-criteria supplier segmentation using a fuzzy preference relations based AHP , 2012 .

[68]  Yan Cui,et al.  Fourth party logistics routing problem with fuzzy duration time , 2013 .

[69]  Kemal Vatansever,et al.  Fuzzy Performance Evaluation with AHP and Topsis Methods: Evidence from Turkish Banking Sector after the Global Financial Crisis , 2013 .

[70]  Danijela Tadic,et al.  An evaluation of quality goals by using fuzzy AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS methodology , 2013, J. Intell. Fuzzy Syst..

[71]  Yacine Ouzrout,et al.  Multi-criteria decision making based on trust and reputation in supply chain☆ , 2014 .

[72]  Mark Goh,et al.  A multi-objective approach to supply chain visibility and risk , 2014, Eur. J. Oper. Res..