Increasingly in Australia, attention is being given in English or language education to core or functional literacy conceived as print mastery, alongside literature, and critical literacy. The Queensland Years 1 to 10 English syllabus evinces an attempt to organize such qualitatively distinct "literacies" under a burgeoning conceptual and theoretical umbrella. The result is a syllabus which many regard as "unwieldy, if not incoherent, bursting at the seams, and often palpably unsuccessful" at the level of classroom implementation. This paper considers a different approach to understanding literacy in general and critical literacy in particular. This approach aims to transcend the earlier kind of compartmentalized view and develops a sociocultural view of literacy as necessarily involving three dimensions: "operational," "cultural," and "critical." According to the paper, an integrated view of literacy in practice and in pedagogy addresses all three dimensions simultaneously; none has any priority. The paper describes and discusses the three dimensions in detail. It outlines the elements of a framework for critical literacy and relates them to some examples encountered around Brisbane of young people exploring new technological literacies in varied settings. Examples in the paper involve school students and young adults who worked within a community-based space called GRUNT during 1995-97. The paper concludes by envisaging possibilities for a critical literacy pedagogy built around the use of new technologies. (Contains 33 references.) (NKA) Reproductions supplied by EDRS are the best that can be made from the original document. Critical Literacy and New Technologies. U.& DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Office at Educational Research and Improvement EDUCATIONAL RESOURCES INFORMATION CENTER (ERIC) C This document has been reproduced as received from the person or organization originating it. 0 Minor changes have been made to improve reproduction quality. Points of view or opinions stated in this document do not necessarily represent official OERI position or policy. by Colin Lankshear and Michele Knobel PERMISSION TO REPRODUCE AND DISSEMINATE THIS MATERIAL HAS BEEN GRANTED BY BEST COPY AVMs Al 0. Lan 6hea_i' TO THE EDUCATIONAL RESOURCES INFORMATION CENTER (ERIC) http://www.geocities.com/Athens/Academy/1160/critlitnewtechs.html Critical Literacy and New Technologies Colin Lankshear and Michele Knobel paper presented at the American Education Research Association
[1]
Paulo Freire,et al.
Pedagogy of the Oppressed
,
2019,
Toward a Just World Order.
[2]
David Mattison.
The War of Desire and Technology at the Close of the Mechanical Age, by Allucquère Rosanne Stone
,
1997,
J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..
[3]
U. Franklin.
The real world of technology
,
1993
.
[4]
A. R. Stone,et al.
The War of Desire and Technology at the Close of the Mechanical Age
,
1995
.
[5]
Nicholas C. Burbules,et al.
Digital Rhetorics: Literacies and Technologies in Education - Current Practices and Future Directions (Volumes 1-3)
,
1997
.
[6]
Cheryl Becker,et al.
What is Literacy?
,
1989
.
[7]
G. Smart.
The new work order: behind the language of the new capitalism
,
2000
.
[8]
J. Gee.
Social Linguistics and Literacies
,
1990
.
[9]
M. Castells.
The rise of the network society
,
1996
.
[10]
J. Gee,et al.
The New Work Order
,
1996
.
[11]
Pam Gilbert,et al.
Writing, Schooling and Deconstruction: From Voice to Text in the Classroom
,
1989
.
[12]
L. Winner.
Mythinformation in the high-tech era
,
1984
.
[13]
Bill Green,et al.
Subject-Specific Literacy and School Learning: A Focus on Writing
,
1988
.
[14]
N. Postman,et al.
"Mix a Little Folly with Your Wisdom"--Horace@@@Children and Television.@@@Amusing Ourselves to Death: Public Discourse in the Age of Show Business.
,
1987
.
[15]
M. Breier,et al.
The Social Uses of Literacy: Theory and Practice in Contemporary South Africa. Studies in Written Language and Literacy, Volume 4.
,
1996
.
[16]
J. Gee.
Social Linguistics And Literacies: Ideology in Discourse
,
1996
.
[17]
David Buckingham,et al.
Cultural studies goes to school : reading and teaching popular media
,
1995
.
[18]
Constance C. Gerger.
Social Linguistics and Literacies: Ideology in Discourses.
,
1993
.
[19]
Michele Knobel,et al.
Everyday Literacies: Students, Discourse, and Social Practice
,
1998
.