Dynamic performance of an aiming control methodology for solar central receivers due to cloud disturbances

An appropriate control of the heat flux distribution over the solar central receiver is essential to achieve an efficient and safe operation of solar tower systems. High solar radiation variation due to moving clouds may cause failures to the solar receiver. This paper shows a dynamic performance analysis of a solar central receiver operating when short-time cloud passages partially shade the solar field. The solar receiver incorporates an aiming methodology based on a closed loop model predictive control approach. The DNI changes are simulated using an agent-based model that closely emulates the transients in solar radiation caused by clouds. These models are coupled with a solar system model that resembles the Gemasolar solar plant. The simulations showed that the base feedback loop aiming strategy could successfully restore the solar receiver back to its steady state after transient operations caused by clouds. However, undesired overshoots in incident flux density and high heating rates in the controlled variables were found. These issues are overcome through a setpoint readjustment approach, which is temporally supported by a PI controller. The results show that the proposed aiming control strategy can provide a continuous safe operation of the solar central receiver when subject to transient flux distribution due to clouds.

[1]  Frédérik Thiery,et al.  Control of the flux distribution on a solar tower receiver using an optimized aiming point strategy: Application to THEMIS solar tower , 2013 .

[2]  Manuel Berenguel,et al.  Heuristic knowledge-based heliostat field control for the optimization of the temperature distribution in a volumetric receiver , 1999 .

[3]  D. Yogi Goswami,et al.  A computationally efficient method for the design of the heliostat field for solar power tower plant , 2014 .

[4]  Robert Pitz-Paal,et al.  Visual HFLCAL - A Software Tool for Layout and Optimisation of Heliostat Fields , 2009 .

[5]  Gasser E. Hassan,et al.  New Temperature-based Models for Predicting Global Solar Radiation , 2016 .

[6]  Boon-Han Lim,et al.  General Sun Tracking Formula for Heliostats With Arbitrarily Oriented Axes , 2006 .

[7]  Germain Augsburger,et al.  Modelling of the receiver transient flux distribution due to cloud passages on a solar tower thermal power plant , 2013 .

[8]  J. A. Rossiter,et al.  Model-Based Predictive Control : A Practical Approach , 2017 .

[9]  Z. Şen Solar Energy Fundamentals and Modeling Techniques: Atmosphere, Environment, Climate Change and Renewable Energy , 2008 .

[10]  Zhifeng Wang,et al.  Dynamic simulation and experimental validation of an open air receiver and a thermal energy storage system for solar thermal power plant , 2016 .

[11]  S. Saeed Mostafavi Tehrani,et al.  Off-design simulation and performance of molten salt cavity receivers in solar tower plants under realistic operational modes and control strategies , 2016 .

[12]  Theocharis Tsoutsos,et al.  Technical and economical evaluation of solar thermal power generation , 2003 .

[13]  Elias K. Stefanakos,et al.  Optimal heliostat aiming strategy for uniform distribution of heat flux on the receiver of a solar power tower plant , 2014 .

[14]  Francisco J. Collado,et al.  Campo: Generation of regular heliostat fields , 2012 .

[15]  M. Kiera,et al.  Heliostat Field: Computer Codes, Requirements, Comparison of Methods , 1989 .

[16]  L. L. vant-Hull,et al.  The Role of “Allowable Flux Density” in the Design and Operation of Molten-Salt Solar Central Receivers , 2001 .

[17]  Francisco J. Collado,et al.  A review of optimized design layouts for solar power tower plants with campo code , 2013 .

[18]  Manuel Berenguel,et al.  Control of Solar Energy Systems , 2012 .

[19]  P. K. Falcone A handbook for solar central receiver design , 1986 .

[20]  Qiang Yu,et al.  Analysis and improvement of solar flux distribution inside a cavity receiver based on multi-focal points of heliostat field , 2014 .

[21]  Marco E. Sanjuan,et al.  A biomimetic approach for modeling cloud shading with dynamic behavior , 2016 .

[22]  Francisco J. Collado,et al.  Calculation of the annual thermal energy supplied by a defined heliostat field , 1989 .

[23]  G. Sassi Some notes on shadow and blockage effects , 1983 .

[24]  Christos N. Markides,et al.  Transient freezing of molten salts in pipe-flow systems: application to the direct reactor auxiliary cooling system (DRACS) , 2017 .

[25]  M. Berenguel,et al.  On Achieving a Desired Flux Distribution on the Receiver of a Solar Power Tower Plant , 2017 .

[26]  F. Collado One-point fitting of the flux density produced by a heliostat , 2010 .

[27]  Alvaro Sanchez-Gonzalez,et al.  Solar flux distribution on central receivers: A projection method from analytic function , 2015 .

[28]  M. R. Rodríguez-Sánchez,et al.  Aiming strategy model based on allowable flux densities for molten salt central receivers , 2017 .

[29]  Robert A. Taylor,et al.  Assessment of direct normal irradiance and cloud connections using satellite data over Australia , 2015 .

[30]  Jianqin Zhu,et al.  Experimental investigation on the energy and exergy performance of a coiled tube solar receiver , 2015 .

[31]  Alexis B. Zavoico,et al.  Solar Power Tower Design Basis Document, Revision 0 , 2001 .